Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

THE LIST-Top 10 STOCK BOTTOM END LSx(s)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2014, 09:07 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
coltboostin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Avon, Ohio
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KnightmareLS1
This makes me excited for when I swap a 5.3 in mine and crank my APS twins up!
Right? LOL. Are you on 20gs as well?
Old 01-01-2014, 10:16 PM
  #22  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Andrewfus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dementia
Positive. The blocks never been apart. The car's been mine since it rolled off of the showroom floor with 2miles on the clock. Closest thing to taking the block apart is removing the intake for the VicJr/elbow combo. Even at the stock boost settings on the kit (7.5 psi) I made a lot more power than I expected. Sprung at 7.5 psi (indicated 9 on my gauge) it made 606hp 639lbft. I know it goes against the FI Mantra but I havent been able to afford to do engine mods yet. Wanted to start w/ the twin setup and then build the engine around that instead of building an NA engine and then rebuilding it for FI later. Just didnt want to do things twice although I didnt know much about the pitfalls of the APS kits when i bought it so I'm stuck doing things twice it looks like anyways.

The cam is the stock LS1 cam (unless GM snuck in a Z06 cam maybe?). Turbo's are MHI TD06h-20g turbos. Quite a bit smaller than the 35r's but I'm sure the 20g's wouldnt have much left in them if they weren't smoking and willing to be pushed further. I credit the higher than expected numbers to my tuner Clint at American Intense Racing. He's done the work on my car w/ the turbo kit and most importantly the Tune which he's been doing for as long as I can remember and apparently is on top of his game. The car should be going back in to be switched over to speed density soon (probably in february so that I can get an emissions tune in at the same time vs taking it in twice). Did my best to get in as many passes the last few weeks by emissions vans so hopefully I wont have to worry about actually getting it tuned for that. Hoping the E85 has cleaned up the exhaust enough to pass the road sides. I'm hoping w/ the speed density tune I'll end up over 700hp at the wheels without turning up the boost any more than the 13lbs its at now. Irks me being just under the next 100hp mark. Let me know if you have any other questions about the setup.
with that kit u are able to use factory k member and still keep ac and all accessories? how much is this kit?
Old 01-01-2014, 10:25 PM
  #23  
Teching In
 
aacrios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

9.31@147 bone stock 2010 5.3 308 rear end Powerglide e85 15 psi @660 hp 1/8 was 6.0@118 1.47 60 ft 74mm t6 borgwamer turbo 2800 pound car. Upgraded the cam springs and turbo to 88mm waiting to go back to the track
Attached Thumbnails THE LIST-Top 10 STOCK BOTTOM END LSx(s)-image-269147871.jpg   THE LIST-Top 10 STOCK BOTTOM END LSx(s)-image-1256983031.jpg  
Old 01-02-2014, 06:15 AM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I think my rx7 still has the highest mph, 8.65 at 167.9mph with JY 5.3 with 76mm, didn't get very many track passes so the et was never great.

Old 01-02-2014, 09:59 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
coltboostin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Avon, Ohio
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by aacrios
9.31@147 bone stock 2010 5.3 308 rear end Powerglide e85 15 psi @660 hp 1/8 was 6.0@118 1.47 60 ft 74mm t6 borgwamer turbo 2800 pound car. Upgraded the cam springs and turbo to 88mm waiting to go back to the track
Nice! Should roll hard with the 88m
Old 01-02-2014, 10:02 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
coltboostin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Avon, Ohio
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by skinnies
I think my rx7 still has the highest mph, 8.65 at 167.9mph with JY 5.3 with 76mm, didn't get very many track passes so the et was never great.

[IMG][/IMG]
Sick.

I looked up some info on the car-you can correct anything I have in error.

Last edited by coltboostin; 01-02-2014 at 10:33 AM.
Old 01-02-2014, 10:34 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,482
Received 73 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

I was gonna try and find out what the stock bottom LS1 record is. Everyone kinda lumps 4.8s, 5.3s, 5.7s and 6.0s together but im lil curious about the actual ls1 (5.7) record.

Mine has been over 600 for 2 years with the last year over 700. I ran it this year between 13-15lbs depending on the night. It made 690 on 12lbs so i know its over 700 regardless. Im going for 800+ this year and ill finally get it to a track.

