Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

So many different cams these days.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2013, 01:15 AM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default So many different cams these days.

Ive been calling around to get a new cam spec for my car and have been getting a lot of different ideas from all the big cam sponsors. Im confused.

I won't list names unless its off the shelf.
These are cams Im considering for my 9.5:1 forged 370 with a t4 comp 88mm turbo.

Tu2 by speed inc 236/236 578/.578 112.5lsa.
This cam seems to go against everyone elses and everything ive read about good turbo cams. But has great reviews and from a great shop, just dont get the 112.5 lsa and low lift.

I was spec'd a 225/231 .610/.612 on 115lsa.

Then one said since its a t4 on a 370 a 232/227 .600/.600 115.

My current cam was spec'd from a big shop, its a 232/236 .595/.602 115+4lsa on xer lobes.

My issue is the xer lobes which I hear are tough on springs and unstable. Im trying to make power past 6k and that's not happening with the current cam. Could be some thing else but for the low cost of a cam id like to have the correct one in there.
Old 12-26-2013, 01:18 AM
  #2  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

3600 vig 3disc,325 gears, ported 241 heads, ls6 intake/tb. 3840lbs Trans am with a tbrake, street driven but going for low 9s.

Best time so far is 9.8@138 at 20psi.
Old 12-26-2013, 04:15 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (43)
 
98Camarod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Can you give more info on the turbo setup? What's your converter slip %? How much boost are you leaving on? what's your 60'?
Old 12-26-2013, 06:08 AM
  #4  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
ablakez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I made 975rwhp with my last setup with a TU2 cam
418+S88 18psi

My current build is going to be using their TU1.5 cam
6.0+S480 looking for 700ish for now.
Old 12-26-2013, 06:21 AM
  #5  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
yenkomike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: oxford mi
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 181 Likes on 96 Posts

Default

if it wont pull over 6k I don't think the cam is the issue .sounds like a backpressure or valve spring problem. if it has high backpressure it will pickup power with less cam. some guys are getting up to 65-6600 rpm with an isky triple 12 cam and it is much less duration than all of those cams listed. what is the turbine wheel size and housing a/r. ?
Old 12-26-2013, 07:25 AM
  #6  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Cam number two is the closest for a t4 but needs a little less on the exhaust side. It is easy to over cam the T4 housings. The speed inc one would be great with a free flowing housing though.
Old 12-26-2013, 07:59 AM
  #7  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SPRAYED 01

My issue is the xer lobes which I hear are tough on springs and unstable. Im trying to make power past 6k and that's not happening with the current cam. Could be some thing else but for the low cost of a cam id like to have the correct one in there.
Have you measured the exhaust back pressure on your current setup? What AR t4? Exh wheel size?

Last edited by Forcefed86; 12-26-2013 at 09:32 AM.
Old 12-26-2013, 09:01 AM
  #8  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I made 735whp and 920wtq on a mustang dyno with a tu1 cam. Ran out of injector though so only pushed 15psi
Old 12-26-2013, 10:06 AM
  #9  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not sure on verter slip, I did measure back pressure it was 35psi at 20psi boost.

Its a 1.10 ar 88mm billet comp wheel with a 94/88 turbine 4 inch open dp.

Leaving on 3psi with the tbrake gets me a mid 1.4 60ft. I haven't tried more off the line but I think it could go 5psi with no wheel spin.
Old 12-26-2013, 10:08 AM
  #10  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

There are a ton of cams out there and a lot will work close to what you need.
Old 12-26-2013, 10:14 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sbcgenII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort hood
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Jim Moran @ speed inc had a 3900# Lt1 camaro fully loaded street car trapping 145+ over 10 years ago. He might know a thing or 2 about what works.

Your current cam is a 115+4 and the speed inc is on a 112.5. I bet the 2 intake centerlines are really close. The IVO and IVC are probably pretty close too.
Old 12-26-2013, 11:33 AM
  #12  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SPRAYED 01
Not sure on verter slip, I did measure back pressure it was 35psi at 20psi boost.

Its a 1.10 ar 88mm billet comp wheel with a 94/88 turbine 4 inch open dp.

Leaving on 3psi with the tbrake gets me a mid 1.4 60ft. I haven't tried more off the line but I think it could go 5psi with no wheel spin.
I think that housing is more of an issue than the cam. You have plenty of wheel but it sounds more like it's choking in that 1.10 housing to me. I'd try a larger AR housing before changing out the current cam.
Old 12-26-2013, 03:54 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,687
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

The triple 12 seems to pull pretty well up top.

[/URL]

Last edited by smokeshow; 12-26-2013 at 10:24 PM.
Old 12-26-2013, 05:51 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
yenkomike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: oxford mi
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 181 Likes on 96 Posts

Default

if that dyno graph is with a triple 12 cam there is no reason to run a bigger cam in most of these street engines unless they want to loose down low and add spool time.

I see a lot of cars running these 230+duration cams. to me those are max effort open dump tube , big turbine wheel cams. they work good but ad a smaller turbine and a tight convertor and it wont work to well.they spool slow and don't recover after a shift as well. better to under cam than over cam . jmho.
Old 12-26-2013, 07:27 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (43)
 
98Camarod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SPRAYED 01
Not sure on verter slip, I did measure back pressure it was 35psi at 20psi boost.

Its a 1.10 ar 88mm billet comp wheel with a 94/88 turbine 4 inch open dp.

Leaving on 3psi with the tbrake gets me a mid 1.4 60ft. I haven't tried more off the line but I think it could go 5psi with no wheel spin.
What size tire do you have and what rpm do you cross through the traps?
Old 12-26-2013, 08:14 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

28inch tire, about 6200 through the traps.
Old 12-26-2013, 08:20 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (43)
 
98Camarod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SPRAYED 01
28inch tire, about 6200 through the traps.
13% converter slip. I'd give PTC a call.
Old 12-26-2013, 10:30 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,687
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by yenkomike
if that dyno graph is with a triple 12 cam there is no reason to run a bigger cam in most of these street engines unless they want to loose down low and add spool time.

I see a lot of cars running these 230+duration cams. to me those are max effort open dump tube , big turbine wheel cams. they work good but ad a smaller turbine and a tight convertor and it wont work to well.they spool slow and don't recover after a shift as well. better to under cam than over cam . jmho.
People just like that lumpy cam sound I guess. On the dyno I didn't go wide open with it until 3k to keep it from downshifting, and full boost by 4700 or so. Those little cams have a lot of low end. Helps the turbo get moving when it really needs it.
Old 12-27-2013, 06:10 AM
  #19  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
yenkomike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: oxford mi
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 181 Likes on 96 Posts

Default

that looks like about all the cam a stock lower end engine whould ever need if it is street driven. nice power curve.
Old 12-27-2013, 07:19 AM
  #20  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Remember its not just the power curve but the limitations of the fuel you are using has to be taken into account. Some times a "bigger" cam or one with less DCR is needed to keep the engine from detonating to death.


Quick Reply: So many different cams these days.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM.