Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

does compressor side affect spool at all?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2010, 12:23 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default does compressor side affect spool at all?

Say you have three different turbos

80mm,88mm and 94mm, but the turbine side is exactly the same. Would spool be effectively the same between the three turbos?
Old 11-17-2010, 01:01 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
HydroStream6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

No they will be different. Larger comp wheels are heavier and harder to turn. Larger comp wheels bring larger comp housings which in then take longer to pressurize as well.
Old 11-17-2010, 02:50 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by HydroStream6
No they will be different. Larger comp wheels are heavier and harder to turn. Larger comp wheels bring larger comp housings which in then take longer to pressurize as well.
that sounds reasonable. how big of an effect would the compressor have, vs the turbine side.
Old 11-17-2010, 03:39 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
HydroStream6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

From my experience, the cold side does have less of an effect than the hot side. On my current vehicle, I've run 3 different turbos. A T60 and a T70 which were both P trims on the turbine, and a TC76 which is an F1 on the turbine side. There seemed to be less of a difference between the T60 and the T70 than the T70 and the TC76.

Keep in mind I have no boost/dyno graphs to back this up, this is just my experience on my vehicle. Your mileage may very.

What is your specific application? Or are you just wondering in general?
Old 11-17-2010, 07:58 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

im faced with a choice between t70s or t60s on a 5.3

same hotside so i was wondering if spool would be same but it sounds like the 60s will spool faster
Old 11-18-2010, 10:03 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
topend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 71 chevy
Say you have three different turbos

80mm,88mm and 94mm, but the turbine side is exactly the same. Would spool be effectively the same between the three turbos?
no difference in spool. The turbine is what effects spool.
Old 11-18-2010, 11:00 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
MR2liter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: DFW Tx
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by topend
no difference in spool. The turbine is what effects spool.
Old 11-19-2010, 07:44 AM
  #8  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MR2liter
X2

the size ratio between the compressor and turbine plays a big role in spooling, surging, ect
Old 11-19-2010, 10:04 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
killernoodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by HydroStream6
No they will be different. Larger comp wheels are heavier and harder to turn. Larger comp wheels bring larger comp housings which in then take longer to pressurize as well.
The time it takes a charge pipe to pressurize is miniscule, so that isn't a factor. Spool is determined by how long it takes to accelerate the wheels up to speed. The larger the wheels, the more air they can potentially flow, but the slower they can spin up to speed. A smaller turbine wheel could cause a faster spool because of reduced mass and more exhaust velocity, but excessive backpressure is a bad thing. A smaller impellor makes for a faster spool because of reduced mass, but it won't be able to flow as much air.

Its a fairly simple really.
Old 11-19-2010, 12:47 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

also, just thinking out loud here - apart from the weight of the compressor side itself, doesnt the compressor impart a load on the turbo by trying to move all that air, so wouldnt it stand to reason that a compressor that moves more air with its bigger blades would also put more of a load on the exhaust side, resulting in slower boost?

again, just thinking out loud
Old 11-19-2010, 01:17 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
HydroStream6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Exactly.
Old 11-19-2010, 07:28 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
topend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 71 chevy
also, just thinking out loud here - apart from the weight of the compressor side itself, doesnt the compressor impart a load on the turbo by trying to move all that air, so wouldnt it stand to reason that a compressor that moves more air with its bigger blades would also put more of a load on the exhaust side, resulting in slower boost?

again, just thinking out loud
bigger compressors are capable of putting more load on the turbine because they could flow more than a smaller compressor. Spin the bigger compressor to flow like a smaller compressor, will require the nearly same amount of load on the same turbine.

why does the PT88 t4 spools faster than a GT47-88mm t6????? both turbos use 88mm compressors??
Old 11-19-2010, 08:35 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by topend
bigger compressors are capable of putting more load on the turbine because they could flow more than a smaller compressor. Spin the bigger compressor to flow like a smaller compressor, will require the nearly same amount of load on the same turbine.

why does the PT88 t4 spools faster than a GT47-88mm t6????? both turbos use 88mm compressors??
would that have to do with the inducer/exducer relationship?

interesting reading on this. dont know if this is science or bullshiz but its interesting

http://hondaswap.com/general-tech-ma...ulator-174676/
Old 11-19-2010, 08:42 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
HydroStream6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

We are really splitting hairs at this point. I think we all agree that turbine side effects spool more than the compressor side, but the compressor side still will have an effect.

Think of it this way as well. For every rotation of the turbine wheel, it still has to turn whatever is on the other side.
Old 11-19-2010, 09:05 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
CarsandWomen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: houston TX
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by topend
why does the PT88 t4 spools faster than a GT47-88mm t6????? both turbos use 88mm compressors??
your comparing two very different turbos, designed for different engines. the exact same turbo will spool different on 2 350 cid motors if one 350 is short stroke big bore vs. one with small bore long stroke

the t4 pt-88 spools different than the gt47-88, and the only thing thats different is the shapes of the wheels and housings *to my knowledge.
Old 01-02-2012, 11:40 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

as an update, the compressor side definitely had an effect on the spool.

twin t70s on a 4.8 , 3400 rpms to positive territory
twin t60s on a 4.8 ,3050 rpms to positive territory.

NOTHING else was changed
Old 01-02-2012, 04:05 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
iTrader: (20)
 
So.jerZ-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

go twin 70's with a 68 a/r if 347 and 81 a/r with 400+ is what I would do.
Old 01-02-2012, 05:38 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Boo"SS"t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: somewhere in Ohio
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 71 chevy
as an update, the compressor side definitely had an effect on the spool.

twin t70s on a 4.8 , 3400 rpms to positive territory
twin t60s on a 4.8 ,3050 rpms to positive territory.

NOTHING else was changed
I'm just curious. Could you be more specific on what were these results from? like what tranny, turbine wheel and turbine housing a/r?
Old 01-02-2012, 11:54 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Boo"SS"t
I'm just curious. Could you be more specific on what were these results from? like what tranny, turbine wheel and turbine housing a/r?
th400 trans, 60mm vs 70mm wheel, and both .68 ar
Old 01-03-2012, 11:11 AM
  #20  
Staging Lane
 
bmech211's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: F22 Secret Lair (aka) The "Austin Millbarge"
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 71 chevy
also, just thinking out loud here - apart from the weight of the compressor side itself, doesnt the compressor impart a load on the turbo by trying to move all that air, so wouldnt it stand to reason that a compressor that moves more air with its bigger blades would also put more of a load on the exhaust side, resulting in slower boost?

again, just thinking out loud
Also keep in mind that as engine load, VE, and boost increase so does the thermodynamic load on the turbine wheel by way of higher gas pressure and temperature. This in itself is enough to overcome most "boost related" rotational loads granted you're not stalling the compressor (surging).


Quick Reply: does compressor side affect spool at all?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.