Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Timing and fuel at the starting line?

Old 07-10-2014, 12:40 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Shoaf85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Even in an automatic without a trans brake a 2 step will help spool the turbo because it will allow you to got WOT without pushing thru your brakes on the line. When you are footbraking it up until your max rpm before pushing begins your T/B obviously isn't at 100% tps. So you would set the 2 step to allow a WOT launch from just below whatever RPM the car starts to push through the brakes. The engine load from the 2 step and being at WOT will spool the turbo much faster than footbraking it at say 70% throttle.

In short if your car starts to push at 3200 rpms then set the 2 step to 3000 hold it WOT and let off the brakes and 2 step simultaneously on green.

I have done this on my current car with good luck and I'm even launching at an RPM well below where my turbo really starts to spool. But it really makes a big difference by being WOT when releasing the brake vs applying only enough throttle to not roll out of the beam
Old 07-10-2014, 12:56 PM
  #22  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

My converter is a 9" ATI. Spec'd for my 496 on a small shot.
EMS is the factory PCM. I'm the tuner.
The converter is actually quite tight. There isn't much torque in the 5.3 out of boost compared to the rat.
My 3600 Yank in my vette is much looser by comparison.

It's not getting a converter. Unless I get a job. So I have to work with what I have for now.
Old 07-10-2014, 01:05 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
rockoosi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Clinton MD
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Shoaf85
Even in an automatic without a trans brake a 2 step will help spool the turbo because it will allow you to got WOT without pushing thru your brakes on the line. When you are footbraking it up until your max rpm before pushing begins your T/B obviously isn't at 100% tps. So you would set the 2 step to allow a WOT launch from just below whatever RPM the car starts to push through the brakes. The engine load from the 2 step and being at WOT will spool the turbo much faster than footbraking it at say 70% throttle.

In short if your car starts to push at 3200 rpms then set the 2 step to 3000 hold it WOT and let off the brakes and 2 step simultaneously on green.

I have done this on my current car with good luck and I'm even launching at an RPM well below where my turbo really starts to spool. But it really makes a big difference by being WOT when releasing the brake vs applying only enough throttle to not roll out of the beam
I just got my 2 step and will be trying this when I go back to the track. But I still would like to know what seems to net the best results with regards to timing and fuel while on the 2 step?
Old 07-10-2014, 05:07 PM
  #24  
9 Second Club
 
shawnc16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Add more timing. I'm at 35 degrees and I believe 13.5 AFR but I just leaned it out some more. I was only building 3 psi on the footbrake with a 1.32 AR 96mm on a 6.0. I hooked up my 2 step and it helped bump boost up even more but for whatever reason the damn thing quit working on me or else I'd have a better answer for you.

Whats your 60'?
Old 07-11-2014, 09:48 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
rockoosi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Clinton MD
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by shawnc16
Add more timing. I'm at 35 degrees and I believe 13.5 AFR but I just leaned it out some more. I was only building 3 psi on the footbrake with a 1.32 AR 96mm on a 6.0. I hooked up my 2 step and it helped bump boost up even more but for whatever reason the damn thing quit working on me or else I'd have a better answer for you.

Whats your 60'?
So far the best 60' I've ever gotten with this car is 1.6s on the footbrake. I would LOVE to see some 1.4s without having to monkey around with my converter again. I can hold the car on the footbrake right around 3k but I'm still not building boost. I assume it's because the throttle blade isn't opened enough. Anything more than about 3000-3200 the car begins to push. So if I can figure out the best way to set my tune up while on the 2 step that would be great!!
Old 07-11-2014, 10:00 AM
  #26  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rockoosi1
So far the best 60' I've ever gotten with this car is 1.6s on the footbrake. I would LOVE to see some 1.4s without having to monkey around with my converter again. I can hold the car on the footbrake right around 3k but I'm still not building boost. I assume it's because the throttle blade isn't opened enough. Anything more than about 3000-3200 the car begins to push. So if I can figure out the best way to set my tune up while on the 2 step that would be great!!
Beef up your brakes. Hard aftermarket brake pads do a poor job of holding a wheel static, esp with little to no heat in them. Get some soft cheap pads on the rear, extend your brake pedal and plumb an electric vacuum pump on your brake booster(used a heavy duty 12v tire pump plumbed backwards.) Put some serious foot pressure on that pedal and it should hold a decent amount power this way without a T-brake. (drum brakes work even better than discs)

I’ve yet to see an LS setup car use this method and it plain works. Was able to launch at 30+lbs with this method on a import build.
Attached Thumbnails Timing and fuel at the starting line?-pedal-extension-1-dsm.jpg  

Last edited by Forcefed86; 07-11-2014 at 03:04 PM.
Old 07-11-2014, 10:24 AM
  #27  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
rockoosi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Clinton MD
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Beef up your brakes. Hard aftermarket brake pads do a poor job of holding a wheel static, esp with little to no heat in them. Get some soft cheap pads on the rear, extend your brake pedal and plumb an electric vacuum pump on your brake booster. Put some serious foot pressure on that pedal as well. Should hold some serious power this way without a T-brake. (drum brakes work even better than discs)

I’ve yet to see an LS setup car use this method and it plain works. Was able to launch at 30+lbs with this method on a import build.
Now that's what I call thinking outside the box!!!
Old 07-11-2014, 01:50 PM
  #28  
9 Second Club
 
shawnc16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't get much better but the track surface was awful
Old 07-11-2014, 02:31 PM
  #29  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rockoosi1
Now that's what I call thinking outside the box!!!
Turbo Buick guys went even further by putting two long shoes on each side, changing to a bigger wheel cylinder and reinforcing the backing plates.
As well as biasing the braking to the rear wheels.
Have to be careful though, because it sort of takes the front brakes out of the equation when stopping after a pass.

I put soft semi metallic rear shoes on, biased my brakes to the rear. It is interesting slowing after a run.....
I also give the drums and shoes a scuff and adj the shoes throughout the season.
Old 07-11-2014, 02:38 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Not to steal from Ron...

But, is simply installing a rev limit/2 step a sure-fire way to build boost? Be easier to do that than redo the brake system.

The Holley efi I'm running has 3 rev limiters so I already have something to work with.
Old 07-11-2014, 02:57 PM
  #31  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Seems like if you already have that, then you should be able to make the ones in the Holly system work.
Old 07-11-2014, 05:06 PM
  #32  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Steal away! We are learning stuff!

Ron
Old 07-11-2014, 05:55 PM
  #33  
9 Second Club
 
shawnc16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have Holley as well, the 2 step does help. I need to get some time off work to play with it more.
Old 07-11-2014, 06:52 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by shawnc16
I have Holley as well, the 2 step does help. I need to get some time off work to play with it more.
The Holley allows fuel, spark, fuel/spark cut-offs during the rev limits. Theres also a "soft" function? Anybody care to suggest which setting would give best results? Of course I'll try all but looking for the Cliffs Notes here.
Old 07-11-2014, 07:19 PM
  #35  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
jordoza777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: las cruces nm
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

so with an auto and no trans brake if i put a two step in and tune it just below my foot brake push through rpm but retard the timing like i would on a manual it will build boost and allow full throttle launch. i have a 6l80 so no trans brake available and have tried foot braking but i always push through the brakes far before i start building boost so my best 60 foot has been a 1.80 with my 2012 camaro. im just suprised because everyone i know told me unless i had a trans brake a two step was a waste of time. if this works i might actually quit being embarassed about my car quarter mile times.
Old 07-11-2014, 10:01 PM
  #36  
9 Second Club
 
shawnc16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Theres been discussion on other boards that with an auto trans you would add timing and lean it out on the 2 step. I'm not 100% sure as I havent had enough testing time myself but I was just putting it out there. Hopefully someone else can chime in.
Old 07-11-2014, 11:09 PM
  #37  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

See that has always confused me as that is the opposite of what you do to build boost with a 2 step on a manual car. We always pulled timing and dumped in fuel.
Old 07-12-2014, 01:48 AM
  #38  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Sarg,
Perhaps it has to with the fact that a manual puts no load on the engine? Trying to wrap my head around it as well.

I'll mess with mine after the current heat wave subsides. F'n around with the car in triple digit heat is just not my idea if fun.
Car doesn't like it either I'm sure.

Last edited by RonSSNova; 07-12-2014 at 02:05 AM.
Old 07-12-2014, 06:04 AM
  #39  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (43)
 
98Camarod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sarg
See that has always confused me as that is the opposite of what you do to build boost with a 2 step on a manual car. We always pulled timing and dumped in fuel.
You can do that with an auto as well, it's known as "anti-lag". I didn't want to do that since I've read that it is much harder on parts
Old 07-12-2014, 07:37 AM
  #40  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Well, that is not a true anti-lag, haha. That usually involves air injection and such and you are right is pretty nasty on the turbine if held for too long. I got to play around with it on a Subaru I tuned. Kind of scary the first time you do it! But I think just pulling a little timing and fattening it up could work too provided you are able to lean it out fast enough when the button is released. On the Subaru I tuned it was just one or two cells on the ignition map and the VE map that were not really hit in normal driving so it worked out pretty well.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Timing and fuel at the starting line?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.