Very Dissapointed with dyno results today...
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very Dissapointed with dyno results today...
I had the car dyoed on a dynojet today. Last year with cam/headers it pulled 370 RWHP and 340 RWTQ. I recently added AFR 205 heads, running 11.4 CR with a .032 quench. See for yourself how the numbers came out below. The guy dynoing said that the tune was pretty darn close...it was a mail order tune from Jeff Creech. He also said it was pulling 26* timing. Let me know what you guys think of this and what problems there may be as to why they were so low.
-Josh
-Josh
#2
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joshp14
I had the car dyoed on a dynojet today. Last year with cam/headers it pulled 370 RWHP and 340 RWTQ. I recently added AFR 205 heads, running 11.4 CR with a .032 quench. See for yourself how the numbers came out below. The guy dynoing said that the tune was pretty darn close...it was a mail order tune from Jeff Creech. He also said it was pulling 26* timing. Let me know what you guys think of this and what problems there may be as to why they were so low.
-Josh
-Josh
So all you added were heads right? I guess bumping the compression was good for pwr and tq over the curve. Maybe you should throw a cam in it.
#4
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
somethign is wrong, what pushrods did you use? full list of mods? honestly i dont trust the tune as i looked at two tunes today that looked like crap. i have an f13 and AFR heads and pulled 450/415 with a FAST, heavy ls7 clutch and full exhaust on 10:1 CR.
anyway you can send me a tuning file of it or no? i will tell you right now 26* of timing is not enough and cam only if you are a 6 speed, should have put down around 400 hp
anyway you can send me a tuning file of it or no? i will tell you right now 26* of timing is not enough and cam only if you are a 6 speed, should have put down around 400 hp
#5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
i went through your mods on your page, similar to mine. i woudl put in some TR6 plugs gapped at 0.045". you should be making 445-450 with an ls6 intake without a problem. might want to check on the recommended lifter preload for those lifters....what length PR's do you have? i will tell you right now you are going to want some 36# injectors for that thing too, if you are on stock you better upgrade quick cause you will run them over 100%
#7
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
7.325" pushrods - thread here - https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/484155-so-i-measured-pushrod-length-need-input.html
Full list of mods here: http://www.midwestfbodymeet.com/01tapics.html
I dont have the tune file cuz it was a mail order tune from Jeff Creech....the guy doing the dyno said it looked pretty close....so I dont know.
Full list of mods here: http://www.midwestfbodymeet.com/01tapics.html
I dont have the tune file cuz it was a mail order tune from Jeff Creech....the guy doing the dyno said it looked pretty close....so I dont know.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
a/f looked close but timing can make a world of difference. just have to start eliminating problems so you can get the power the car should make.
i would call the place you got the lifters from and find out preload information from the manufacturer and plunger depth
i would call the place you got the lifters from and find out preload information from the manufacturer and plunger depth
#9
FormerVendor
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joshp14
The guy dynoing said that the tune was pretty darn close...it was a mail order tune from Jeff Creech. He also said it was pulling 26* timing. Let me know what you guys think of this and what problems there may be as to why they were so low.
[/img]
[/img]
#13
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
To me, it looks like your throttle body is not opening up all the way. Basically, you start showing the gains down low, then they go away. I know it sounds too easy to miss, but I've seen Stock Eliminator guys miss this before. Check the throttle cable and have someone step on the throttle and see if you're getting 100% throttle opening.
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
#15
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
Originally Posted by Patrick G
To me, it looks like your throttle body is not opening up all the way. Basically, you start showing the gains down low, then they go away. I know it sounds too easy to miss, but I've seen Stock Eliminator guys miss this before. Check the throttle cable and have someone step on the throttle and see if you're getting 100% throttle opening.
#16
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok to answer all the questions...I do have stock injectors...I read on LS1tech that these would work up to 450 RWHP. Do you think that this problem could be injector or fuel related?
The lifter plunger depth on the lifters is suppose to be the same as stock...Lunati said a .030-.040 preload. Given the pushrods available, I chose a .050 preload over a .025 preload by going with the 7.325" pushrods.
I dont think he had a editing program hooked up while on the dyno, I believe it was a Snap-on scanner where you can monitor engine parameters. I dont know how the guy dynoing based his judgement that the tune was "pretty close"...I guess he may have been going off of timing and A/F ratio.
