Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Tial Wastegate Springs: rating vs actual

Old 02-12-2013, 10:18 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
metoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Tial Wastegate Springs: rating vs actual

I have Tial 38mm wastegates running on spring pressure only. I have the large yellow (.7bar or 10.153psi) springs installed. Actual pressure (measured at the blowoff valve) max's out at 7.5psi. Is this typical? I've always used boost controllers in the past.
Old 02-12-2013, 11:47 PM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (24)
 
Speedy911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm sure spring fatigue, wastegate placement, vacuum source, excessive turbo/exhaust back pressure, wastegate sizing, and many other factors can influence it.

Where is your wastegate boost source coming from?

If spool and power seems normal and it is consistently doing that, I wouldn't be too worried about it. You have three choices, shim it, get a bigger spring, or throw on a boost controller.
Old 02-12-2013, 11:49 PM
  #3  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

sounds normal to me.
Old 02-13-2013, 10:21 AM
  #4  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by denmah
sounds normal to me.
Yup

What a spring will make is all about backpressure

Higher drive ratio the less boost, lower ratio the more boost a certain spring will make
Old 02-14-2013, 07:22 AM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
metoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dang it! Tial shouldn't refer to there springs in PSI ratings then. They should simply state the spring rate or some other system of description if they want to keep the rate a secret. Technically, I just wasted money on the springs then. While the turbos were out, I put in the higher rated spring and uninstalled my electronic boost controller since I figured I would never increase the boost and an EBC is just one more thing to fail. Oh well, since the waste gates are such a pain to get to on my setup, I guess an MBC is in order.
Old 02-14-2013, 10:26 AM
  #6  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Piping design/back pressure plays a big role on boost level out of the rated spring.
Old 02-14-2013, 10:40 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ajrothm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: League City, Tx
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Tial springs are rated correctly.. Your porting on the gate port/turbine housing will skew the results big time.. Not to mention your exhaust system after the turbo (aka back pressure).

On my bike with a short dump pipe (no restriction), here is what I see win various Tial springs:

Small red, 5.8lb : 6.00 psi
Big yellow, 10.15lb : 8.8-9.2 psi
Big blue, 14.5lb : 14.5 psi

Logged boost on two different map sensors... Identical results.
Old 02-14-2013, 10:52 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
cjmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

tial includes all of the springs so that you can fine tune for your setup.
Old 02-14-2013, 01:43 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
metoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajrothm
Tial springs are rated correctly.. Your porting on the gate port/turbine housing will skew the results big time.. Not to mention your exhaust system after the turbo (aka back pressure).

On my bike with a short dump pipe (no restriction), here is what I see win various Tial springs:

Small red, 5.8lb : 6.00 psi
Big yellow, 10.15lb : 8.8-9.2 psi
Big blue, 14.5lb : 14.5 psi

Logged boost on two different map sensors... Identical results.
Since there are so many apparent variables that effect the boost pressure, describing the spring by pressure is inaccurate, especially since they don't state the conditions of the rating. Like an engine that is rated at 300 bhp, a compound bow at 300fps IBO, or 4130 at 52ksi yield. There are stated conditions that go along with those numbers, which if recreated, same or similar data would result. Tial doesn't state the conditions, so they shouldn't use that method to describe the springs. That's my point.

For the engine: certain fuel type, power at the crank, no accessories, etc
For the Bow: 70lb draw weight, 30in draw, 350 grain arrow, ....
For the steel: annealed at 865 deg C

Last edited by metoo; 02-14-2013 at 01:48 PM.
Old 02-14-2013, 04:02 PM
  #10  
Staging Lane
 
TiAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

actually we state the springs are rated at 1:1 back pressure


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Tial Wastegate Springs: rating vs actual



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM.