Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Little Dissapointed With My Power Output, Would Like Some Opinions

Old 10-01-2012, 11:26 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
underpressureWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Little Dissapointed With My Power Output, Would Like Some Opinions

setup:

LS2 Block 365 C.I.
Stock crank
R&R steel billet rods
Manley forged pistons 10.1:1 compression
PRC 2.5 LS6 Heads .650 dual springs
East Coast Supercharging "big" blower cam (dont release exact specs)
80# injectors
Twin Bosch 340LPH in-tank fuel pumps
Aeromotive Boost referenced regulator

D1-SC with SDCE tensioner at 13.7#'s (7.25 crank pulley / 3.55 Blower Pulley)
ATI twin intercoolers (4.5 inch)

Snow Performance Stage 2 Water/Methanol injection (Dual Nozzle)
60% methanol 40%water

1-3/4 longtube headers
3 inch y-pipe (no cats)
borla catback (full open)

Performabuilt lvl 3 4l65e transmission
Yank PY3400 stall
PST 3.5 inch driveshaft
Moser 9-inch (3.50 gearset)

i attached my dyno graphs.

My builder is telling me the twin intercoolers are the reason im not at my 750rwhp goal and if i do a frontmount intercooler ill pick up the boost im losing along with switching over to pure methanol injection rather than my water/meth mix.

Im looking for opinions and help to get to my goal of 750-800 rear wheel horsepower. Thanks.
Attached Thumbnails Little Dissapointed With My Power Output, Would Like Some Opinions-1001021212.jpg   Little Dissapointed With My Power Output, Would Like Some Opinions-1001021213.jpg   Little Dissapointed With My Power Output, Would Like Some Opinions-1001021214.jpg  
Old 10-01-2012, 11:39 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
x275radial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the problem is you didnt put a turbo on it.
Old 10-01-2012, 11:49 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
underpressureWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Very helpful! lol any FI guys that can help me make my setup more efficient please chime in
Old 10-01-2012, 12:03 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
 
conor.davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well that auto isn't helpin you chase rwhp #'s I would think with that CR/heads/365ci/13psi you would have a little more power tho... Is the tune pretty conservative?

From what I have read you might be at the limit of
Those 4.5's if I were you I would put a big FMIC on it and sell the 4.5's and break even or make a few $$(unless you buy prochargers fmic then you will have to add $$)
Old 10-01-2012, 12:04 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
 
conor.davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Maybe try true duals or mufflex 4in too
Old 10-01-2012, 12:15 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

What A/F? Timing? Go run it at the track and get a MPH... dyno numbers are worthless and meaningless.
Old 10-01-2012, 12:20 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
3.8redbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Corpus Christi Texas
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

do you have before and after psi and iat?
Old 10-01-2012, 12:29 PM
  #8  
Closed ex-Sponsor Account
 
JHR Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I personally dont believe the twin 4.5s are where your not meeting your goal. We have a C5 at the shop right now that makes 875 to the tire through an auto and twin 4.5s on a 347. Granted it does have Trickflow heads, and an F1A. Not saying a front mount wouldnt help, but I dont believe that is your biggest issue.

What is the intake setup on the blower? If it is still what ATI sends in the kit, that is one restriction. Another would be your 1 3/4 headers. You will be pretty hard pressed to get 750+ RWHP out of that D1SC on a street build like this. If you are looking for those kind of numbers, I would recommend an F1A to better suit. The D1SC will have to be spun very hard, and be making a ton of heat to produce those kinds of numbers.

Zach
Old 10-01-2012, 12:45 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
underpressureWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

it is "conservative" according to my tuner but he said not "too conservative", i am planning on stepping up to a frontmount in spring but i do know of people making crazy power through the 4.5 twins... the inlet on the blower has the bigger 9 inch filter on it from brute speed and im going to add the small filter that attaches to the inlet hat itself
Old 10-01-2012, 12:45 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
underpressureWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im running an LS6 intake manifold as well
Old 10-01-2012, 12:47 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
underpressureWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i dont have the before and after psi and iat's..... ill see if i can find out
Old 10-01-2012, 01:01 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
js2fst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: K.C.
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Doesn't Skinnies run the same intercoolers
Old 10-01-2012, 01:33 PM
  #13  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Bob@BruteSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Roanoke, IN
Posts: 21,000
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

At the old shop we had a 2004 Corvette manual transmission with stock displacement, 9.5/1 compression, Lingenfelter GT2-3 cam, Patriot Stage 11 heads, Hooker shorty emission 1-3/4 headers, stock cats and a D-1SC at 16 psi. It made 740 rwhp on 93 octane and 100% methanol. This was using the 4.5" twin intercoolers.

Are you sure the water in the methanol mixture isn't putting the flame out? I'd try 100% methanol. I'd also drop down to a 3.40 pulley unless you're already at max impeller speed. You have to keep in mind you have a 3400 stall converter, you're not going to see great dyno numbers. Bob
__________________
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076

PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com

https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website


Old 10-01-2012, 02:24 PM
  #14  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Shawnee KS
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by js2fst
Doesn't Skinnies run the same intercoolers
We ran the 3.5" cores on the RX7 and LTD. We were seeing some pretty high IAT numbers on hot days at the track, so they were replaced with the 31x12x3 CX intercooler. This is also with a turbo, so not a real good comparison for a D1 car sense we can just up the boost where ever going down the track we want. We also changed quite a few things and didn't have a back to back comparison of the twin vs single intercooler for HP but it have lower IATs during hard boost pulls.
Old 10-01-2012, 03:43 PM
  #15  
Closed ex-Sponsor Account
 
JHR Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by underpressureWs6
it is "conservative" according to my tuner but he said not "too conservative", i am planning on stepping up to a frontmount in spring but i do know of people making crazy power through the 4.5 twins... the inlet on the blower has the bigger 9 inch filter on it from brute speed and im going to add the small filter that attaches to the inlet hat itself
Rig up a vacuum gauge on the inlet side of the blower, if it is pulling more than 1-2 in vacuum, that is a restriction. I believe you will be surprised with the results. A stock hat on a build we did was pulling 8 in of vacuum...huge restriction.

Zach
Old 10-01-2012, 07:18 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
I8UR4RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bama
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

^ great advice.


get the truck inlet hat....big filter and fmic....

add a cutout to those headers instead of running it through the full exhaust.

run 100% meth as mentioned.

your still able to pulley down. anything around 680-725rwhp on an auto stalled setup will be a win IMO.
Old 10-01-2012, 07:38 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Heintz Racing
Rig up a vacuum gauge on the inlet side of the blower, if it is pulling more than 1-2 in vacuum, that is a restriction. I believe you will be surprised with the results. A stock hat on a build we did was pulling 8 in of vacuum...huge restriction.

Zach
X3

I picked up 1.5 #'s on the stock hat by adding a filter to the by pass return hole and a bigger main filter. I'm only running a 3.7" pulley with the SDCE.

http://mycarpics.shutterfly.com/276

http://mycarpics.shutterfly.com/277#277

Last edited by conan; 10-01-2012 at 07:43 PM.
Old 10-02-2012, 01:13 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
underpressureWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yeah ive added the bigger main filter already, just have to do the filter on the bypass valve hole, I8UR4RD i agree, im just going to do the front mount with 100% meth and be happy because 680-720 wheel in a stalled auto is definitly a win
Old 10-02-2012, 01:30 PM
  #19  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
oneoverwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was going to say the single 3" exhaust.
Old 10-02-2012, 06:11 PM
  #20  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bob@BruteSpeed

Are you sure the water in the methanol mixture isn't putting the flame out? I'd try 100% methanol.
I run 60/40, there is no chance it's doing any harm IMO, and I'm spraying shitloads of it.

Water offers better detonation suppression and chamber cooling vs methanol.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Little Dissapointed With My Power Output, Would Like Some Opinions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 AM.