Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Shooting for 3000 hp. Ideas and input

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2013, 04:26 PM
  #41  
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BMF_Racing
Please do so, would love to see that beast coming together!!!
Will do and thanks!!
Old 12-05-2013, 11:20 AM
  #42  
On The Tree
 
turbo_bu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central, IL
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

You might want to talk to hellbentS10. One of his posts mentions that they pickup up when they swapped over to running a magneto setup instead of the coils.
Old 12-05-2013, 11:50 AM
  #43  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (104)
 
helicoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,826
Received 266 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

3000HP LSX or 3000HP HEMI, BBC, 481X?
Things to think about - overall price and parts availability, maintenance, reliability, competitiveness, overall cool factor. Are you going to race 4 times a year, 10 times a year, 50 times a year?

Budget and this topic don't go together. Your either ALL in or not.

I think most hardcore heads up racers look at it from the long haul perspective. Look at where they can race and how often they can race and how competitive they can be. LSX racing is 4 events a year. You can make more power with a bigger, better more sturdy engine paltform to start with without running such 1 off custom parts and have more of shot to be competitive at other heads up events - but obviously not race the LSX stuff. At the LSX stuff, you can stand out more because there just aren't that many competitors. It would be different IMO if there was a FULL field showing up, but to warrant that cost for what it is there is a hard pill to swallow.

You have to look at why someone like Andreas or Major left the LS platform to move on to bigger and better things?

The likes of Kempf, Carlyle, Berry, etc. are in a class where money doesn't come hard (from the looks of it). To say you want to try and do it with less is just not being rational. There is no less - only more. No one is going to care if you saved 20K and run .2 slower.....

3000HP LSX's are cool, but practical......hmmm? Jury is out.

It is only money, just burn it!

FWIW, I just wonder if the Dart billet LSX will change the main design to that of the LS next in the future. Or is the main bulkhead in that block that much beefier than the regular LSX, RHS bottom end design where it is not a problem.
Old 12-05-2013, 05:22 PM
  #44  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sbcgenII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort hood
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by helicoil
3000HP LSX or 3000HP HEMI, BBC, 481X?
Things to think about - overall price and parts availability, maintenance, reliability, competitiveness, overall cool factor. Are you going to race 4 times a year, 10 times a year, 50 times a year?

Budget and this topic don't go together. Your either ALL in or not.

I think most hardcore heads up racers look at it from the long haul perspective. Look at where they can race and how often they can race and how competitive they can be. LSX racing is 4 events a year. You can make more power with a bigger, better more sturdy engine paltform to start with without running such 1 off custom parts and have more of shot to be competitive at other heads up events - but obviously not race the LSX stuff. At the LSX stuff, you can stand out more because there just aren't that many competitors. It would be different IMO if there was a FULL field showing up, but to warrant that cost for what it is there is a hard pill to swallow.

You have to look at why someone like Andreas or Major left the LS platform to move on to bigger and better things?

The likes of Kempf, Carlyle, Berry, etc. are in a class where money doesn't come hard (from the looks of it). To say you want to try and do it with less is just not being rational. There is no less - only more. No one is going to care if you saved 20K and run .2 slower.....

3000HP LSX's are cool, but practical......hmmm? Jury is out.

It is only money, just burn it!

FWIW, I just wonder if the Dart billet LSX will change the main design to that of the LS next in the future. Or is the main bulkhead in that block that much beefier than the regular LSX, RHS bottom end design where it is not a problem.
http://www.prolineracing.net/engines...h-alum-3250-hp
Old 12-05-2013, 10:14 PM
  #45  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
I8UR4RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bama
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

lots of time and sponsor money will get it done! good luck bud
Old 12-05-2013, 10:30 PM
  #46  
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by helicoil
3000HP LSX or 3000HP HEMI, BBC, 481X?
Things to think about - overall price and parts availability, maintenance, reliability, competitiveness, overall cool factor. Are you going to race 4 times a year, 10 times a year, 50 times a year?

Budget and this topic don't go together. Your either ALL in or not.

I think most hardcore heads up racers look at it from the long haul perspective. Look at where they can race and how often they can race and how competitive they can be. LSX racing is 4 events a year. You can make more power with a bigger, better more sturdy engine paltform to start with without running such 1 off custom parts and have more of shot to be competitive at other heads up events - but obviously not race the LSX stuff. At the LSX stuff, you can stand out more because there just aren't that many competitors. It would be different IMO if there was a FULL field showing up, but to warrant that cost for what it is there is a hard pill to swallow.

