Seeking advice re: STS turbo and LS1 engine
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
13 Posts
Seeking advice re: STS turbo and LS1 engine
Any advice would be great, positive or negative.
Car is a 1998 Chev Camaro Z28 with the 346 LS1. Running a set of TSP PRC Stage 2.5 5.3L heads (combustion chamber 62cc vs 66cc stock LS1 head), Comp Cams 230/224 111LSA cam, LS6 Intake, Long Style Headers, Ported stock throttle body. Moser 12 bolt rear end 3.90 gears, rebuilt 6 spd tranny and the list goes on.
Installed STS GT-67 turbo kit on car w FMIC (no meth inj yet). Within 100 miles, engine went kaput. Cylinder #7 now missing some of the piston.
Need to sort out what to do while keeping costs to a minimum. Goal is to run 650-750 crank horsepower max. Can this be done on an aluminum LS1 (346ci/383ci/393ci) engine with forged internals and PRC stage 2.5 5.3L heads with a proper cam and meth injection? My car with h/c/i was just under 500 hp crank and stock internals.
Any advice would be welcome and appreciated (i would prefer to stay with the LS1 as i can reuse heads and don't require a conversion kit for the LS2 style engine).
Car is a 1998 Chev Camaro Z28 with the 346 LS1. Running a set of TSP PRC Stage 2.5 5.3L heads (combustion chamber 62cc vs 66cc stock LS1 head), Comp Cams 230/224 111LSA cam, LS6 Intake, Long Style Headers, Ported stock throttle body. Moser 12 bolt rear end 3.90 gears, rebuilt 6 spd tranny and the list goes on.
Installed STS GT-67 turbo kit on car w FMIC (no meth inj yet). Within 100 miles, engine went kaput. Cylinder #7 now missing some of the piston.
Need to sort out what to do while keeping costs to a minimum. Goal is to run 650-750 crank horsepower max. Can this be done on an aluminum LS1 (346ci/383ci/393ci) engine with forged internals and PRC stage 2.5 5.3L heads with a proper cam and meth injection? My car with h/c/i was just under 500 hp crank and stock internals.
Any advice would be welcome and appreciated (i would prefer to stay with the LS1 as i can reuse heads and don't require a conversion kit for the LS2 style engine).
#2
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stay stock cubes, just put in some forged rods and pistons.
Go callies compstar rods
Diamond or weisco pistons
Turn the boost up and have fun. Can easily reach your goal at 10-13psi.
Go callies compstar rods
Diamond or weisco pistons
Turn the boost up and have fun. Can easily reach your goal at 10-13psi.
#4
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
I agree as it is much better do drop the compression ratio by swapping out the heads, than it is with dished pistons. Basically you want a flat top piston with a lot of material above the top ring. Bob
__________________
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076
PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com
https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076
PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com
https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website
#5
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
13 Posts
Thanks for the input guys. I just read an interesting link on the forced induction link on this website that suggests that a properly built forged internalled 347 should be able to meet my goals. A 383ci with forged internals in my mind would be able to meet that goal a little easier. At least i know i'm on the right track.
I will certainly look to meth injection and will look into head options and some of the differences between my PRC stage 2.5 5.3L heads and the 6L heads.
You guys have some crazy *** fast builds going on.
Watch out Bugattis and AWD Lambos with forced induction!
I will certainly look to meth injection and will look into head options and some of the differences between my PRC stage 2.5 5.3L heads and the 6L heads.
You guys have some crazy *** fast builds going on.
Watch out Bugattis and AWD Lambos with forced induction!
#6
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You would also stand to benefit from selling your long tube headers and putting stock manifolds back on and wrapping the exhaust to keep the heat in. The turbo will spool much quicker than with the LT's.
#7
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
13 Posts
Do you know how much that would assist with the turbo spooling? Are we talking 200rpm sooner or 1,000rpm sooner? Would utilizing a stock manifold and smaller exhaust tubing necessitate a different cam at all or cylinder head selection for a rear mount turbo?
Would i be wrapping the tubing that comes off the exhaust back to the turbo, or from the turbo to the intake?
Sorry about my lack of technical knowledge. Still learning about forced induction.
Would i be wrapping the tubing that comes off the exhaust back to the turbo, or from the turbo to the intake?
Sorry about my lack of technical knowledge. Still learning about forced induction.
Trending Topics
#10
Launching!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: cookeville, tn
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Faribault, MN
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well with boost I've always heard the lower the better. Guess I can't think of any good reason to not go 9:1
Not sure how much extra boost you would be able to push with a .5 point drop in compression, but I would think that it would make any level that much safer.
Not sure how much extra boost you would be able to push with a .5 point drop in compression, but I would think that it would make any level that much safer.
#15
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CR really depends on your goals. No need to lower too much if you aren't going to put much boost on the car. Stock LS1's are fine with 5-8lbs and sometimes more. I'd be worried more with valve float than anything. The stock LS6 cam is actually a rather nice option for turbo cars and will save some money. Every high HP rear mount car has found that stock manis and wrapping the exhaust from the manifolds back is the way to go. The LT's are the biggest problem problem though. Also what are you using in the way of scavange pump? The stock pump from STS is garbage. You will also want to ditch the speed adjustment system for the pump. The oil return to the oil cap is also questionable at best. You will want to come up with a better PCV system than what STS sends as well. Nothing else comes to mind right off. I'm in the middle of getting the last couple peices for my setup right now but I've researched the crap out of it
#17
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
13 Posts
8-10 psi, the piston went completely caput at part throttle at around 3500rpm, before i even hit full throttle. Mind you, my car was dynoed as making 413hp at the wheels prior to this build, so hard to say how much power i made at the time of the "injury".
#18
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
1 Post
My $0.02. As mentioned above, 6.0 heads would be the way to go. C/R around 9.5 should be no problem with forged internals.... and will help a bit on low end torque before the boost kicks in.
You have a couple things hurting you. 3.90 gears are too much. 3.23's would be better to load the engine and build boost faster. Stock manifolds will also retain heat much better than LT's and will build boost much faster. Wrapping the I-pipe helps too.
If rebuilding, swap the oil cap return to an AN fitting in the pan or timing chain cover. Much more reliable. A vented catch can (ditching the STS PCV bypass is also a better setup. Ditching the stock STS bilge pump for a MOCAL return pump is HIGHLY recommended.
I'd also run a 2-bar SD tune on it with 60lb injectors and a high-volume pump. Conservative tuning and not getting greedy on timing is how to make the engine live happily at 10-12PSI.
I attached a thread I made concerning the oil pump for your reference too.
Good luck. Your goal is definetaly obtainable.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...ust-pipes.html
You have a couple things hurting you. 3.90 gears are too much. 3.23's would be better to load the engine and build boost faster. Stock manifolds will also retain heat much better than LT's and will build boost much faster. Wrapping the I-pipe helps too.
If rebuilding, swap the oil cap return to an AN fitting in the pan or timing chain cover. Much more reliable. A vented catch can (ditching the STS PCV bypass is also a better setup. Ditching the stock STS bilge pump for a MOCAL return pump is HIGHLY recommended.
I'd also run a 2-bar SD tune on it with 60lb injectors and a high-volume pump. Conservative tuning and not getting greedy on timing is how to make the engine live happily at 10-12PSI.
I attached a thread I made concerning the oil pump for your reference too.
Good luck. Your goal is definetaly obtainable.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...ust-pipes.html