Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Truck manifolds vs. ss turbo headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2010, 08:57 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
softballnrd27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Truck manifolds vs. ss turbo headers

What are the advantages/disadvantages of using one or the other? I know the turbo headers are way more expensive, but are they really worth it? They look bad ***, that's for sure!!
Old 12-06-2010, 11:33 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Headers:
-Bling
-Keeping A/C
-Better routing options for pipes

Manifolds:
-Cheap
-Work to well in the 7's
-Cheap
-Sturdy
-Cheap

Did I mention the maifolds were cheap.
Old 12-07-2010, 06:28 AM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (64)
 
dschmittie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not sure if Josh mentioned it but the manifolds are Cheap.

But in all seriousness they are proven to work well and car have run very impressive number. But the Turbo headers allow you to control where the outlets are and can work with keeping factory accesories in stock locations
Old 12-07-2010, 10:30 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
 
2001WS6Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

IMHO because the gases get bottled up at the rather small entrance to the turbo the advantages of flow from headers is negated. Heat retention with the cast manifolds is better too. Also they're pretty cheap.
Old 12-07-2010, 10:36 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
jfg455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: nh
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

but with header style you can choose the length and placement of the primary tubes as they go into the turbo itself. If you are running a single turbo with a Y pipe then it doesn't matter as much as if you were running twin turbos. There are theroies out there as to how the pulse of each tube and placement in the flange effects how the turbine spins and its efficiancy. And the motor is still an air pump so primary lengths do still play a part. but it is up to you what you are looking for for power, cost, looks, etc. That will determine what you run. Just my $.02
Old 12-07-2010, 10:54 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
bravolistick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: WHERE UNCLE SAM SAYS
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cast FTW, only things moved in my goat were the radiator, and battery.
Old 12-07-2010, 10:59 AM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (64)
 
dschmittie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2001WS6Vert
IMHO because the gases get bottled up at the rather small entrance to the turbo the advantages of flow from headers is negated. Heat retention with the cast manifolds is better too. Also they're pretty cheap.
But you also need to remember that to help spool you want to keep the temps in AND keep velocity of the exhaust gas up. So a large tube header will actuall hurt spool on a turbo car. This is why guys like Fireball and Phill only have 1 5/8 primaries and 2.5 cross over pipes feeding a T6 106mm turbo
Old 12-07-2010, 11:50 AM
  #8  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Headers have the ability to help with spool time if properly designed, length can be a tuning tool to help the driver stage a slightly tighter converter or larger AR than the manifold deal. That being said the manifolds are cheap and work well.

Kurt
Old 12-07-2010, 12:43 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
 
MISTERIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

turbo headers are nice but that it imo
Old 12-07-2010, 02:15 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
softballnrd27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have an 85 Truck that I am building w/o AC or power steering so accessories don't matter. I should have plenty of room for routing. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't short changing myself.
Old 12-07-2010, 02:28 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
 
MISTERIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by softballnrd27
I have an 85 Truck that I am building w/o AC or power steering so accessories don't matter. I should have plenty of room for routing. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't short changing myself.
u can also go with a log
Old 12-07-2010, 11:38 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
1fastlsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: the great state
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

josh what the cost on turbo headers now days
Old 12-08-2010, 07:43 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dschmittie1
But you also need to remember that to help spool you want to keep the temps in AND keep velocity of the exhaust gas up. So a large tube header will actuall hurt spool on a turbo car. This is why guys like Fireball and Phill only have 1 5/8 primaries and 2.5 cross over pipes feeding a T6 106mm turbo

actually 1 3/4 primaries...want to at least match the exhaust ports...
Old 12-08-2010, 08:03 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
jfg455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: nh
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes but in your case you are flowing way more CFM through your motor than most of us. Everything must be matched in any system for it to work well
Old 12-08-2010, 09:55 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I had a set of tubular headers I made for the 5.3 in my Nova. I took the engine out and put in my TA with manifolds... spooled 500rpms sooner and lost nothing on the top end.
Old 12-08-2010, 12:38 PM
  #16  
Turbo Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
RICE ETR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Kind of hard to see in the cell phone pics but you can keep A/C, acc's in stock location and have all the piping over the k-member with manifolds if you have a tubular k-member...which can be bought with the money saved by not buying/making headers....it also offsets some of the weight.
Oh, nobody mentioned manifolds are cheap...that's another bonus.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...turbo-kit.html
Attached Thumbnails Truck manifolds vs. ss turbo headers-1989770_600.jpg  
Old 12-08-2010, 11:11 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
5w20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston , Tx
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pwrtrip75
I had a set of tubular headers I made for the 5.3 in my Nova. I took the engine out and put in my TA with manifolds... spooled 500rpms sooner and lost nothing on the top end.
Spool is going to be better on a 6.0 compared to a 5.3
Old 12-09-2010, 08:46 AM
  #18  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

For a big motor 427"+ we've had good luck with 1 3/4" and a 2.5" crossover. These would work on a smaller motor but I think there could be some gains to be seen with smaller tubes that would keep the velocity of the airflow higher closer matching what we're seeing now. You need a header that does not shroud the exhaust port, most of the exhaust ports are 1.6 x 1.4 for most of the street heads so a 1 5/8" would work without shrouding the port.

If I were to build 1 5/8" headers, I would open up the hole on the exhaust flange and have the ends of the tubes flared just slightly larger so its got a taper. Sure its a path less traveled but I think there are gains to be had on the smaller motors.

Just a few years ago it was not uncommon to see 1 5/8" headers on a 350" motor but the market wanted more horsepower and 1 3/4" came to be popular but on most of the dynos, the 1 5/8" showed the same or more torque at a lower RPM(600-800). The turbo will take care of the top end, fix the bottom end power curve and it should rock.
Old 12-09-2010, 09:42 AM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (91)
 
MUSTANGBRKR02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I have a set of both so you can come check them out if you want. Just hit me up on rwhp.us
Old 12-09-2010, 11:41 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (53)
 
White.Lightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aston, PA
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I agree with what everyone has said. I personally plan on using the truck manifolds because they are cheap and WELL within my power goals LOL


Quick Reply: Truck manifolds vs. ss turbo headers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 AM.