Torquer II, PRC Stage 2.5 Results - LS1TECH

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Torquer II, PRC Stage 2.5 Results

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2005, 08:59 AM   #1
TECH Fanatic
 
iamsickofitall's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 18
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Send a message via AIM to iamsickofitall
Default Torquer II, PRC Stage 2.5 Results

Got my setup tuned at TTP. It seems a tad low to me but I have no baseline to compare against and I know I have limiting factors such as cats on my setup. The rest of my mods are in the sig.
Attached Thumbnails
Torquer II, PRC Stage 2.5 Results-dynograph-8-30-05.jpg  
__________________
1999 Black Z28



'07 Ford Exploder Sport Trac 4x4 V6
iamsickofitall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 09:14 AM   #2
10 Second Club
 
Z'mnypit's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 58
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,712
Default

I would say that it is a little low. Removing the cats would help a bit but not that much. Still pretty impressive #'s though.. Did you not spray it on the dyno?
__________________
2006 LS1tech Calendar cover car

Sold and missed: 99 Z28 M6 PICS AND INFO

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y98/99camaro/1testcopysig.gif
Z'mnypit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 09:24 AM   #3
Banned
 
TTPMatt's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 18
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 2,984
Send a message via AIM to TTPMatt
Default

No spray. We adjusted the timing up and down to try to squeek more power but that was it...
TTPMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 09:48 AM   #4
TECH Fanatic
 
iamsickofitall's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 18
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Send a message via AIM to iamsickofitall
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTPMatt
No spray. We adjusted the timing up and down to try to squeek more power but that was it...
what he said
__________________
1999 Black Z28



'07 Ford Exploder Sport Trac 4x4 V6
iamsickofitall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 11:28 AM   #5
TECH Fanatic
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 20
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Send a message via Yahoo to Orange Peel
Default

Seems a little low to me, I'm shooting for 440+rwhp with my PRC's, granted they have 2.055/1.60 valves, and I have roughly 410rwhp now, but I would think you should net more than that. Aren't there people hitting near 400rwhp with that cam alone?
__________________
Scott
Orange Peel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 12:01 PM   #6
LS1TECH Sponsor
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,177
Default

Do you have a baseline from before the h/c? That is always the best way to determine the performance gains. I think we'll start to see alot of dyno results coming up very soon. We've been shipping alot of the back orders here lately. We should also see some more independent results from Jason @ Thunder pretty soon, he's installing his set this weekend hopefully

Can you post the before graph?
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason 98 TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 02:36 PM   #7
TECH Fanatic
 
iamsickofitall's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 18
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Send a message via AIM to iamsickofitall
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
Do you have a baseline from before the h/c? That is always the best way to determine the performance gains. I think we'll start to see alot of dyno results coming up very soon. We've been shipping alot of the back orders here lately. We should also see some more independent results from Jason @ Thunder pretty soon, he's installing his set this weekend hopefully

Can you post the before graph?
no baseline dyno numbers
__________________
1999 Black Z28



'07 Ford Exploder Sport Trac 4x4 V6
iamsickofitall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 03:18 PM   #8
TECH Fanatic
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 20
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Send a message via Yahoo to Orange Peel
Default

What does the flow sheet say from PRC?
__________________
Scott
Orange Peel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 04:44 PM   #9
12 Second Club
 
black_z's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,324
Send a message via AIM to black_z Send a message via MSN to black_z
Default

Seems pretty low.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyin red TA
But most importantly, could you still see yourself peeing in her butt in 40 years?
black_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 05:11 PM   #10
why so serious?
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,020
Default

Only way to know what kind of gain you really achieved with the heads/cam would be if you had a baseline before you added them. Thats what I'll be doing before I add my cam, and then again if I get heads. No other way. Hell, you could have been putting 330 full bolt-ons down before the heads cam(just a weak tune/no tune?), in which case 415 is a hell of a gain.
__________________
Karma is a mean bitch.
cyphur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 05:50 PM   #11
TECH Fanatic
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 20
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Send a message via Yahoo to Orange Peel
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
Only way to know what kind of gain you really achieved with the heads/cam would be if you had a baseline before you added them. Thats what I'll be doing before I add my cam, and then again if I get heads. No other way. Hell, you could have been putting 330 full bolt-ons down before the heads cam(just a weak tune/no tune?), in which case 415 is a hell of a gain.
I don't know Cyph, I still think it's too low. I started with 347rwhp with my stock cam to 405rwhp with a cam only swap, nothing else. I think he should be in the 430rwhp range with that cam and the heads if things are working out ok, especially since he looks to be on the stock 10 bolt and a single disk clutch.
__________________
Scott
Orange Peel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2005, 02:36 AM   #12
Banned
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 603
Default

I don't think that's bad at all. Remember that TSP, more often than not, dynos with a true dual catless set-up. I think that alone would put you right around 440 HP and 400 TQ.
SilverSurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2005, 02:36 AM
LS1Tech
Pontiac Firebird




Paid Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Join Ls1Tech

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details