Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

procharger friendly cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2012, 08:57 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default procharger friendly cams?

so ive decided on a f1 procharger for my forged ls swap and now im looking for a centri-blower friendly cam to match. heads are more than likely going to be 317 heads as ive heard they are great for boost. power goals are min 650rwhp to max 800rwhp, with a matching torque curve.
Old 07-19-2012, 09:51 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
josepy121380's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you have the right tuner you do not need to run such low compression.

I love the brute speed cam that I have in my car.

http://shop.brutespeed.com/Brute-Spe...d-Camshaft.htm
Old 07-19-2012, 10:32 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (17)
 
02LS1ram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lehigh Valley ,PA
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have the brute speed cam also and it works great!!! You can't go wrong with it
Old 07-19-2012, 12:10 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
I8UR4RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bama
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

brutespeed blower here as well. Also the 228r is good, ECS has one, thunder racing sells one, but they all kind of fall short of the brutespeed one IMO.
Old 07-19-2012, 12:27 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
 
4kiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southwest MO
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just ordered the same cam, going in my stock shortblock LS1 with F1A. Can't wait to put it in and hear it.
Old 07-19-2012, 12:30 PM
  #6  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I'm running a 227/235 on a 113lsa and it works really well. Great overall driving experience with it.
Old 07-19-2012, 01:52 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4kiro
Just ordered the same cam, going in my stock shortblock LS1 with F1A. Can't wait to put it in and hear it.
ls1 block and a f1? from what ive heard thats not a good combo, the cylinder walls are too thin and shred like wet paper past 600rwhp or so.
Old 07-19-2012, 02:02 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
ls2 goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOVA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by usnfenix
ls1 block and a f1? from what ive heard thats not a good combo, the cylinder walls are too thin and shred like wet paper past 600rwhp or so.
You heard wrong.
Old 07-19-2012, 02:48 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls2 goat
You heard wrong.
youve got data to back it up? ive got two ls1 blocks in my garage that im not using for the swap based on this info. most searches on this site yeild that its not a good idea based on my power goals. sure i see lots of guys with stock bottom end ls1 blocks and maggies or p1sc's but how many on f1's? im telling you some people say its in the tune but the ls1 block wasnt made to take 850rwhp.
Old 07-19-2012, 03:07 PM
  #10  
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
RacerBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Posts: 209
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

OP, I have a nice blower cam for sale that I used with my 402 and F1A. It made 760rwhp and drove better than my old H/C/I LS1.

Oh and I have see plenty of LS1 pushed past the 700HP. Cylinder wall ARE NOT TOO THIN.
Old 07-19-2012, 03:56 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

My understanding is that the issue with stock shortblock LS1s (over 700 rwhp) is not the cylinder walls themselves, but the pistons and connecting rods. When that lets go, its a mess. Maybe a few too many connecting rods ripping up the cylinders has created a myth about the cylinder walls in general being too thin. But I guess there are some out there that have been successful pushing the limits.

(RacerBill... just for clarifications sake, are you talking about stock piston LS1s pushed past 700 RWHP? Thanks in advance!!)
Old 07-19-2012, 04:04 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HRHohio
My understanding is that the issue with stock shortblock LS1s (over 700 rwhp) is not the cylinder walls themselves, but the pistons and connecting rods. When that lets go, its a mess. Maybe a few too many connecting rods ripping up the cylinders has created a myth about the cylinder walls in general being too thin. But I guess there are some out there that have been successful pushing the limits.

(RacerBill... just for clarifications sake, are you talking about stock piston LS1s pushed past 700 RWHP? Thanks in advance!!)
well if i built a ls1 it would be full forged internals of course

my concern is power. what with the ls1 being a good motor but it has been replaced by ls2,3 even the ls7. my thinking is why build a forged ls1 when i can build a forged ls2 and make more power. the ls3 and 7 are outside the margin for how much id want to spend building just the motor/tranny. the vette needs money in other areas too.
Old 07-19-2012, 04:10 PM
  #13  
Customizing Director
iTrader: (12)
 
MadIceV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SW Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,778
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by usnfenix
youve got data to back it up? ive got two ls1 blocks in my garage that im not using for the swap based on this info. most searches on this site yeild that its not a good idea based on my power goals. sure i see lots of guys with stock bottom end ls1 blocks and maggies or p1sc's but how many on f1's? im telling you some people say its in the tune but the ls1 block wasnt made to take 850rwhp.
The crank is usually good to 900rwhp. The aluminum block is pretty strong as well, but a 6.0 iron block will be ideal if this is just a drag car. Regardless, you should run forged rods/pistons to handle the power past 500rwhp.

