Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

TT 408 numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2015, 09:53 AM
  #61  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
Orr89rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by asubennett
Depends on if you half fill with aluminum heads or iron for heat dissipatation. LOL

Look at non lsx x275 turbo cars that are running bottom 4s to the 8th at 170 plus. All aluminum heads regardless of motor platform.

If your hell bent on iron heads do it and report back. My hunch is you will knock or break something because of the heat retention with a normal, traditional boosted ls tuneup.

Now part of that might be lack of availability in iron tho. Aluminum is lighter anf easier to machine and port. And its lighter. Hence why alot of iron heads are being phased out, even in sbc world. Only ppl who run iron seem to be in classes that specify iron only.

There arent many iron lsx heads are there? Wasnt it only like 1-2 years in production in super early truck motors? And they werent real good to begin with. Anyone making aftermarket iron cores?
Old 04-16-2015, 11:05 AM
  #62  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Plenty of iron headed cars making BIG power. They are using race castings with thick decks though. Tom Vaught over on theturboforums ran a 406 Pontiac at over 38lbs of boost with Iron heads/block for 3 years without ever pulling a head off. He also ran no head gasket…trapping mid 190’s in a 3000lb chassis.

I wouldn’t worry about the Iron causing detonation/performance loss. That’s been beat to death over the years. Still no valid proof to back up one is better than the other. Heat retention isn’t necessarily a bad thing and more IGN lead isn’t always a good thing. That aside there aren’t any decent iron castings out there for an LS I’m aware of. I’d go with the thickest deck 6-bolt alum head you could find and a nice aftermarket block/crank if you want reliability. 1300whp on OEM anything will be far from reliable IMO.

Lots of those “1000 HP” super cars really aren’t putting up great times. I think you’d be surprised how well your car would do if you got a clean pass with enough gear as it sits. Racing 1500ft isn’t going to generate much more heat than a ¼ mile run. Are you planning on half mile stuff too?
Old 04-16-2015, 11:57 AM
  #63  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Plenty of iron headed cars making BIG power. They are using race castings with thick decks though. Tom Vaught over on theturboforums ran a 406 Pontiac at over 38lbs of boost with Iron heads/block for 3 years without ever pulling a head off. He also ran no head gasket…trapping mid 190’s in a 3000lb chassis.

I wouldn’t worry about the Iron causing detonation/performance loss. That’s been beat to death over the years. Still no valid proof to back up one is better than the other. Heat retention isn’t necessarily a bad thing and more IGN lead isn’t always a good thing. That aside there aren’t any decent iron castings out there for an LS I’m aware of. I’d go with the thickest deck 6-bolt alum head you could find and a nice aftermarket block/crank if you want reliability. 1300whp on OEM anything will be far from reliable IMO.

Lots of those “1000 HP” super cars really aren’t putting up great times. I think you’d be surprised how well your car would do if you got a clean pass with enough gear as it sits. Racing 1500ft isn’t going to generate much more heat than a ¼ mile run. Are you planning on half mile stuff too?

Interesting to hear that. Yes 1/2 mile and more are on the horizon for me in the future. I spoke with Erik @ HKE for an hour or so about all this last night and his response about 4 bolt heads lifting was mostly tune related. He also suggested a process that strengthens the corner of the bores (water jackets) I posted about this in another thread a few months ago and no one seemed to pay attention. His theory is when the motor is making big power and the cylinders start to flex and the deck Becomes distorted it is happening at these areas with no support. This is where the head is actually lifting. He seems to think with the right tuning and attention to detail 1300 on a 4 bolt is very possible. With that said im not sure i want to take it there.. The constant risk of failure in the event of even the slightest change steers me away. After all the dust clears with block modifications/Crank/Studs etc. A 6 bolt block could be had and done with less trouble.
Old 04-16-2015, 01:52 PM
  #64  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oscs
A 6 bolt block could be had and done with less trouble.
I agree. Unfortunately spending the big bucks on the right parts the first time around is almost always the best/cheapest route.
Old 04-16-2015, 03:33 PM
  #65  
TECH Fanatic
 
tblentrprz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,080
Received 177 Likes on 152 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oscs
Interesting to hear that. Yes 1/2 mile and more are on the horizon for me in the future. I spoke with Erik @ HKE for an hour or so about all this last night and his response about 4 bolt heads lifting was mostly tune related. He also suggested a process that strengthens the corner of the bores (water jackets) I posted about this in another thread a few months ago and no one seemed to pay attention. His theory is when the motor is making big power and the cylinders start to flex and the deck Becomes distorted it is happening at these areas with no support. This is where the head is actually lifting. He seems to think with the right tuning and attention to detail 1300 on a 4 bolt is very possible. With that said im not sure i want to take it there.. The constant risk of failure in the event of even the slightest change steers me away. After all the dust clears with block modifications/Crank/Studs etc. A 6 bolt block could be had and done with less trouble.
Sounds like you were talking about pinning the sleeves to secure the bore?

Be interesting to know how many deck issues/distortion and head sealing issues (may not be lifting?) are on cars with mounts vs plates.
Old 04-16-2015, 04:17 PM
  #66  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
roastin240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oscs
Right I understand all this. I'm pretty sure my 9:5.1 370 is making 1k already. Lower CR pistons are not going to get me to 1300whp.
What kind of boost are you having to run to get there? Any issues with long duration pulls at those high levels?
Old 04-16-2015, 04:29 PM
  #67  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

HP is not HP is not the case when speaking about cylinder pressure

Last edited by rotary1307cc; 04-16-2015 at 06:16 PM.
Old 04-16-2015, 05:50 PM
  #68  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oscs
Right I understand all this. I'm pretty sure my 9:5.1 370 is making 1k already. Lower CR pistons are not going to get me to 1300whp.
And why do you think this ?

