Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

What size engine for my turbo ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2015, 06:26 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Johnv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default What size engine for my turbo ?

I am building a project car, road legal but will mainly be used for drag racing and events such as power cruise.
car will weigh around 1300 kgs and will be running a powerglide trans.

The turbo i'm going to use is an IHI RX8 ex CART car turbo, pretty trick bit of gear, Magnesium compressor housing, incinol wheels, titanium exhaust housing, triple ceramic bearing..., very compact as the compressor scroll is inboard of the backing plate, and only weighs around 7kgs.

Specs are hard to find, but measuring it, it has a billet compressor wheel, inducer = 77mm, exducer = 91mm.
turbine wheel inducer = 89mm, exducer = 79mm and has a 1.20 housing

rated to 1200 hp plus , from what I've been able to find the engines where 2.65 ltr v8 running up to 15,000 rpm and using methanol.

Bought the turbo off a mate that had it in a mild 5.7 ls1, made 620rwhp at 11psi but was quite laggy, but made huge gains for every extra psi added.

I have a new LY6 cast block , and my initial plan was to use a 4" callies crank I already have and build a 403 ci forged engine.

But now i'm thinking a std stroke 364 ci may be a better match for the turbo ?

would like to run around 20 psi boost and was hoping for 900 rwhp plus.

Thoughts ????
Old 03-26-2015, 06:30 PM
  #2  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Either will probably be fine to be honest. You didn't mention if this was a T4 or T6 housing, but the 79/89mm turbine will be near its limit on a 403. You should make your goals either way.
Old 03-26-2015, 07:50 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
a-low's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Whittier, Kalifornia
Posts: 578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Any pictures of that turbo?
Old 03-26-2015, 08:52 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Johnv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
Either will probably be fine to be honest. You didn't mention if this was a T4 or T6 housing, but the 79/89mm turbine will be near its limit on a 403. You should make your goals either way.
it's a 3" V band housing.
I believe there is a 2.0 AR housing I can get ahold of as well.
Old 03-26-2015, 10:11 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Johnv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default





Old 03-26-2015, 10:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
TurboS10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Waxahachie, Tx
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your mate either had-
another issue or
the 1.2 was the problem
Or that 77mm compressor moves a lot of air and the turbine isn't big enough for a 347 due to the back press ratio going up on the bigger motor.
Bigger motor takes less boost to move the same amount of air.
But the turbine still needs the same inlet pressure to move that much air (simplifying) so exhaust reversion goes up and power drops.

You have a 77/79 combo.
A billet 76 mm with a bigger comp housing than your 77 will make 1200 hp on a 364 and about 30-32 psi right at the compressor outlet- but it's a 76/84 setup.

Not sure what turbine you have in your sig 76mm. Check the back pressure on your thumper setup and let it guide you.

The above 76/84 is a forced inductions S476-92 ETR HO special order not listed on their site. Does low 160's in the 1/4 at 3200lbs w/glide and 3.25's.
Search Stock48 screen name on this board.
Old 03-26-2015, 11:54 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Johnv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TurboS10
Your mate either had-
another issue or
the 1.2 was the problem
Or that 77mm compressor moves a lot of air and the turbine isn't big enough for a 347 due to the back press ratio going up on the bigger motor.
Bigger motor takes less boost to move the same amount of air.
But the turbine still needs the same inlet pressure to move that much air (simplifying) so exhaust reversion goes up and power drops.

You have a 77/79 combo.
A billet 76 mm with a bigger comp housing than your 77 will make 1200 hp on a 364 and about 30-32 psi right at the compressor outlet- but it's a 76/84 setup.

Not sure what turbine you have in your sig 76mm. Check the back pressure on your thumper setup and let it guide you.

The above 76/84 is a forced inductions S476-92 ETR HO special order not listed on their site. Does low 160's in the 1/4 at 3200lbs w/glide and 3.25's.
Search Stock48 screen name on this board.
The 76 thumper on my other car only has the 68mm turbine wheel, has made 800 rwhp and spools almost instantly, will have much higher back pressure than the IHI though.
Mates car was m6 , I don't think it will be so bad with a decent converter.
I'm thinking the turbine flows pretty good being designed for an ultra hi revving methanol powered engine.



A forged 364 May be a better combo, but I already have a 4" striker crank and was keen on a 403.
Old 03-27-2015, 09:19 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
DHR Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Olympia Wa.
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pair the turbo to the engine, not the other way around.
Old 03-27-2015, 10:58 AM
  #9  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
mkvamso's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

New that turbo cost close to 20k
I'd usually side with Darren here but that's a really sweet piece, I'd make it work with what you have.

Didn't those cart cars only use like 9-10 psi?
Might need a lot of exhaust flow and a small amount of boost to try and replicate what the turbo was designed for
Old 03-27-2015, 11:23 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
BlwnLs1GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Someone mounted that compressor housing on backwords. Try turning it around and it should run properly.









Old 03-27-2015, 02:11 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Johnv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mkvamso
New that turbo cost close to 20k
I'd usually side with Darren here but that's a really sweet piece, I'd make it work with what you have.

Didn't those cart cars only use like 9-10 psi?
Might need a lot of exhaust flow and a small amount of boost to try and replicate what the turbo was designed for
Yes I had read they were a $20k turbo !!!!!!
I believe they ran up to 21.8 psi with push to pass .

It's a pretty special piece , and I want to make it work, so my options are,
Forged 5.3, 6.0, 6.7, I have a used 5.3 block and a new ly6 6.0 block and want to leave as much meat in the bores as possible .
Old 03-27-2015, 02:43 PM
  #12  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

I'd go with the new Ly6 block and bore it as little as possible. The turbo will be happier and you'll have better block integrity. Crank the boost up till it makes the power you’re after. Can’t imagine that turbo would be anywhere near it’s limit at 20lbs.
.



Quick Reply: What size engine for my turbo ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM.