Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

416 with twins?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2014, 01:03 PM
  #1  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Tim King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 416 with twins?

I recently broke a crank on my car that cost me the block so I just bought a new LS3 block and was considering doing a stroker while I was at it. I have twin 67mm turbo's and was wondering if anyone was running a similar setup and what stroker kit they went with. Previously had a 6.2 stock cube and was making a little over 900rwhp @ 17psi Trying to figure out what size exhaust housings I have right now but I'm thinking they are .61 or .70 what size housing would be good for the 416?
Old 12-11-2014, 02:36 PM
  #2  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

What turbine wheels ? T3 or T4 housings ?

What crank was it ?

If you were happy with spool before and have no need for more low rpm torque, then I wouldnt bother with the stroker.
Old 12-11-2014, 03:08 PM
  #3  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Tim King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It's a T4 housing and just found out the are .61, On the dyno at 5700rpm the power would fall off so I'm trying to prevent that and would like to make a little more power. It was a LSA crank
Old 12-11-2014, 04:55 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
408GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 966
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

I had 6165 Turbonetics on my 6.2 w/ .58 a/r housings and it choked them quickly. That .61 seems like they'd be too small if you stroked it. Maybe LJMS will chime in and set you on the right path.
Old 12-12-2014, 12:17 AM
  #5  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tim King
It's a T4 housing and just found out the are .61, On the dyno at 5700rpm the power would fall off so I'm trying to prevent that and would like to make a little more power. It was a LSA crank

Isnt the LSA a forged crank ? Strange it should break ?

What camshaft were you using ?

Cam, tuning, turbos, etc etc they'd all play a role with rpm's available. High backpressure on it's own isnt always a cause.

That said, the housing does sound on the small side.

Through lack of choice I've 0.88 housings on mine, but they spool well and seem to work. It would be nice to try larger though. Anything lower just sounds very very small. Although I guess it's also relative to compressor size.

What 67mm wheels are they ?
Old 12-12-2014, 07:54 AM
  #6  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 408GT
I had 6165 Turbonetics on my 6.2 w/ .58 a/r housings and it choked them quickly. That .61 seems like they'd be too small if you stroked it. Maybe LJMS will chime in and set you on the right path.
I was thinking the same thing .61 sounds pretty tight. I would have selected at least an .81
Old 12-12-2014, 11:30 AM
  #7  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
samdogmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alton, IL
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I run twin 66s with a .91ar turbine side. .58 sounds insanely small to me
Old 12-12-2014, 11:35 AM
  #8  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by samdogmx
I run twin 66s with a .91ar turbine side. .58 sounds insanely small to me
How do those spool? What CI are you running? Mine don't really kick on untill around 3500
Old 12-12-2014, 11:46 AM
  #9  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Tim King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Isnt the LSA a forged crank ? Strange it should break ?

What camshaft were you using ?

Cam, tuning, turbos, etc etc they'd all play a role with rpm's available. High backpressure on it's own isnt always a cause.

That said, the housing does sound on the small side.

Through lack of choice I've 0.88 housings on mine, but they spool well and seem to work. It would be nice to try larger though. Anything lower just sounds very very small. Although I guess it's also relative to compressor size.

What 67mm wheels are they ?
Yes it was a forged crank
223/223 .625/.625 114
Old 12-12-2014, 02:48 PM
  #10  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Is that a huge crack across the journal ?

Is that a cause or symptom of it running the big ends there too ?
Old 12-12-2014, 02:52 PM
  #11  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Tim King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah its cracked across the whole thing, you can put your finger in it and flex it.
Old 12-13-2014, 03:51 AM
  #12  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Wow, that's crazy.

Must surely be a manufacturing defect for it to do that ?
Old 12-13-2014, 05:33 AM
  #13  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Tim King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Wow, that's crazy.

Must surely be a manufacturing defect for it to do that ?
Yeah that's what I think. Of course gm won't take responsibility. I decided to return my ls3 block in exchange for an lsx block, is there anything different that I need to change. Or is it a direct replacement block?
Old 12-13-2014, 07:26 AM
  #14  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

TBH certainly this part of the world, there would never be any warranty on performance parts, especially given the wide range of applications they would be used for. Even with a manufacturers defect, but I'd still say in that case it should be a very good argument.

I've never used an LSx block, I'd never want the weight penalty. But pretty sure there are quite a few install differences between it and the other factory blocks.

So no it isnt a total direct replacement.
Old 12-13-2014, 08:18 AM
  #15  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
samdogmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alton, IL
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

the lsx block uses a unique rear cover and cam retainer plate but they come with it.

Its does not have the rear cam sensor hole either so you have to use a gen4 front cover and valley cover, but if you had a ls3 those will work just not the early gen3 stuff.

Obviously it also has unique head gaskets and bolts/studs. But everything else is the same.
Old 12-13-2014, 08:24 AM
  #16  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
89lx-ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

we just recently did a twin setup on a 416 with 2 64mm basically hellion kit with upgrades turbo and it did 1029 spinning on a dynodynamics at 14 lbs
Old 12-13-2014, 09:04 AM
  #17  
6 Second Club Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would go with the ,96
Old 12-13-2014, 10:04 AM
  #18  
Teching In
 
inthestix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im have a 416 and talked to LilJohn and we went with twin s366s with an .88 housing.
Old 12-13-2014, 11:37 AM
  #19  
Staging Lane
 
lsx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

.96 ar housings on a 428 here
Old 12-13-2014, 11:42 AM
  #20  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

I take the lsx any day of the week once you see it sitting next to a production block.

As Sam said they are as close to drop in as they come. There is absolutely no comparison to decks and cylinder heft on a gen2 block compared to an OEM block

Not to mention the oiling.

Last edited by rotary1307cc; 12-13-2014 at 11:51 AM.


Quick Reply: 416 with twins?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 AM.