As for camshaft selection, take a look at Futral, particularly the F7. Speed Inc also has a nice selection of boost camshafts.

Last edited by MadIceV8; 07-19-2012 at 04:21 PM.
Old 07-19-2012, 04:14 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
vmapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by usnfenix
my thinking is why build a forged ls1 when i can build a forged ls2 and make more power. .
Well, just like in my situation, i coudnt wait, bought a 2005 CTS-V, which came with the LS6. Now I have a motor right there could pull and do up, or do I waste money to get an LS2, which I couldn't agree more, would be better...
347 or 370 ? Wish I waited for the 06... but I didnt.
I chose forged 347 w brutespeed blower cam but Im not using an F1, only a D-1SC....
Old 07-19-2012, 04:26 PM
  #15  
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
RacerBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Posts: 209
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

Originally Posted by HRHohio
My understanding is that the issue with stock shortblock LS1s (over 700 rwhp) is not the cylinder walls themselves, but the pistons and connecting rods. When that lets go, its a mess. Maybe a few too many connecting rods ripping up the cylinders has created a myth about the cylinder walls in general being too thin. But I guess there are some out there that have been successful pushing the limits.

(RacerBill... just for clarifications sake, are you talking about stock piston LS1s pushed past 700 RWHP? Thanks in advance!!)
No, I was talking about LS1 blocks, not stock pistons/rods/cranks.
Old 07-19-2012, 04:48 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MadIceV8
The crank is usually good to 900rwhp. The aluminum block is pretty strong as well, but a 6.0 iron block will be ideal if this is just a drag car. Regardless, you should run forged rods/pistons to handle the power past 500rwhp.

As for camshaft selection, take a look at Futral, particularly the F7. Speed Inc also has a nice selection of boost camshafts.
this will be a car that sees the strip maybe 3 times a year. it will be a weekend/sat night street car.

Originally Posted by RacerBill
No, I was talking about LS1 blocks, not stock pistons/rods/cranks.
if i can honest to god build the ls1 block to handle 650rwhp to i think i can tone it down to a max of 750rwhp in a 79 vette id rather do that, i know the ls1 better and already have a good deal of ls1 parts, plus two blocks. ( one is being used as a coffee table)
Old 07-19-2012, 04:57 PM
  #17  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

LS1 block will handle 650 no problem at all.

As for cams, it would be difficult to select a cam that would yield bad results on an LS.

Just pick a cam that gives you the driving characteristics you want, and the blower will just make it better.
Old 07-19-2012, 05:00 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
LS1 block will handle 650 no problem at all.

As for cams, it would be difficult to select a cam that would yield bad results on an LS.

Just pick a cam that gives you the driving characteristics you want, and the blower will just make it better.
yes maybe 650 at the crank but again im looking for 650 to the rear. with growing room to 750 to the rear once im used to driving/launching it.
Old 07-19-2012, 05:25 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 4kiro
Just ordered the same cam, going in my stock shortblock LS1 with F1A. Can't wait to put it in and hear it.
So just to summarize the block issue...

LS1 STOCK Shortblock (i.e. stock pistons/rods) max out around 650 rwhp on a good tune.

LS1 BUILT Shortblock (i.e. Forged pistons/rods) is good far beyond 700 rwhp on a good tune.

So... usnfenix if you're going forged anyway... not an issue...

4kiro.... unless you go forged... be careful...

Old 07-19-2012, 05:29 PM
  #20  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

nope, LS1 stock shortblock with boost is a burning fuse. It will fail...just not sure when.

From his posts, he just doesnt want to use an LS1 block which is his choice.

If on a tight budget, consider a 5.3 build.


Quick Reply: procharger friendly cams?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 PM.