Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Burnt a piston in my LQ4, gonna try same setup with a 5.3 to compare

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2012, 10:06 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Luke Skyjacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Burnt a piston in my LQ4, gonna try same setup with a 5.3 to compare

I decided to make my own thread on this topic to do a comparison. I'm going to paste the relevant info and comments from the other thread found here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...h-boost-3.html

Original post:


About a week and a half ago I burnt a piston in my JY 6.0. The fastest it went was 10.75 @ 131 in my 3600# cutlass. I'm gonna swap to a JY 5.3 with the same exact setup and compare the two.


Mods:
LS6 cam
Springs & pushrods to match
Victor Jr intake
750 blow thru carb

Garrett GT42-94R
Open 4" downpipe about 5 feet long.

It went 10.75 with a powerglide, car now has a th400
Anyone care to venture a guess of if I will gain or lose ET?

Originally Posted by jridenour31
What heads?
Originally Posted by Luke Skyjacker
I had 317s on the 6.0
I'm not sure what the 5.3 has yet until I get it.

Im buying the 5.3 for $350. I got a buyer lined up for my hurt 6.0 for $250.
Originally Posted by o2camaross
Get that 60' down and you shouldn't lose any e.t. My 4200lb truck ran 10.97 @ 125 with a 5.3 and baby on3 turbo.

There is no reason to go with a 6.0 with the power these 5.3's are making. You can buy 3 for the price of one 6.0. That 7675 would be perfect for a 5.3 and has the capability to make 900rwhp.
Originally Posted by 71 chevy
at the same psi, you will go slower. add a few pounds of boost and it will e.t the same.



i have the 99-03 6.0 rod piston combos if your buyer needs one or more.$15 plus shipping
Old 10-26-2012, 10:16 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Luke Skyjacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some info on the turbo:
Ball bearing Garrett GT42-94R
Compressor Specs:
Inducer = 70.3mm
Exducer = 94mm
Trim = 56
AR = 0.60
Turbine Specs:
Wheel dia = 82mm
Trim = 84
AR = 1.44 T6 flange

The exhaust housing comes with a 5" vband outlet. I welded a 4" vband to the inside of that so I could run a open 4" down pipe.


I had two 4" diesel glass pack style mufflers on it at one point. This added in the ball park of 65# and turned out to be extremely restrictive. I lost 6mph in the 1/8th by just adding this exhaust.

I think the above point really illustrates the fact that the 6.0 was waaaaay to big for this turbo. It would run out of breath at 5700 and was struggling to get to 6000 where I shifted.
I don't think that the 5.3 will make more power in EVERY case, especially when the turbo is spec'd for the engine....BUT I think that swapping to a 5.3 will pick up power and ET in my case because of how the lower displacement will be easier to move through that exhaust turbine.
Old 10-26-2012, 10:23 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Luke Skyjacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another factor to consider:

My car went a best of 10.75 @ 131 with a powerglide off of a 1.80 sixty.
Even after replicating that 60' with a th400 it wouldnt run better than 11.00's.

At one point I put on a set of 26" slicks and had a 1.60. But the car was several mph off due to the mufflers I had added that week. Even so, I doubt it would have run the same ET as it had with the glide.

I believe the reason for this is that I was in the mid rpm torque for much longer with the glide rather than the higher rpm with the th400 where the turbo couldn't keep up with the exhaust demands of the 6.0
Old 10-26-2012, 10:28 AM
  #4  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

So you are going to compare the size of the holes in the pistons of the 5.3l and 6.0L???? If you tune it the same as the 6l the 5.3l pistons will just be ashtrays too lol.
Old 10-26-2012, 10:41 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Luke Skyjacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
So you are going to compare the size of the holes in the pistons of the 5.3l and 6.0L???? If you tune it the same as the 6l the 5.3l pistons will just be ashtrays too lol.
Haha... Very true ********.

I guess I should have made some kind of comment about why it burnt a piston....

I believe the float level was low in the carb. I also swapped I truck thermostat in for the restrictor I had before that. The car got very hot during that pass and may have been boiling the fuel in the bowls. The previous pass before it torched the piston it was a little rich, then the next pass it nosed over around 1000' and I looked at the wideband to see 14.3 when I lifted.

I do plan to address the obious issue with the tune.
Old 10-26-2012, 10:54 AM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
IH8FORD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't know which will be better but I can come get the 6.0 today if the buyer falls through. I sold my 408 and I'm going turbo. With a forged rod and piston 6.0.
Old 10-26-2012, 02:44 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Luke Skyjacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll keep that in mind
Old 10-26-2012, 03:02 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

In for results and impressions.
Old 10-27-2012, 07:10 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Luke Skyjacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by overhere
i had a cam only lq9 with pt7675 ran 152mph @ 15psi killed #1 piston. swapped everything same cam and all on to a 5.3l car went 142 mph @ 22psi until it spun the main bearings.
What kind of car?



Quick Reply: Burnt a piston in my LQ4, gonna try same setup with a 5.3 to compare



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.