Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

intake manifold selection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2015, 12:17 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
kill4thril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: liverpool ny
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default intake manifold selection

http://m.ebay.com/itm/181614204353?nav=SEARCH

So I found this intake on ebay and was just wondering what you guys think of it for a boosted car or if I should just go with somthing different? Thanks for the help
Jesse
Old 01-04-2015, 01:06 PM
  #2  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Your link doesn't work.

Virtually any intake will work.
Old 01-04-2015, 02:24 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
cacmanjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

http://m.ebay.com/itm/181614204353?
Old 01-04-2015, 02:44 PM
  #4  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

I would avoid those. Short runner and large plenum so you'll lose lots of part throttle torque and torque out of boost. Low and mid range will suffer all together. You'd have to be turning some serious RPM or moving lots of air to actually see any benefit to those.
Old 01-04-2015, 03:15 PM
  #5  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Stock ls3 vs that manifold
Old 01-04-2015, 03:21 PM
  #6  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Marginal gains above 6200 rpm.
Old 01-04-2015, 03:37 PM
  #7  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Runner entry is horrible on them, this is that fixed up

This was a 376, cam used was a 224/232-113

Old 01-04-2015, 03:43 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Marginal yes, but looks like a decent 800rpm more available.

I'd imagine with some boost any differences at the lower-mid range would be far less too provided you make some boost from say 4k+

For the cheap fabricated intakes though, it does look better than some of the others
Old 01-04-2015, 04:01 PM
  #9  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

I'm still not sold on it being much better in boost. You would have to be running enough boost with a good enough backpressure ratio to make sure intake velocity stays high before you would start to see it pull away from other intakes.
Old 01-04-2015, 04:08 PM
  #10  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

If you are going to push a 4 bolt hard and have a a lot of turbine capacity it looks like a winner to me

Going down the track with the motor shifting at 7.5 dropping down near 6 it will be happy, hg will too.
Old 01-04-2015, 08:10 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
kill4thril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: liverpool ny
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you for the help guys love the comparison charts my friend building a 370 with a s366 I think is what he said sent it to me in a link and got me thinking about one for my 408 with an s480 would the change in ci be big enough to bring any difference? Or would I be better off looking in to a holley carb style intake?
Old 01-05-2015, 05:15 AM
  #12  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

If you want the visuals and can accept there may be quality issues, then go for it.

Otherwise the factory type plastic intakes are really good value.
Old 01-05-2015, 06:12 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
alocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc
Runner entry is horrible on them, this is that fixed up

This was a 376, cam used was a 224/232-113

There are 2 versions of this intake that look identical from the outside but the one posted is a new version with bells on the runners. Can you confirm which intake was used in your testing?
Old 01-09-2015, 04:32 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Presumably this.

http://onthedyno.com/GM-LS-motor/art...abricated-ls3/
Old 01-09-2015, 04:51 PM
  #15  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
blackmagicturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ventura
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice lookin manifold ,,all these n/a graphs no turbo graphs ?
Old 01-09-2015, 05:07 PM
  #16  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

They do have quite a few tests on that OnTheDyno page and FB page, but not aware of any boosted tests with those intakes.

I would think though that one we start to see some decent positive pressure, any losses with the sheet metal intake would probably be less vs the plastic.

So it should be a win win unless it was a fairly large cam or particularly laggy setup. In which case it might help to tune n/a as best as possible to keep performance good off boost and then let boost take over at the top end as it will tend to do anyway



Quick Reply: intake manifold selection



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.