The first time it was on the dyno it was a Mustang Dyno where the numbers were converted to dynojet numbers...so I never really had a true dynojet number. Stock numbers on Mustang dyno was 301 RWHP. Cam/Headers was 368 RWHP on same dyno and now on this dynojet its 380. Track times BEFORE heads with cam/headers only was a best of 12.5@115 with 2.xx 60' times on street tires. The tune we had on the car before the heads was done by a friend using EFI Live and his basic knowledge.
The car doesnt feel a whole lot different after the heads, there is some more in the low end, but then again I did 4.10 gears at the same time as the heads. Cant really notice much difference mid to upper RPM. Havent been to the track yet...heads dont even have 1000 miles on them yet.
I am using the TR55 plugs at the stock gap. Should I narrow this up a little running higher compression?
Patrick, would I check this by just looking into the throttle body while someone is on the pedal? Or would I use a scan tool to monitor the TPS voltage or % open? The only thing we have done to the throttle body is bascially hand sand it to smooth and polished it with some polish.
It has always used ONLY BP/Amoco 92 octane fuel as I cant find anything higher around here except the 93 at Wal-Mart which I refuse to buy (I hate Wal-Mart).
The lifter plunger depth on the lifters is suppose to be the same as stock...Lunati said a .030-.040 preload. Given the pushrods available, I chose a .050 preload over a .025 preload by going with the 7.325" pushrods.
I dont think he had a editing program hooked up while on the dyno, I believe it was a Snap-on scanner where you can monitor engine parameters. I dont know how the guy dynoing based his judgement that the tune was "pretty close"...I guess he may have been going off of timing and A/F ratio.
The first time it was on the dyno it was a Mustang Dyno where the numbers were converted to dynojet numbers...so I never really had a true dynojet number. Stock numbers on Mustang dyno was 301 RWHP. Cam/Headers was 368 RWHP on same dyno and now on this dynojet its 380. Track times BEFORE heads with cam/headers only was a best of 12.5@115 with 2.xx 60' times on street tires. The tune we had on the car before the heads was done by a friend using EFI Live and his basic knowledge.
The car doesnt feel a whole lot different after the heads, there is some more in the low end, but then again I did 4.10 gears at the same time as the heads. Cant really notice much difference mid to upper RPM. Havent been to the track yet...heads dont even have 1000 miles on them yet.
I am using the TR55 plugs at the stock gap. Should I narrow this up a little running higher compression?
Patrick, would I check this by just looking into the throttle body while someone is on the pedal? Or would I use a scan tool to monitor the TPS voltage or % open? The only thing we have done to the throttle body is bascially hand sand it to smooth and polished it with some polish.
It has always used ONLY BP/Amoco 92 octane fuel as I cant find anything higher around here except the 93 at Wal-Mart which I refuse to buy (I hate Wal-Mart).
Last edited by joshp14; 05-07-2006 at 10:59 AM.
#17
FormerVendor
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scan it with EFI Live for the TP. I would seriously reconsider the grudge on Walmart my friend if they are your only source of 93. I just came back from Bahrain- land of oil in the heart of the middle east they only have 89 You don't hate Walmart because you are a serious tree huggin, Kerry votn', Honda drivn', dirty hippie peacenick? I mean Iv'e never known one to drive a muscle car...
#18
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doc
Scan it with EFI Live for the TP. I would seriously reconsider the grudge on Walmart my friend if they are your only source of 93. I just came back from Bahrain- land of oil in the heart of the middle east they only have 89 You don't hate Walmart because you are a serious tree huggin, Kerry votn', Honda drivn', dirty hippie peacenick? I mean Iv'e never known one to drive a muscle car...
#20
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by joshp14
7.325" pushrods - thread here - https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=484155
Full list of mods here: http://www.midwestfbodymeet.com/01tapics.html
I dont have the tune file cuz it was a mail order tune from Jeff Creech....the guy doing the dyno said it looked pretty close....so I dont know.
Full list of mods here: http://www.midwestfbodymeet.com/01tapics.html
I dont have the tune file cuz it was a mail order tune from Jeff Creech....the guy doing the dyno said it looked pretty close....so I dont know.
maybe the pushrods are off, you have to get the stock length 7.400", just an idea to check.