Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

How will a TC76 perform compared to an MPT70 or MPT76?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2010, 09:18 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
cjmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default How will a TC76 perform compared to an MPT70 or MPT76?

Can anyone explain the driving characteristics and the differences in how each would perform on a 5.3?
Old 01-22-2010, 09:24 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Johnv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

TC76 Should spool as quick as the t70 and outperform the t76, and is physically a little smaller than the MPT 70 if your pushed for space.
Old 01-22-2010, 09:48 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
52172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Buellton Ca
Posts: 3,489
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

sounds like a pretty accurate description of what it would compare like. TC is a much better turbo than any MP turbo.
Old 01-22-2010, 10:41 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Stack a TC78 Aginst the supposed Bad Boy MPT88 ...
Guys on a strict budget, sure go for the Master Power turbos.
Guys that want the most out of thier setups spend the $$$ for a quality unit.
I myself will not put a Master Power turbo on one of my setups.
Old 01-23-2010, 11:45 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
turbocuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The turbine wheel is the killer here....purchase a tc76 with a p-trim wheel and see what happens....now order a masterpower 76 with the largest 87mm turbine wheel and see what would happen.
Old 01-23-2010, 12:42 PM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by turbocuda
The turbine wheel is the killer here....purchase a tc76 with a p-trim wheel and see what happens....now order a masterpower 76 with the largest 87mm turbine wheel and see what would happen.
Why even bother with the P-trim wheel. The F1 wheel is a damn near standard option on the TC series of turbos. A MPT76 doesnt hold a candle to the TC76. Period. I have seen the Maps personaly, Hence the reason I wont offer a Master Power anything on my setups.
Old 01-23-2010, 03:01 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
spaz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary Ab. Canada
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What is the difference between the tc series and t series?
Old 01-23-2010, 03:17 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Johnv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The TC series have a smaller compressor housing (same size wheels),
make a little less power tham the T series Turbonetics, but spool faster and are much more compact if your pushed for space in the engine bay or under car if rearmount.
Old 01-25-2010, 10:30 PM
  #9  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
carlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Very valuable info guys. I was wondering the same info. Looks like I need more room in the budget.
Old 01-26-2010, 07:35 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
OneMeanZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Johnv
The TC series have a smaller compressor housing (same size wheels),
make a little less power tham the T series Turbonetics, but spool faster and are much more compact if your pushed for space in the engine bay or under car if rearmount.
Is it a drastic difference in physical size between the TC76 and T76? A friend is giving me a hell of a deal on a Turbonectics T76, only 10hrs of run time, for $750. But if I can save a substantial amount of space I may opt for a TC76, do you guys think the price of that T76 is good?
Old 01-26-2010, 11:08 AM
  #11  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OneMeanZ
Is it a drastic difference in physical size between the TC76 and T76? A friend is giving me a hell of a deal on a Turbonectics T76, only 10hrs of run time, for $750. But if I can save a substantial amount of space I may opt for a TC76, do you guys think the price of that T76 is good?
Take the T76 if it is Turbonetics. I changed my TC's for T's (which really are HP76's) and the compressor housing is ~ 0.75" bigger...no big deal.
Old 01-26-2010, 01:10 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
jfg455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: nh
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OneMeanZ
Is it a drastic difference in physical size between the TC76 and T76? A friend is giving me a hell of a deal on a Turbonectics T76, only 10hrs of run time, for $750. But if I can save a substantial amount of space I may opt for a TC76, do you guys think the price of that T76 is good?
you can buy a brand new T76 Q .96 a/r from Treadst**e for $900 so that doesn't seem like a good deal to me. A T76 ball bearing is only $1400 and change
Old 01-27-2010, 07:22 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
salemetro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Salem/Keizer
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Interesting thread. Up until now, I've been basing my 5.3 build (I'll figure out the 6.0 later) around a MP76. This thread has me thinking twice. So, given a 5.3 w/ported 6.0 heads, '03 Zo6 cam, 3400 stall, and a target of 15psi....what might be my best choice going with Turbonetics?

Sorry...not meaning to hijack the thread...this just has me curious.

Oh, and I guess I might have a new mp76 for sale
Old 01-27-2010, 07:35 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
cjmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by salemetro
Interesting thread. Up until now, I've been basing my 5.3 build (I'll figure out the 6.0 later) around a MP76. This thread has me thinking twice. So, given a 5.3 w/ported 6.0 heads, '03 Zo6 cam, 3400 stall, and a target of 15psi....what might be my best choice going with Turbonetics?

Sorry...not meaning to hijack the thread...this just has me curious.

Oh, and I guess I might have a new mp76 for sale
ie got the same setup as you man, except i may use a smaller stall as im in a 3000lb car
Old 01-27-2010, 09:46 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Johnv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by salemetro
Interesting thread. Up until now, I've been basing my 5.3 build (I'll figure out the 6.0 later) around a MP76. This thread has me thinking twice. So, given a 5.3 w/ported 6.0 heads, '03 Zo6 cam, 3400 stall, and a target of 15psi....what might be my best choice going with Turbonetics?

Sorry...not meaning to hijack the thread...this just has me curious.

Oh, and I guess I might have a new mp76 for sale
The MPT turbos are a good bang for buck turbo if your on a budget, but if your chaseing numbers the turbonetics would be a better choice.
Old 01-27-2010, 10:37 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
salemetro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Salem/Keizer
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Johnv
The MPT turbos are a good bang for buck turbo if your on a budget, but if your chaseing numbers the turbonetics would be a better choice.

Budget?? LOL Yeah, I WAS on a budget...'till I passed the 23k mark being sucked from my wallet. I originally intended to spend 10-12k, but now realize that I'm into this thing way too much to turn back. Along the way, dependability became very important as I decided this car needs to have daily-driver ability. I had read that many folks here were very happy with MP, so I went with them. Maybe I should have read a little more?
Old 01-28-2010, 10:54 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sutherlin OR
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

There's nothing wrong with MP turbos, your comparing a $750 turbo against a $1000+ turbo... I haven't heard of any one failing a MP turbo in a LONGGGGG time and there's plenty of them out there. The MP Q-trims are brand new and not a lot of guys running them yet. Since the turbine wheel is only about 2mm smaller then a F-1 Turbonetics wheel (67mm vs 69mm), power should be in the same ball park. I don't think you could tell much of a difference unless you where actually maxing out both units, then the Turbonetcis should be good for a few more HP.
Old 01-28-2010, 02:36 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
cjmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

woulda thought that ForcedInductions or ModularTurbo woulda chimed in by now
Old 01-28-2010, 02:44 PM
  #19  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Forced Inductions and I both feel the same way about MP Turbo's. We dont push them to our customers.
Old 01-28-2010, 02:49 PM
  #20  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The turbine wheels may be the same size but the F1 wheel is far beyond in terms of flow. I am sure Jose or the like has seen the turbine wheel maps.


Quick Reply: How will a TC76 perform compared to an MPT70 or MPT76?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.