6.0 317 heads on a gen 3 5.3... quick questions
#1
6.0 317 heads on a gen 3 5.3... quick questions
before i do this for research
what head gasket should i use, the 6.0 truck one, a ls1 5.7 gasket?
stock 5.3 truck gasket?
i actually have ls9 gaskets for that iron 370 im building but i would throw them on this motor if they fit for a trial
what head gasket should i use, the 6.0 truck one, a ls1 5.7 gasket?
stock 5.3 truck gasket?
i actually have ls9 gaskets for that iron 370 im building but i would throw them on this motor if they fit for a trial
#5
i have a set of ARP bolts and studs i could use. either or...
not sure if dropping the compression a whole point is worth it...
like i said i don't mind winding up this 80mm and pushing this 5.3 as high as the ignition system will let me go.
what do you guys think.
not sure if dropping the compression a whole point is worth it...
like i said i don't mind winding up this 80mm and pushing this 5.3 as high as the ignition system will let me go.
what do you guys think.
Trending Topics
#12
TECH Resident
Ahhhhh, right.... I'm thinking you're correct.
(Subscribing... also just picked up a 5.3 to drop into my "new" '72 Camaro.)
Was thinking of having the stock 5.3 heads ported and put in larger intake valve... ala "Hot Rod Magazine Big Bang Theory" "The stock 5.3L heads were ported by Total Engine Airflow and received larger intake valves and an appropriate spring upgrade." Link: http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...g_bang_theory/
I'm using that article as my inspiration, but I was thinking of milling the deck so it wouldn't be a dog down low...
===============================
"Because of deck thickness ?"
In a way... milling 317s down decreases piston to valve clearance. Limits the use of "BIG CAMS". But if you're using a moderate boost friendly cam, you can probably mill .020 off, get the compression back to 9.0, and still be clear. (I haven't run the numbers, so I'm just guestimating... don't hold me to it!
Plug the numbers in your calculator and see what it spits out.
(Subscribing... also just picked up a 5.3 to drop into my "new" '72 Camaro.)
Was thinking of having the stock 5.3 heads ported and put in larger intake valve... ala "Hot Rod Magazine Big Bang Theory" "The stock 5.3L heads were ported by Total Engine Airflow and received larger intake valves and an appropriate spring upgrade." Link: http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...g_bang_theory/
I'm using that article as my inspiration, but I was thinking of milling the deck so it wouldn't be a dog down low...
===============================
"Because of deck thickness ?"
In a way... milling 317s down decreases piston to valve clearance. Limits the use of "BIG CAMS". But if you're using a moderate boost friendly cam, you can probably mill .020 off, get the compression back to 9.0, and still be clear. (I haven't run the numbers, so I'm just guestimating... don't hold me to it!
Plug the numbers in your calculator and see what it spits out.
#14
TECH Resident
(of course, I'll be keeping it at a moderate 750 rwhp for longevity)... for now.
#16
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indy
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EDIT: However, you do have nitrous dont you Denmah?
#17
I would use the ls9s and your head studs. I would also have them checked for flatness(minimum amount milled) need a good surface to seal properly. You can reuse the studs when u do your 370 and the gaskets are 90-100 a pair, they are worth using. I have them on mine, skinnies has them on his. Just use them.
I thought a 5.3 with 71cc chambers yielded closer to 9.0-1 oh well. Boost>compression. You will probably not have to run any more boost as the amount of flow you will get will take the power up a lot. Good luck.
I thought a 5.3 with 71cc chambers yielded closer to 9.0-1 oh well. Boost>compression. You will probably not have to run any more boost as the amount of flow you will get will take the power up a lot. Good luck.
#19
Just went and did a comp calc and got 9.1:1.
You might have entered the 4.8 stroke to end up with 8.5:1. I would re check your numbers. 3.779 bore 3.622 stroke 71cc chamber .....flat tops? If you are using dished pistons that might get you to 8.5:1. Wasn't thinking about that. 8.5:1 isn't that bad. I think you are worrying too much about your compression. Those heads will pick u up a
Ton of power regardless of the compression.
You might have entered the 4.8 stroke to end up with 8.5:1. I would re check your numbers. 3.779 bore 3.622 stroke 71cc chamber .....flat tops? If you are using dished pistons that might get you to 8.5:1. Wasn't thinking about that. 8.5:1 isn't that bad. I think you are worrying too much about your compression. Those heads will pick u up a
Ton of power regardless of the compression.