Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

5.3L build 862 vs 317 heads (compression)??

Old 11-23-2011, 01:50 PM
  #41  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
black06g85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have a set of 5.3 heads too. might run those, I dunno yet. we'll see what happens.
Old 07-18-2012, 10:12 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
Bob Niles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 5.3l

Hey I never was much a turbo fan but mostly because of the disasters if improperly installed but i was looking at twin turbo for my 5.3L 2000 chevy silverado 4x4 ls and a cam upgrade possibly new heads. I have headers and flow masters for exhaust and a cold air intake from Is3, monitored with hypertech max what would be a good compression if I bore it out to accommodate the twin turbo and a lil spray
Old 03-21-2017, 04:18 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
1994silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 5.3 twin turbo

I'm looking to build a 2002 5.3l chevy. I'm going to carborate it and put twin 76mm turbos on it. Bottom end is stock. What heads are best for that? Apparently 317 heads are too low compression? Will the stock heads shaved 30 thousandths work fine? It has 11.1 compression now. How much boost can I run on pump 93 non ethanol?
Old 03-21-2017, 07:03 PM
  #44  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
MY_2K_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1994silverado
I'm looking to build a 2002 5.3l chevy. I'm going to carborate it and put twin 76mm turbos on it. Bottom end is stock. What heads are best for that? Apparently 317 heads are too low compression? Will the stock heads shaved 30 thousandths work fine? It has 11.1 compression now. How much boost can I run on pump 93 non ethanol?
If it's stock it doesn't have 11.1 cr. Why would you remove the fuel injection. Seems back asswards to me. Twin 76s on a 5.3 is pointless
Old 03-21-2017, 07:29 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
1994silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MY_2K_Z
If it's stock it doesn't have 11.1 cr. Why would you remove the fuel injection. Seems back asswards to me. Twin 76s on a 5.3 is pointless
twin 76s on a 5.3 will actually build about 780 hp.
Old 03-21-2017, 08:18 PM
  #46  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sutherlin OR
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 1994silverado
twin 76s on a 5.3 will actually build about 780 hp.
One 76mm turbo with a 75mm turbine will make 780 hp. Twin 76mm turbos on a 5.3 will be lagggggg city, even with tiny 65mm turbines.
Old 03-23-2017, 09:39 AM
  #47  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
The BallSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,667
Received 496 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

I did some quick calculations and a LM7 with flat top pistons, cometic .040" MLS head gaskets and 317's w/ a 72cc chamber should net a 9.52:1 compression ratio.
Down slightly from 9.8:1 on a LS1 w/ the same 317's.
That reduction doesn't seem too bad at all for a street car and would allow a touch more boost.
Thoughts?
Old 03-23-2017, 12:51 PM
  #48  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The ******
I did some quick calculations and a LM7 with flat top pistons, cometic .040" MLS head gaskets and 317's w/ a 72cc chamber should net a 9.52:1 compression ratio.
Down slightly from 9.8:1 on a LS1 w/ the same 317's.
That reduction doesn't seem too bad at all for a street car and would allow a touch more boost.
Thoughts?
I think you did your quick math incorrectly. Compression will be lower I'd think.

If a flat top LC9 with 64.4cc heads is 9.6:1. Add 6.5ccs with the 317 heads and subtract a cc or so for the .010 thinner head gasket. You'd around 9:1. If you mill the 317's .030 and you'd be in better shape. I just milled a set and it cost me $75.
Old 03-23-2017, 01:58 PM
  #49  
TECH Enthusiast
 
SteenH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Moose Jaw SK, Canada
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by The ******
I did some quick calculations and a LM7 with flat top pistons, cometic .040" MLS head gaskets and 317's w/ a 72cc chamber should net a 9.52:1 compression ratio.
Down slightly from 9.8:1 on a LS1 w/ the same 317's.
That reduction doesn't seem too bad at all for a street car and would allow a touch more boost.
Thoughts?
I also believe you're too high on your calculations.
Old 03-23-2017, 04:46 PM
  #50  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
roastin240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1994silverado
twin 76s on a 5.3 will actually build about 780 hp.
Ha ha I love how specific this is. I wish I had more room in my signature for this post
Old 03-23-2017, 05:19 PM
  #51  
TECH Regular
 
Dimeomboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Emory Texas currently
Posts: 484
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1994silverado
twin 76s on a 5.3 will actually build about 780 hp.
wow I didn't know it was this easy now just throw them on and stop tuning when u see 780hp seems simple enough wonder y the forced induction section is full of new help me with my turbo build threads every day
Old 03-23-2017, 06:56 PM
  #52  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
The BallSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,667
Received 496 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
I think you did your quick math incorrectly. Compression will be lower I'd think.

If a flat top LC9 with 64.4cc heads is 9.6:1. Add 6.5ccs with the 317 heads and subtract a cc or so for the .010 thinner head gasket. You'd around 9:1. If you mill the 317's .030 and you'd be in better shape. I just milled a set and it cost me $75.
A l33 5.3 with flat top pistons, .051 gasket and 64.4cc heads is 10.1:1 compression per GM.
Add a .040 head gasket and 72cc heads I get 9.5:1 compression per the calculator I'm using.
What am I missing?
Old 03-23-2017, 07:13 PM
  #53  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
The BallSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,667
Received 496 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

According to GM the bore is smaller and the chamber is bigger??




Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 5.3L build 862 vs 317 heads (compression)??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM.