Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

230/236 114+4 cam questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2014, 10:43 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
360demonRT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 230/236 114+4 cam questions

The cam is from Tooley, it's his btr stage 3 turbo.

They recommended the cam for a 32x" rod/piston twin s366 motor. It's in a stock 5.3 while I build the motor and turbo setup. My problem is I'm feeling cheap lately. Any issues using this cam in a small inch rod/piston motor, Holley Hiram, th400/ptc 3500 with a single Borg turbo instead of the twins? Looking for enough power to push 3500 lbs sub 8.50.
Old 09-02-2014, 10:49 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
LosLS2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You'll need more converter to help spool the bigger single. Cam will work. Not sure an S480 will get there at that weight.
Old 09-03-2014, 02:00 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
360demonRT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Would a person be better off saving pennies for a few more months, in your opinion, and stick with the original plan? I have a tig so the only extra cost will be the extra turbo, oil feed/return and an extra waste gate. So around 1k more. Honestly by the time I pony up for something bigger or billet to get where I want to be, the price looks like it might be comparable.... Am I right, or close? That and figure a restall as well. Need this to stall on the footbrake, no trans brake. Looks like I might just stick with the original plan lol
Old 09-06-2014, 05:42 PM
  #4  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Cam seems large for a 320 c.i. motor.

I used to like to cam engines to make as much power on as little boost as possible. Large cams accomplish this because they raise VE% of the engine N/A which in turn moves more airflow. This makes more power on less boost pressure, but the amount of airflow being moved is the same as a smaller cam and higher boost pressure.

On low boost this is not an issue as the compressor map is wide enough to keep the turbo in an efficiency island that is still optimal. At higher boost though where the compressor map gets narrower, a cam this large being used in your combo with that turbo will put the compressor wheel well outside of its efficiency islands and back pressure rises as a result.

Keeping the cam smaller and boost pressure higher lowers the boost pressure to back pressure ratio. Since the smaller cam will move less airflow on the same amount of boost as the large cam, more boost pressure is needed to move the same amount of airflow. This helps keep compressor efficiency higher which means lower IAT's, lower back pressure and more power across the RPM range.

Lower back pressure will allow power to peak higher and will allow the engine to pull further into the RPM range. Smaller cams will also move more airflow at lower engine speeds which builds boost faster if the turbo is capable of doing so.

Yes you will have to run more boost with a smaller cam than you would with a larger cam, but it does not mean that the engine will blow up sooner, or lift the heads sooner. Boost is just a number and is not a direct indication of cylinder pressure.
Old 09-06-2014, 06:37 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (45)
 
JustAFooL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
Cam seems large for a 320 c.i. motor.

I used to like to cam engines to make as much power on as little boost as possible. Large cams accomplish this because they raise VE% of the engine N/A which in turn moves more airflow. This makes more power on less boost pressure, but the amount of airflow being moved is the same as a smaller cam and higher boost pressure.

On low boost this is not an issue as the compressor map is wide enough to keep the turbo in an efficiency island that is still optimal. At higher boost though where the compressor map gets narrower, a cam this large being used in your combo with that turbo will put the compressor wheel well outside of its efficiency islands and back pressure rises as a result.

Keeping the cam smaller and boost pressure higher lowers the boost pressure to back pressure ratio. Since the smaller cam will move less airflow on the same amount of boost as the large cam, more boost pressure is needed to move the same amount of airflow. This helps keep compressor efficiency higher which means lower IAT's, lower back pressure and more power across the RPM range.

Lower back pressure will allow power to peak higher and will allow the engine to pull further into the RPM range. Smaller cams will also move more airflow at lower engine speeds which builds boost faster if the turbo is capable of doing so.

Yes you will have to run more boost with a smaller cam than you would with a larger cam, but it does not mean that the engine will blow up sooner, or lift the heads sooner. Boost is just a number and is not a direct indication of cylinder pressure.
This is why Martin got my business. An explanation even I could understand.
Old 09-08-2014, 06:51 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
360demonRT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Makes since. We'll see how it does tho, BTR has been in the game for a while and was recommended to me by a well respected local tuner. Just gonna pinch pennies an go ahead with the twins... The wife has my Christmas list lol



Quick Reply: 230/236 114+4 cam questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.