Turbo is a Precision 7675 .96a/r cast wheel. Stock bottom LS1 with a custom (n/a) cam. Its got 317s for heads with ARP studs and ls9 gaskets. Stock rod bolts. Stock t56 with a Moser 9in. Car weighs 3615 with me and a half tank.

And imo "stock bottom" car can have whatever heads they want. All that matters to me is really the crank/rods/pistions because those are what normally fail.

Vacuum pump shut off, thats why the a/f looks weird.
Name:  760hpdyno_zpsab77591f.jpg
Views: 30561
Size:  83.2 KB
Old 01-02-2014, 10:51 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
coltboostin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Avon, Ohio
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryans99ls1
I was gonna try and find out what the stock bottom LS1 record is. Everyone kinda lumps 4.8s, 5.3s, 5.7s and 6.0s together but im lil curious about the actual ls1 (5.7) record.

Mine has been over 600 for 2 years with the last year over 700. I ran it this year between 13-15lbs depending on the night. It made 690 on 12lbs so i know its over 700 regardless. Im going for 800+ this year and ill finally get it to a track.

Turbo is a Precision 7675 .96a/r cast wheel. Stock bottom LS1 with a custom (n/a) cam. Its got 317s for heads with ARP studs and ls9 gaskets. Stock rod bolts. Stock t56 with a Moser 9in. Car weighs 3615 with me and a half tank.

And imo "stock bottom" car can have whatever heads they want. All that matters to me is really the crank/rods/pistions because those are what normally fail.
I agree-thats why I started this list!! There was no real organization for all of the info out there. One interesting thing that has already come up-although most shops say you have to upgrade your rod hardware for big power /RPM-I dont think any of the top 3 in either list have upgraded rod bolts!

dementia has the mark for stock LS1s @ 804whp. (see list). I'll add you too it.
Old 01-02-2014, 11:05 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
coltboostin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Avon, Ohio
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Where are the 4.8 guys at? I thought there was quite a few going fast...
Old 01-02-2014, 11:29 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,482
Received 73 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by coltboostin
I agree-thats why I started this list!! There was no real organization for all of the info out there. One interesting thing that has already come up-although most shops say you have to upgrade your rod hardware for big power /RPM-I dont think any of the top 3 in either list have upgraded rod bolts!

dementia has the mark for stock LS1s @ 804whp. (see list). I'll add you too it.
Ive always been against the whole rod bolt thing but thats another conversation.

I think Unleashed Performance had their stock bottom c5 vette over 800hp but ill have to look for that thread.
Old 01-02-2014, 04:50 PM
  #31  
Staging Lane
 
5.3parts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coltboostin
Any more details? Turbo? Weight? Ever dyno?
BW588@20psi
stock l92's
stock ly6
232/240 115lsa cam
th400
3100

from his post
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...-59-156-a.html
Old 01-02-2014, 06:22 PM
  #32  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

My car has actually never been on a dyno the 900 SAE hp was from my 4x4 truck with a cast Garrett GT76 at 20 psi.
Old 01-02-2014, 06:38 PM
  #33  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Heavy H.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land Of Enchantment
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryans99ls1
I was gonna try and find out what the stock bottom LS1 record is. Everyone kinda lumps 4.8s, 5.3s, 5.7s and 6.0s together but im lil curious about the actual ls1 (5.7) record.

Mine has been over 600 for 2 years with the last year over 700. I ran it this year between 13-15lbs depending on the night. It made 690 on 12lbs so i know its over 700 regardless. Im going for 800+ this year and ill finally get it to a track.

Turbo is a Precision 7675 .96a/r cast wheel. Stock bottom LS1 with a custom (n/a) cam. Its got 317s for heads with ARP studs and ls9 gaskets. Stock rod bolts. Stock t56 with a Moser 9in. Car weighs 3615 with me and a half tank.

And imo "stock bottom" car can have whatever heads they want. All that matters to me is really the crank/rods/pistions because those are what normally fail.