You have to look at why someone like Andreas or Major left the LS platform to move on to bigger and better things?

The likes of Kempf, Carlyle, Berry, etc. are in a class where money doesn't come hard (from the looks of it). To say you want to try and do it with less is just not being rational. There is no less - only more. No one is going to care if you saved 20K and run .2 slower.....

3000HP LSX's are cool, but practical......hmmm? Jury is out.

It is only money, just burn it!

FWIW, I just wonder if the Dart billet LSX will change the main design to that of the LS next in the future. Or is the main bulkhead in that block that much beefier than the regular LSX, RHS bottom end design where it is not a problem.
Valid points I've thought of. Tempted to go to a BBC but like our series. I do want to run moe than 4 races a year. I've run other local stuff. The combo will make the power but cost and pushing the hp to these levels could start causing problems.

Tough call! But like I said great points!!
Old 12-06-2013, 01:53 PM
  #47  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Andy, give me a call. You know what I was able to do for Manna. Let's talk.
Old 12-06-2013, 02:31 PM
  #48  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
93camaro_zzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

A stock bottom end 5.3 with a ON3 turbo will make around 3000hp.


....According to the intranets.
Old 12-06-2013, 02:53 PM
  #49  
I need a gauge for that
iTrader: (37)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 10,921
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

This will probably be laughed at, but why not get really creative and go with 4 76mm turbos? Two per bank. Probably want a smaller AR on the hot side but that is an after thought on something like this. Based on the ls firing order, I would cylinders 1 and 5, 3 and 7, 2 and 4, and 6 and 8.
Old 12-06-2013, 03:17 PM
  #50  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
This will probably be laughed at, but why not get really creative and go with 4 76mm turbos? Two per bank. Probably want a smaller AR on the hot side but that is an after thought on something like this. Based on the ls firing order, I would cylinders 1 and 5, 3 and 7, 2 and 4, and 6 and 8.
With that the biggest issue is space. Some people can barely cram 2 turbos under their hood let alone 4 of them.
Old 12-06-2013, 03:23 PM
  #51  
I need a gauge for that
iTrader: (37)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 10,921
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Put two in the rear and size the housing accordingly...
Old 12-06-2013, 03:32 PM
  #52  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
Put two in the rear and size the housing accordingly...
Then you have weight issues with all the extra piping and oil feeds
Old 12-06-2013, 04:30 PM
  #53  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (26)
 
ssvert99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,490
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Class is limited to twins... and we need to be realistic anyway. This needs to be cost efficient and efficient to build and maintain.
Old 12-06-2013, 05:20 PM
  #54  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
JAX04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indy
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 93camaro_zzz
A stock bottom end 5.3 with a ON3 turbo will make around 3000hp.


....According to the intranets.
This is Sig worthy!
Old 12-06-2013, 05:55 PM
  #55  
TECH Apprentice
 
rkreigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

call me crazy but I love the quad turbo idea

run 4 little ones and packaging could be worked out and they
would spool in a hurry

it would be a fun project and warrant a few bragging rights

while were at it, let's do dual and flex fuel and pump some E85

needs to be done
Old 12-06-2013, 09:02 PM
  #56  
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JAX04
This is Sig worthy!
Yea it is!! LOL
Old 12-06-2013, 10:46 PM
  #57  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,046
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

NO QUAD TURBO!!! lmao
Old 12-07-2013, 12:15 AM
  #58  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

this has gotten way off track...........lol

Quad on3's for life bitches!
Old 12-07-2013, 08:43 AM
  #59  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Not sure how to make 3000hp, but a few ideas:
Lots of boost.
Strong stuff inside the engine.

If you make 3000hp it will fly for sure, good luck guys!


Kurt
Old 12-07-2013, 09:58 AM
  #60  
TECH Enthusiast
 
StrokerTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Seem's silly to spend that much money on something to run a 4 race series that pays hardly anything to win, and maybe race some local stuff..
IMHO I would build a twin turbo 481X or BBC and run REAL Outlaw Drag Radial... Where there is 2-3 races a month for 5k or more, at true radial prepped tracks.. I know our new Outlaw 10.5 car will only race NMCA locally because of payout structure.. 4 days at the track, $2,500 to win..
I would rather drive to Cecil County for a one day $5,000 to win race against some of the best Outlaw 10.5 guys in the country!

Just my thoughts Andy. Steve @ LRE


Quick Reply: Shooting for 3000 hp. Ideas and input



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.