Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Flamed a TFS 6 bolt head on 28lbs of boost (Pics inside)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2014, 10:45 PM
  #21  
On The Tree
 
bluchev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lean and too much timing.
Old 09-10-2014, 11:34 PM
  #22  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (91)
 
MUSTANGBRKR02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
The problem cylinder looks leaner than the surrounding cylinder. May check that out. Mark the injector that came out of that hole and flow it. Or swap it out with the richest looking cylinder on that side at minimum.



I may have done the same at 25lbs and 17* a few weeks ago. I figured it was poor head clamping on my setup. Kinda looked like it had been eating its way to freedom over many runs, so it may not be related. I was using E85 and water/meth inj. No signs of detonation on the plugs, pistons, or CC. LS9 gaskets, china studs torqued to 75lbs once... never retorqued.

]
This was my first thought aswell.
Old 09-11-2014, 07:58 AM
  #23  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Out of curiosity what are the specs on the lil’john cam?

What kind of studs and HG did you use? Did you torque cycle the studs before final torque? Re-torque after a heat cycle? Final torque numbers?
Old 09-11-2014, 07:58 AM
  #24  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

The cylinder is clean from water. That big of hole from water jacket to cylinder he was pulling water in on the intake stroke guaranteed. That is why I suggested checking piston height compared to the rest

Send me Ur scanner and file to zacbrown1307@gmail.com

From the video it blew out down track but that isn't to say it got unseated early and started moving gas and couldn't recover
Old 09-11-2014, 10:15 AM
  #25  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
asubennett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My guess is you will see some funky things with the injector when you flow them. I had all sorts of issues with FIC (Clinic not Connection) and E85 on my 1000WHP EVO. Every few months it seemed they would be out of balance.

Super heavy car too let's not forget. The load on this motor is pretty intense between vehicle weight ant the 4L80E trans. I would move it to a better more consistent fuel for track days and run E85 dialed down on the street.
Old 09-11-2014, 10:51 AM
  #26  
On The Tree
 
turboventura's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Aren't the FIC2000 based of a natural gas injector and have issues with e85? I read a post a couple months ago but I can't remember if it was an ID injector or FIC
Old 09-11-2014, 12:04 PM
  #27  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (49)
 
transam69230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Out of curiosity what are the specs on the lil’john cam?

What kind of studs and HG did you use? Did you torque cycle the studs before final torque? Re-torque after a heat cycle? Final torque numbers?
Liljon cam specs are 247/251 .632 .632 117lsa +6

ARP 6 bolt head studs made for Dart Ls Motor , Cometic MLX gaskets.

I did not assemble longblock. Jakson assembled the longblock. No re-torque after heat cycle.

Last edited by transam69230; 09-11-2014 at 12:17 PM.
Old 09-11-2014, 12:50 PM
  #28  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Id think with that much duration in the cam, 17* doesn't sound excessive... even at 28lbs. Maybe the timing is ramped in too quickly? Screen shot of timing map? What are you reving to? Can you guess where it let go RPM wise in the logs?

Did you mark the balancer at TDC and verify the timing is 100% accurate? All 3 of my motors needed to be adjusted and re-synced.
Old 09-11-2014, 01:14 PM
  #29  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

If the E85 percentage was off, it would have shown in the AF ratio.

Also seems like if there were any sort of low spot there, a scratch, head surface wasn't perfectly smooth, it could have been working on that area for awhile.

Did it push any coolant prior at all?
Old 09-11-2014, 01:18 PM
  #30  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,046
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

E85 is finicky at the higher boost levels. I would want to see it in low 11 to 1 or even high 10.8 to 1 AFR. More like a alcohol
Old 09-11-2014, 02:01 PM
  #31  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
asubennett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zmg00camaross
E85 is finicky at the higher boost levels. I would want to see it in low 11 to 1 or even high 10.8 to 1 AFR. More like a alcohol
I keep hearing to run E85 super fat with more timing at higher power levels - I think that is crazy. Super fat on E85 in my view is more likely to have issues.

Get the timing right and run it in 11.4 to 11.8 range. Especially on an A/W IC set up. I think for folks who are non intercooled and relying on the corn to cool the IAT's a bit then perhaps a super fat tune up is worth it.

Super fat on E85 is going to break **** in my view. Lean on E85 is very forgiving provided IAT's are low.
Old 09-11-2014, 02:41 PM
  #32  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (49)
 
transam69230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova
If the E85 percentage was off, it would have shown in the AF ratio.

Also seems like if there were any sort of low spot there, a scratch, head surface wasn't perfectly smooth, it could have been working on that area for awhile.