Vacuum pump shut off, thats why the a/f looks weird.
Im trying to find the specs on your turbo on Precision's website and I can't. Is that a 75mm turbo?
Old 01-02-2014, 08:42 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,482
Received 73 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Heavy H.P.
Im trying to find the specs on your turbo on Precision's website and I can't. Is that a 75mm turbo?
It's their standard 76mm turbo. 76mmm compressor 75mm turbine. Has the ported H housing so I guess it's technically their 76mm GTS-H
http://www.precisionturbo.net/Street-and-Race/ss/1-000-1-200HP/details/Street-and-Race-Turbocharger---PT7675/277
Old 01-02-2014, 09:04 PM
  #35  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
dementia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Andrewfus
with that kit u are able to use factory k member and still keep ac and all accessories? how much is this kit?
No you need the BMR k member built specifically for this kit. I've heard UMI turbo k members work as well but i cant vouch for it since i dont have that particular one. All accessories and AC still intact w/ this kit. Price for a new kit last I saw was still rediculous (in my eyes). It was about 8k from some of the vendors I had seen. The kit isnt being made anymore so I'm not sure if they're still being sold or what they're going for if vendors are still selling off their stock. I bought mine used/new. Someone had the kit sitting for years unused because they wrecked or sold their Camaro. I got mine for less than 4k, close to 3 iirc. If you're interested in the kit i'd say keep an eye open for a used kit at a good price and then buy one of the 3rd party turbo upgrades for them and you'll probably still come in under the new price. I'm piecing together a huron twin setup so mine will be up for grabs eventually but I dont have any inkling on an eta.

Last edited by dementia; 01-02-2014 at 09:34 PM.
Old 01-02-2014, 09:12 PM
  #36  
TECH Apprentice
 
silver_82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ft. Wayne
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You can throw mine in there too.
LM7 5.3, twin 66s, glide, 3250lbs
5.49@128
8.55@159.5
Old 01-02-2014, 09:19 PM
  #37  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by silver_82
You can throw mine in there too.
LM7 5.3, twin 66s, glide, 3250lbs
5.49@128
8.55@159.5
Were the 2005+ 5.3's still LM7's?

I believe the 2005 and up are considered Gen 4 motors. Iron blocks are (LY5 and LMG) and two aluminum block versions (LH6 and LC9)?

Wikipedia says so anyway.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_LS_engine
Old 01-02-2014, 09:41 PM
  #38  
TECH Apprentice
 
silver_82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ft. Wayne
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Vortec_engine

Looks like its a gen III lm7

Last edited by silver_82; 01-02-2014 at 09:52 PM.
Old 01-03-2014, 06:40 AM
  #39  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by silver_82
But it was a 2005? Thought it had the floating pistons and bigger rods in it? I think there is a grey area between 2005 and 2007. same wiki page claims gen 3 can be from 1997-2007. So who knows... I thought the LM7's all had the old gen3 rods/pistons in them. Guess thats not the case...


3.78 in bore blocks (2005–present)
This family of blocks is just an updated version of its Generation III predecessor with Generation IV updates and capabilities. Applications of this family were mainly for trucks but did see some mild usage (with some modifications) in front-wheel-drive cars.
4.8 L[edit]
The Vortec 4800 LY2 is a Generation IV small block V8 truck engine. Like its LR4 predecessor, it gets its displacement from a 96.01 mm bore and 83 mm stroke. The smallest member of the Generation IV engine family, it is unique in that it is the only member of that family that is used in trucks that does not feature either variable valve timing (until 2010)
5.3 L[edit]
Vortec 5300
The Generation IV Vortec 5300 engines are truck engines that share all the improvements and refinements found in other Generation IV engines. At present, four versions of the 5300 are in production: two iron block versions (LY5 and LMG) and two aluminum block versions (LH6 and LC9). All versions feature the Active Fuel Management system, and starting with MY 2010, variable valve timing (engine RPO codes stayed the same).

Last edited by Forcefed86; 01-03-2014 at 06:46 AM.
Old 01-03-2014, 08:07 AM
  #40  
TECH Enthusiast
 
HexenLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

There is a difference between gen III and Gen IV blocks. The gen 3 blocks got gen 4 internals before the gen 4 engines were fully phased in.


Quick Reply: THE LIST-Top 10 STOCK BOTTOM END LSx(s)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.