Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Which would be faster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2014, 06:49 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (199)
 
11SECSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hampton Va
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Which would be faster

If you had three cars ^^^ 1 TURBO/ 1 SUPERCHARGED/ 1 NITROUS that each made the same Horsepower which of the three would be faster .
Old 01-07-2014, 07:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (29)
 
madmike9396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,375
Received 202 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

depends on transmission rearend etc etc

why is there no NA car in there ?
Old 01-07-2014, 07:21 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

If everything was EXACTLY the same my guess would be the nitrous car. Instant huge tq & hp, and no parasitic losses
Old 01-07-2014, 07:26 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,482
Received 74 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
If everything was EXACTLY the same my guess would be the nitrous car. Instant huge tq & hp, and no parasitic losses
Parasitic losses dont matter if they are making the same power.. But id say nitrous or turbo. Nitrous you can hit it really hard off the line but you can do the same with a trans brake/turbo, its such a setup specific question. Im still leaning towards nitrous though
Old 01-07-2014, 07:30 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
HexenLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Is this a troll thread to start 100 arguments?

Btw, there are far too many factors.

Is it a 500 shot of nitrous that hits at 2500 RPM or a 200 shot that hits at 4000 RPM?
Is it a small turbo thats cracking open the wastegate at 2000 RPM?
Is it a roots blower, twin screw, or centrifugal?
Old 01-07-2014, 07:44 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (199)
 
11SECSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hampton Va
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Just wondering since someone I know said that a nitrous car wuld be faster then any other with all being equal .But from comments so far it depends on setup .I'm just getting into the FI world .
Old 01-07-2014, 07:53 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (29)
 
madmike9396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,375
Received 202 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

ima say supercharged. instant hp and tq don't have to worry about a hiccup in nitrous or spool time with turbo
Old 01-07-2014, 08:22 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
yonerhottlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pretty vague question with too many varying factors as previously stated but with that said I'd have to put my money on nitrous.
Old 01-07-2014, 08:35 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Back when I had my 04 Mustang Gt I made 400 rwhp & 500 rwtq. It was a 5-speed with a 3.90 gear. Raced my buddy's 04 gt as well (5-speed and 3.73's) that made 450 rwhp with a Kenne Bell. Pretty similar cars all around, and it was basically a dead nuts race from a roll
Old 01-07-2014, 08:57 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
HexenLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madmike9396
ima say supercharged. instant hp and tq don't have to worry about a hiccup in nitrous or spool time with turbo
Turbos hit their peak boost much earlier than a centrifugal setup will. Centrifugal builds boost in a linear manner in relation to RPM. A properly sized turbo can hit its peak boost right in the middle of the rev range and hold it until redline/shift point. The centrifugal has its upsides when compared to turbos, but if you're limiting its peak power to the exact same as a turbo/nitrous setup, it'll probably produce less power everywhere below the peak, even if the blower itself is capable of more power than either the turbo or nitrous setup.
Old 01-07-2014, 11:21 PM
  #11  
8 Second Club
 
LILHEMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in my neighborhood
Posts: 1,009
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

the one with the most money in it.
Old 01-08-2014, 03:00 AM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (29)
 
madmike9396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,375
Received 202 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HexenLord
Turbos hit their peak boost much earlier than a centrifugal setup will. Centrifugal builds boost in a linear manner in relation to RPM. A properly sized turbo can hit its peak boost right in the middle of the rev range and hold it until redline/shift point. The centrifugal has its upsides when compared to turbos, but if you're limiting its peak power to the exact same as a turbo/nitrous setup, it'll probably produce less power everywhere below the peak, even if the blower itself is capable of more power than either the turbo or nitrous setup.
good to know



Quick Reply: Which would be faster



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.