Originally Posted by roastin240
What kind of boost are you having to run to get there? Any issues with long duration pulls at those high levels?

I dont think he's done any long duration pulls yet ? The last event was just 1500ft I think, so barely more than the standard 1/4
Old 04-16-2015, 09:20 PM
  #69  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
And why do you think this ?

I just don't see a drop in CR making more power at this point, not without a lot more boost. At 25/26 I'm sure I'm reaching the limits of what these 4 bolts can hold. Sure lower SCR will allow you to run more but at what point do returns diminish? I don't know the awnser to that.


I dont think he's done any long duration pulls yet ? The last event was just 1500ft I think, so barely more than the standard 1/4
Correct. The longest distance I've held 25lbs or more is 1500ft at a time and I've only done it 5/6 times.
Old 04-16-2015, 09:23 PM
  #70  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc
HP is not HP is not the case when speaking about cylinder pressure
These short awnser you have been providing lately are getting annoying. Speak up! Your one of the few ******** I actually listen to on here.
Old 04-16-2015, 09:25 PM
  #71  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roastin240
What kind of boost are you having to run to get there? Any issues with long duration pulls at those high levels?
I wish I could tell you how much I'm making for sure but it's all speculation at this point. I'll know shortly though as I scheduled a few hours dyno time to play around.

As far as long pulls, No clue.. Yet anyways.
Old 04-16-2015, 09:30 PM
  #72  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tblentrprz
Sounds like you were talking about pinning the sleeves to secure the bore?

Be interesting to know how many deck issues/distortion and head sealing issues (may not be lifting?) are on cars with mounts vs plates.
Im talking about pinning the bores not the sleeves, well a sleeve would be the same concept so yes. You are providing rigidity for the deck/upper cylinder bores. You have to obviously drill/tap these first. Set your plugs/mill/deck plate and bore like normal as this will distort the bores.
Old 04-16-2015, 09:51 PM
  #73  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
asubennett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oscs
Im talking about pinning the bores not the sleeves, well a sleeve would be the same concept so yes. You are providing rigidity for the deck/upper cylinder bores. You have to obviously drill/tap these first. Set your plugs/mill/deck plate and bore like normal as this will distort the bores.
Sounds like Honda ****, with block guards etc... Ha ha.
Old 04-16-2015, 11:07 PM
  #74  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oscs
These short awnser you have been providing lately are getting annoying. Speak up! Your one of the few ******** I actually listen to on here.
ha

everyone can agree tq is a good measure of average cylinder pressure

average cylinder pressure across one powerstroke delivers TQ


we have a cylinder pressure clamp limit with the 4 bolt deck, we know this



how do we make more HP without pushing past our clamp limit? RPM


lets say you take two engines the same size, both we limit to lets say 1000 ftlbs of tq


engine 1 tq curve is lower, it makes our 1000ftlbs at 6000rpm...... it develops 1142hp


engine 2 tq curve we shift higher but still the same 1000ftlbs, but at 7500 rpm.... it develops 1428hp


at higher rpm we have less dwell time at peak cylinder pressures too vs lower
Old 04-16-2015, 11:16 PM
  #75  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

look at the SBF, it has been around forever, it is almost identical in head design, deck layout, borespacing, and fasteners


big power is made, how??


look at the small displacement motors with 4 bolt decks, they make big power and clamp, how?

We know we dont want cylinder pressure over X during a single power cycle to keep things sealed up. so how do we make more power? we dont add pressure, we just add more power cycles for a given amount of time

this is why timing plays a huge roll.... average cylinder pressure across the full power stroke may not change much with a modest change in timing

but peak pressures move a ton, very easy to unseat the gasket
Old 04-17-2015, 12:24 AM
  #76  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

These are pics of each side of the motor. You can see exactly where it was failing. Head gaskets where trashed but didn't torch anything.

Name:  IMG_2312_zps9cad77be.jpg
Views: 95
Size:  2.19 MB

Name:  IMG_2311_zpsb63a7c05.jpg
Views: 78
Size:  2.30 MB
Old 04-17-2015, 12:25 AM
  #77  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

It looks the the only hole that wasn't leaking was #8.

Here is a close up of #4 I think.

Name:  IMG_2310_zps6c11ddfe.jpg
Views: 81
Size:  696.1 KB
Old 04-17-2015, 07:33 AM
  #78  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc
ha

everyone can agree tq is a good measure of average cylinder pressure

average cylinder pressure across one powerstroke delivers TQ


we have a cylinder pressure clamp limit with the 4 bolt deck, we know this



how do we make more HP without pushing past our clamp limit? RPM


lets say you take two engines the same size, both we limit to lets say 1000 ftlbs of tq


engine 1 tq curve is lower, it makes our 1000ftlbs at 6000rpm...... it develops 1142hp


engine 2 tq curve we shift higher but still the same 1000ftlbs, but at 7500 rpm.... it develops 1428hp


at higher rpm we have less dwell time at peak cylinder pressures too vs lower
I think I'm understanding. So what your saying is that with a broader RPM range (high torque curve) you are essentially spreading out the peak cylinder pressure over a greater distance.
Old 04-17-2015, 07:36 AM
  #79  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blown06
It looks the the only hole that wasn't leaking was #8.

Here is a close up of #4 I think.

I've been meaning to ask you what heads your running. Also since you have the short block apart why not go see Erik? Talk to him about support the cylinders.
Old 04-17-2015, 07:39 AM
  #80  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by asubennett
Sounds like Honda ****, with block guards etc... Ha ha.
Hey man there is something to be learned from those little bastards!


Quick Reply: TT 408 numbers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 PM.