Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Are the callies dragonslayer cranks not strong enough for supercharged applications

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2010, 06:46 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
hawkls7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Are the callies dragonslayer cranks not strong enough for supercharged applications

i have broken my crank and now wondering why? has any body else had this problem, what should i do to solve my issue, pics below.
Attached Thumbnails Are the callies dragonslayer cranks not strong enough for supercharged applications-crank-photos-002.jpg   Are the callies dragonslayer cranks not strong enough for supercharged applications-crank-photos-004.jpg   Are the callies dragonslayer cranks not strong enough for supercharged applications-crank-photos-005.jpg   Are the callies dragonslayer cranks not strong enough for supercharged applications-crank-photos-008.jpg  
Old 05-20-2010, 06:49 PM
  #2  
FormerVendor
 
Jordan_NationalSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What was your torque and horsepower on the setup? That's insane.
Old 05-20-2010, 06:51 PM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
hawkls7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

my rear wheel hp was 1100
Old 05-20-2010, 07:00 PM
  #4  
FormerVendor
 
Jordan_NationalSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmmm, that seems really low for a Dragon Slayer to fail.
Old 05-20-2010, 07:07 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
OUTLAWZ RACING's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: COLUMBUS GA.
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Better question, what belt drive u have on there? Also it dosent look like it was heated from bering friction either. Im not 100% sure but too much belt tension may have caused it, also what type of transmission?
Old 05-20-2010, 08:02 PM
  #6  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Shawn @ VA Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia Beach,Virginia
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

seen a couple of the callies fail in this area on sc applications-i would run the lunati pro series,i like their forging a little better.
Old 05-20-2010, 10:28 PM
  #7  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

What did Callies say? Looks pretty thin where it broke and the bearings shown all look decent. I'd try to see if they will do something about it. For what those things cost, I'd hope so unless there is other damage not pictured.
Old 05-20-2010, 11:46 PM
  #8  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
hawkls7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OUTLAWZ RACING
Better question, what belt drive u have on there? Also it dosent look like it was heated from bering friction either. Im not 100% sure but too much belt tension may have caused it, also what type of transmission?
belt drive is 50mm gilmer. berings looked fine , transmision is 4l80e with yank 3400 stall
Old 05-21-2010, 08:32 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
CarsandWomen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: houston TX
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how was the tune? nitrous? its very odd to see such a clean snap like that on a high quality crank. at 1100hp youll have super high quality rods and pistons, which leads me to believe this is possible: you had a very early detonation in one cylinder, the rod and piston held up cuz theyre awesome like that. that one piston fired so early it rotated the crank backwards vs the other 7, pow pow chicken.
Old 05-21-2010, 08:36 AM
  #10  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
89LS1RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago, illinois
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

but look at where it broke. its the end, there was no other rod to push the wrong way.
Old 05-21-2010, 09:07 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
Jontall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

I've never seen this happen before... That's not good and I'd have Callies on the phone seeking answers. I always thought Callies made a good product.
Old 05-21-2010, 09:40 AM
  #12  
Teching In
 
jdpepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know some of the guys around here that run the traditional sbc supercharged cars order their cranks w/ BBC snouts. I don't know if that is common practice w/ the ls engines tho....
Old 05-21-2010, 09:51 AM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
LS1RedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Wow. Thats pretty insane! Some have used stock cranks on here to that hp level.
Old 05-21-2010, 11:18 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
CarsandWomen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: houston TX
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 89LS1RS
but look at where it broke. its the end, there was no other rod to push the wrong way.
good point


OP what are the details of the situation surrounding the failure? it doesnt look beat up like the rpms wound down after the break either
Old 05-21-2010, 05:46 PM
  #15  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Front pulley out of balance or something ?
Old 05-21-2010, 05:54 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (177)
 
Jimmy P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Wow. Thats pretty insane! Some have used stock cranks on here to that hp level.
But I am sure those weren't supercharged cars with gilmore belt setups...
Old 05-21-2010, 06:16 PM
  #17  
7 Second Club
 
atomicfusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I ran the Callies Compstar up to 1132rwhp and never had it fail... This year on my rebuild we went to the Magnum, but that is only because we are pushing up to 1500ish on the RWHP number.

I've always had good luck with callies...
Old 05-21-2010, 07:08 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (28)
 
93formto98T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by atomicfusion
I ran the Callies Compstar up to 1132rwhp and never had it fail... This year on my rebuild we went to the Magnum, but that is only because we are pushing up to 1500ish on the RWHP number.

I've always had good luck with callies...
Hold on! Now you're comparing apples to oranges. You can in no way compare the stressed of a turbo car (your car) to a SC car. The torque that is placed on the crank snout with a big cog drive blower CAN twist cranks in two whereas as turbo car does not have this added counter-torque. As Shawn@VA Speed mentioned, this is not freak occurence. Big cog drive blowers on LSx motors pushing BIG power is a relatively new frontier and apparently things aren't quite up to par with say the SBC crank with BBC snout...there's obviously a reason for that. I'm regearing my F2 cog with my new setup aiming for 1500rw and Shawn's putting in a Lunati Pro Series crank...hopefully I won't see this issue.

Last edited by 93formto98T/A; 05-21-2010 at 08:13 PM.
Old 05-21-2010, 08:01 PM
  #19  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Shawn @ VA Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia Beach,Virginia
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

There is nothing wrong with the Callies crankshaft-it is a very capable forging that i have pushed to 2000hp in an ls engine.The stress that the supercharger puts on the crank is much different and the normal stresses a crankshaft sees,the is the reasons for such things as crankshaft supports.The placement of the belt also makes a huge difference-the further forward of the engine,the worse it is.The Lunati forging seems to have a little more material in the overlap area,which should help greatly.
Old 05-22-2010, 05:24 AM
  #20  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
hawkls7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Shawn @ VA Speed
There is nothing wrong with the Callies crankshaft-it is a very capable forging that i have pushed to 2000hp in an ls engine.The stress that the supercharger puts on the crank is much different and the normal stresses a crankshaft sees,the is the reasons for such things as crankshaft supports.The placement of the belt also makes a huge difference-the further forward of the engine,the worse it is.The Lunati forging seems to have a little more material in the overlap area,which should help greatly.
there is not enough material in the overlap as you say, is it safer to not have the lightning hole drilled, keep it solid . I have searched every where for crankshaft supports but i dont seem to see any for the ls engines.I dont want it to happen again, i think i got off lightly this time.


Quick Reply: Are the callies dragonslayer cranks not strong enough for supercharged applications



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.