Did it push any coolant prior at all?
Did not push any coolant prior to this pass that I aware of.
Old 09-11-2014, 02:42 PM
  #33  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,046
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by asubennett
I keep hearing to run E85 super fat with more timing at higher power levels - I think that is crazy. Super fat on E85 in my view is more likely to have issues.

Get the timing right and run it in 11.4 to 11.8 range. Especially on an A/W IC set up. I think for folks who are non intercooled and relying on the corn to cool the IAT's a bit then perhaps a super fat tune up is worth it.

Super fat on E85 is going to break **** in my view. Lean on E85 is very forgiving provided IAT's are low.
To a point. Once going higher boost and pushing big numbers I would switch to a race fuel or alcohol.
Old 09-11-2014, 02:42 PM
  #34  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (49)
 
transam69230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Plan on measuring back pressure, I think it may be high with the big motor and small turbine wheels I have.
Old 09-11-2014, 03:15 PM
  #35  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by asubennett
I keep hearing to run E85 super fat with more timing at higher power levels - I think that is crazy. Super fat on E85 in my view is more likely to have issues.

Get the timing right and run it in 11.4 to 11.8 range. Especially on an A/W IC set up. I think for folks who are non intercooled and relying on the corn to cool the IAT's a bit then perhaps a super fat tune up is worth it.

Super fat on E85 is going to break **** in my view. Lean on E85 is very forgiving provided IAT's are low.
I don't agree with that really. E85 has a huge tuning window. 10.44 to 12.64. (.71 to .86 lambda) Much better off on the rich side of the peak power window IMO. Also helps out if you have one or more lean cylinders.

With timing there is usually a clear do not exceed point. As soon as you stop making large power gains or stop seeing mph gains... stop. I think a lot of people tuning on a dyno tune to this point. Then when they go the track the extra load on the engine causes failures like the OP's. I'd pull 3-5* from the dyno visit if you tuned to the ragged edge timing wise. The weight of the car puts A LOT more load on the motor.

Last edited by Forcefed86; 09-11-2014 at 03:24 PM.
Old 09-11-2014, 03:47 PM
  #36  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
asubennett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
I don't agree with that really. E85 has a huge tuning window. 10.44 to 12.64. (.71 to .86 lambda) Much better off on the rich side of the peak power window IMO. Also helps out if you have one or more lean cylinders.

With timing there is usually a clear do not exceed point. As soon as you stop making large power gains or stop seeing mph gains... stop. I think a lot of people tuning on a dyno tune to this point. Then when they go the track the extra load on the engine causes failures like the OP's. I'd pull 3-5* from the dyno visit if you tuned to the ragged edge timing wise. The weight of the car puts A LOT more load on the motor.
E85 starts to rich knock below 11:2.1. Domestic guys turn their knock sensors off or so low on sensitivity they don't realize it. You will start lifting rings super rich at high, high hp. Plus power starts going down significantly as well richer than 11:4.1 gas scale in my experience. How do you compensate for that loss of power? More timing typically then you start breaking other ****.

Low timing, nice solid 11:4.1 E85 scale is ussually pretty safe. Now if you keep gaining power going from 11:4.1 to 11:2.1 to 11.0.1 etc... then so be it but that is out of the ordinary for sure.
Old 09-11-2014, 05:50 PM
  #37  
Changing Names
 
ScreamingL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by transam69230
Liljon cam specs are 247/251 .632 .632 117lsa +6

ARP 6 bolt head studs made for Dart Ls Motor , Cometic MLX gaskets.

I did not assemble longblock. Jakson assembled the longblock. No re-torque after heat cycle.
holy **** thats a big stick for a 427 especially with TFS245s and those turbines
Old 09-11-2014, 06:15 PM
  #38  
On The Tree
 
LosLS2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

11.5:1 on E85 on gas scale is perfectly fine. No need to go richer. Timing is also not excessive provided that there isn't a horrible backpressure ratio. Now, commanded AFR and actual AFR are 2 different things. Can you post a log showing actual AFR, timing, fuel pressure, voltage and MAP for this pass? What engine management?
Old 09-11-2014, 09:16 PM
  #39  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (49)
 
transam69230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Snip-it of the the log



All items captured during run


Last edited by transam69230; 09-11-2014 at 09:24 PM.
Old 09-11-2014, 09:17 PM
  #40  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (49)
 
transam69230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LosLS2
11.5:1 on E85 on gas scale is perfectly fine. No need to go richer. Timing is also not excessive provided that there isn't a horrible backpressure ratio. Now, commanded AFR and actual AFR are 2 different things. Can you post a log showing actual AFR, timing, fuel pressure, voltage and MAP for this pass? What engine management?

Stock PCM right now, what to get holley eventually but not in the budget currently for a little bit.


Quick Reply: Flamed a TFS 6 bolt head on 28lbs of boost (Pics inside)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.