Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

T-4 divided flange.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2015, 09:05 PM
  #1  
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default T-4 divided flange.

Has anyone tried removing the divider? If so has anyone tried having them ported? Any gains? I'm thinking about doing it to mine.
Old 01-01-2016, 01:11 AM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
 
crashly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I got the twin bw82 with 87mm turbine , 1.25 ar divided
methanol
smooth the edge off oh housing , not to a knife edge but
spool up was smoother .
not maxed them out yet
6.2's 1/4 @ 2300 lbs
Old 01-01-2016, 01:01 PM
  #3  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Why would you want to remove it? Cutting it back slightly and knife edging (dull knife edge anyway) it is what I've seen the "pros" do to help with laminar flow. I don't see how porting the inlet does anything? The exit volute diameter remains the same. It would be similar to running a larger hotside than necessary pre-turbo. It isn't going to change back pressure, just slow down the air. Thats the last thing you want to improve "spool-up".
Old 01-01-2016, 04:22 PM
  #4  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

I dont think you could ever completely remove it anyway ? but doing so would just be like going to a larger housing
Old 01-01-2016, 08:11 PM
  #5  
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
I dont think you could ever completely remove it anyway ? but doing so would just be like going to a larger housing
I can't see how it helps for max performance. Always looking for a edge. I have to run the t 4 to be legal in my class with a weight break. The inside of the housing is rough, thought it would help to smooth it and remove that divider?
Old 01-02-2016, 06:23 AM
  #6  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

But removing the divider is just turning it into an open scroll ? So why not just get an open scroll housing ?

Presumably your pipework leading to the turbo isnt divided either ?
Old 01-03-2016, 06:19 AM
  #7  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I've ported and about completely removed the divider in my 1.25 Divided T4 housing. Not sure how much it was worth but single T4 76mm @3420 lbs went 171.xx mph. Still has some power left in tune I think.
Old 01-03-2016, 09:05 PM
  #8  
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm going to pull out the grinder.
Old 01-03-2016, 10:33 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
The BallSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,668
Received 496 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

I'm running a undivided T4 flanged hot side with a TC78 with a divided 1.15AR and it spools stupid fast so I'm gonna leave it alone in case I decide to sell it.
Old 01-04-2016, 04:11 AM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
 
crashly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by LASTLS1
I'm going to pull out the grinder.
what does the guy say , that you bought the turbos from ??
Old 01-05-2016, 04:27 AM
  #11  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
MrPotatoeHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Worth, IL
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Everywhere Ive read, says the twin scroll comes from them being based of the diesel world where each scroll is fed by a different bank. I see no need for a twin scroll in a twin turbo application. Inst that why Tial made v band inlets?
Old 01-05-2016, 05:30 AM
  #12  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MrPotatoeHead
Everywhere Ive read, says the twin scroll comes from them being based of the diesel world where each scroll is fed by a different bank. I see no need for a twin scroll in a twin turbo application. Inst that why Tial made v band inlets?
Twin scroll is largely about isolating valve events in the pipework to reduce effects of backpressure re-entering the cylinder.

This is much easier to do on a 4cyl motor than it ever will be on an 8cyl motor, but some say isolating each cylinder bank on a V is helpful too....I dont really see it other than perhaps if it helps maintain gas velocity using smaller tubing for each bank.


Tial made V band inlets so people could install their turbos with V-bands for easy fitting/removal.
Old 01-05-2016, 01:13 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
SenorThumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i don't know why on earth you would cut the divider out of a divided flange... just buy a undivided flange? Why did you buy a divided flange if you have a single scroll turbo to begin with? Maybe i'm missing something?
As I understand it:
A T4 divided flange should flow the same as a T4 undivided flange. The exhaust volume the motor produces under WOT is a relatively consistent scale. The restriction is the turbo, not the flange. So increasing the size of the flange or pre turbo piping will just slow the velocity of the exhaust down resulting in slower spool.
As stevieturbo (sort of) said, the whole point of a divided flange is to run a twin scroll turbo. The whole point of a twin scroll turbo is to group cyl's together by valve event so back pressure from one cyl isn't breathing into another cyl as the exhaust valve opens thus reducing back pressure, allowing the motor to rev faster thus spool a turbo faster...etc. Same basic principal as long tube headers on a non turbo motor, keep the cyls isolated
Old 01-05-2016, 01:57 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

For your first questions...I've no idea why people buy housings they dont need.

A T4 divided flange with a larger number will flow the same as an undivided with a smaller number. From what I understand the divider simply takes up space in that respect making it flow less.

Whether the restriction is the "turbo" or not....bad wording. The restriction is either the turbine wheel, or the turbine housing.

Sometimes there just seem to be more divided housing options so I guess if you want much larger you'd need to opt for the divided housing, and larger again, machine that divider away altogether.
Old 01-07-2016, 09:42 PM
  #15  
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well I'm grinding, I'll let you know the results next month.
Old 01-07-2016, 09:44 PM
  #16  
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Twin scroll is largely about isolating valve events in the pipework to reduce effects of backpressure re-entering the cylinder.

This is much easier to do on a 4cyl motor than it ever will be on an 8cyl motor, but some say isolating each cylinder bank on a V is helpful too....I dont really see it other than perhaps if it helps maintain gas velocity using smaller tubing for each bank.


Tial made V band inlets so people could install their turbos with V-bands for easy fitting/removal.
I wish I could use a v band housing!!!
Old 01-08-2016, 05:02 AM
  #17  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

TBH I considered it on mine....but if anything it would probably have made things more awkward.

I can just unbolt turbo/manifold as one piece very quickly. It'd be far harder and pointless to unbolt the turbo.

But V-Bands definitely are great and does put the whole divided scroll aspect in the bin for those wanting to use them

Last edited by stevieturbo; 01-08-2016 at 05:10 AM.
Old 01-08-2016, 07:43 AM
  #18  
TECH Regular
 
Teddy-2000RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I'm not sure how picky your sanctioning body is on "grey area" rules but why not take your current t4 housing, chop off the flange, and weld your vband of choice on. It's still "technically" a t4 housing just with a different flange. I doubt it would be allowed but it doesn't hurt to check.
Old 01-08-2016, 12:06 PM
  #19  
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Teddy-2000RS
I'm not sure how picky your sanctioning body is on "grey area" rules but why not take your current t4 housing, chop off the flange, and weld your vband of choice on. It's still "technically" a t4 housing just with a different flange. I doubt it would be allowed but it doesn't hurt to check.
Specifically says NO V BAND HOUSINGS , lol
Old 01-08-2016, 12:18 PM
  #20  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LASTLS1
Specifically says NO V BAND HOUSINGS , lol

Any reasons behind that ? Are V-Band housings supposed to flow better or something ?


Quick Reply: T-4 divided flange.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.