Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

turbo or procharger on 5.3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2011, 04:29 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
nalls426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default turbo or procharger on 5.3?

im currently building a 5.3l for my 1991 camaro and i plan on doing a procharger or turbo and im not quite sure which one to go with yet. i have always liked running prochargers because you dont have to worry so much about bearings going out inside like a turbo and all the heat, but i have never ran a turbo before and i see a lot of people running them on ls series motors. what do you think i would be better off with?
Old 09-25-2011, 04:42 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
KrisXpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

These threads will never really help you decide.. People will come in and tell you what they enjoy.

When it comes down to it, how much money do you want to spend? Whats your mechanical skill level? Do you have the space/tools?

I have a APS Twin lsx trans am and a Procharged/Nitrous lsx Camaro in the garage and have more than an earful about both..

Turbo cars and procharged cars are both enjoyable..

The procharged car has had belt slip issues, and that is it.. I can pull the procharger off to change a belt and pulley in about 15 minutes with 5 or 6 tools.. Installation was also easy..

The turbo car... to put it lightly has been a absolute nightmare... when it runs and is spot on it makes all the time and effort worth it. The Cool/Fun factor of a turbo car more than makes up for the complex setup / constant tweaking.. Plus I dont mind working out bugs and problem solving.
The following users liked this post:
Breezee 87 (01-18-2021)
Old 09-26-2011, 01:24 AM
  #3  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
trav-tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: san diego ca.
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

turbo
Old 09-26-2011, 05:02 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
TheGreat4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

they both are plenty capable of good power, it's just a matter of preference i guess you could say.

personally i like turbos because they catch people off guard and also let you drive normal without downing gallons of gas every mile.
Old 09-26-2011, 11:28 AM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
nalls426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very true to all of that, I have PLENTY of space and room to do it at my shop and I'm not to worried about gas at all it won't be my everyday car after this motor swap, but what I'm leaning toward is that the procharger is a lot easier to deal with instead of running all the pipes for the turbo when you don't have very much room and ground clearence
Old 09-29-2011, 02:18 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
KrisXpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TheGreat4.8
personally i like turbos because they catch people off guard and also let you drive normal without downing gallons of gas every mile.
This is inaccurate FYI. You can retain gas mileage with a blower out of boost nearly the same as a turbo. There are always exceptions with bigger blowers but at that point gas mileage isn't really a concern.

Bob and EPP can vouch that some people have seen an increase in normal out of boost driving condition gas mileage.


When it comes down to it they are both enjoyable.
The following users liked this post:
Breezee 87 (01-18-2021)
Old 09-29-2011, 02:28 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
KrisXpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nalls426
Very true to all of that, I have PLENTY of space and room to do it at my shop and I'm not to worried about gas at all it won't be my everyday car after this motor swap, but what I'm leaning toward is that the procharger is a lot easier to deal with instead of running all the pipes for the turbo when you don't have very much room and ground clearence

Prochargers will have nearly identical plumbing to a turbo minus the hot side.

Highly recommend if you go the procharger route spend the money on a nice bracket/tensioner setup and avoid belt slip.
The following users liked this post:
Breezee 87 (01-18-2021)
Old 10-13-2011, 06:42 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
johnny walker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: virginia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

have a procharger, what they are saying about gas is absolutely not true. & my supercharger is not noisy & you don't have to listen to waste gates . some people like that. still it's about preference. superchargers easier to install
Old 10-13-2011, 06:44 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
 
johnny walker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: virginia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

turbos will cause vehicle to burn more fuel than a supercharger , do some research.
Old 11-05-2011, 04:11 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
nalls426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

there are mixed reviews on gas wise for turbos and superchargers i have people tell me all the time that better gas with a turbo but then again its all in how much boost your running also, but to me a procharger is deffinetly the way to go now for sure
Old 11-05-2011, 05:03 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
fatmat80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: oakland, ca
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If you want to make power than MPG should be the last thing on your mind. Each kit has there pros and cons. I went with procharger because of ease of maintanence. They moth make big power, they both sound great. Both kits have issues, the question is which ones do you want to deal with. Good luck with your choice...My suggestion find someone local to you that have turbo and blown cars, pick their brain, go for a ride or two and make your decision.
Old 11-05-2011, 05:13 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
SnIpEz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 979
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I vote Procharger personally.

Food for thought, and I think the majority of both forms of FI owners would agree, Prochargers have a lot less issues and are much easier to work on
The following users liked this post:
Breezee 87 (01-18-2021)
Old 11-05-2011, 07:00 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I built a Procharger bracket for use of a p600b head unit. Plus all of the accessory brackets, anyway. This allowed me to run just wp,alternator and blower off the 6rib belt off stock crank pulley. Went with S10 manual steering box.
U may want to consider a drive minus ps, since 3rd gens can run with manual gear boxes. Frees up some Hp and really gives that nice firm steering



Quick Reply: turbo or procharger on 5.3?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.