Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Turbos running out of steam

Old 02-01-2016, 12:48 PM
  #21  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
As mentioned above, you really need to know what temps/pressures are pre IC to see how well it’s doing its job. If the pressure drop across the core is too high, the turbos could be working past their efficiency zone and pumping excessively hot air.

A2W setups are hard to beat. You really don’t need a heat exchanger with them IMO. For something like you’re doing I’d run a 5 gallon tank and only circulate the water when you’re in boost. It should work about as well as your A2A that way for street use, and you can toss the ice in at the track for serious cooling. The exchanger isn’t going to get the water below ambient anyway. If the water is sitting in your tank it should be around ambient.

You really don’t want the charge temps super low with alcohol fuels. There’s a lot more fuel in the CC and it requires additional heat to help vaporize. I don’t know exactly what inlet temps are ideal with E85, but having enough heat in the charge to help vaporize the fuel is actually beneficial. Running inlet temps down in the 100* range with alky cars can actually hurt performance since the fuel can’t vaporize properly.

What A2W cores are you looking at? I’m sure you could get away with a pretty small high flow core if you bought a good one. That should lower the cost quite a bit. If you could get the inlet temps around 140-150* that would be perfect IMO.
Yeah didn't think about the heat helping with vaporizing the abundance of fuel E85 brings into the CC.. I guess in retrospect 170 isn't THAT bad but I would happy to see it a little lower. I think I'm over the whole A2W thing at this point. I have some big races coming up and don't really have time to deal with all the BS.
Old 02-01-2016, 01:06 PM
  #22  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,848
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oscs
Yeah didn't think about the heat helping with vaporizing the abundance of fuel E85 brings into the CC.. I guess in retrospect 170 isn't THAT bad but I would happy to see it a little lower. I think I'm over the whole A2W thing at this point. I have some big races coming up and don't really have time to deal with all the BS.
I agree 170* isn't horrible. But I'd think 2 66/65 precisions would move enough air to still be pretty darn efficient at 23lbs. I'd guess twins should be making less heat than say my single S476 at like boost levels. Yet your inlet temps seem higher which is odd. I'd see about 170* at 25lbs with my cheapo $90 Ebay IC.

May hook up some pressurized air and do a good leak check. Something sounds off, it's acting like its out of turbo. Maybe the 66/65's are just done on a 370 at the level you're running. 0-100psi pressure transducers are like $18 shipped. (grab a couple!) I'd wire one into the IC inlet area. Nice to have one on your cooling system too.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/271576977896?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Last edited by Forcefed86; 02-01-2016 at 04:28 PM.
Old 02-01-2016, 03:38 PM
  #23  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

What was ambient temp ?

170degF sounds pretty damn high, but if ambient is already high, then relatively speaking it isnt so bad.
I wouldnt even consider racing if mine was over 130degF, but ambients here would be cooler.

Are your air filters pulling cold air ?

Presumably those air temps quoted are without any form of water or meth injection ?
Old 02-01-2016, 04:19 PM
  #24  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
What was ambient temp ?

170degF sounds pretty damn high, but if ambient is already high, then relatively speaking it isnt so bad.
I wouldnt even consider racing if mine was over 130degF, but ambients here would be cooler.

Are your air filters pulling cold air ?

Presumably those air temps quoted are without any form of water or meth injection ?
Ambient was 75* at the most. It was a little heat soaked as the starting temp was around 95* the air filters are located close to the radiator but they both have a wide open shot to the front of the car so air flow should not be a big issue. These temps are with no cooling of any sort.
Old 02-01-2016, 04:27 PM
  #25  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

It would definitely be interesting to see pre/post IC data, just to see how much work the cores are actually doing.

Would also do no harm if you could stick a sensor near the mouth of one of the turbos, just in case somehow it is pulling warm air from the rad. Airflow can sometimes do strange things

The only time my air temps would ever get to near 130degF or so, is after a lot of sitting about and lots of heat soak. When on the road or racing they're never hotter than that. Up to around 20psi I'd often run without meth so just the IC doing any cooling and it copes fine.

Over that I'd generally use meth so obviously temps will be cooler.
Old 02-01-2016, 05:31 PM
  #26  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,848
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Do we know of any 66/65 turbo setups pushing this kind of power on a 370? I know wicked69's chevelle had 70/65 china copies and ran out of turbo pretty quickly on a 6.0.

Last edited by Forcefed86; 02-01-2016 at 06:05 PM.
Old 02-01-2016, 05:46 PM
  #27  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Do we know of any 66/65 precision turbo setups pushing this kind of power on a 370? I know wicked69's chevelle had 70/65 china copies and ran out of turbo pretty quickly on a 6.0.
These are turbonetics turbos
Old 02-01-2016, 05:47 PM
  #28  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I believe there was another member on here with a red TA that did a 390CI with these same turbos and made around 1050whp on corn
Old 02-01-2016, 05:47 PM
  #29  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

I wouldnt have thought the 66's would be that hard pushed at that level, and 370 is a decent motor size for them
Old 02-01-2016, 06:09 PM
  #30  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
I wouldnt have thought the 66's would be that hard pushed at that level, and 370 is a decent motor size for them
I thought they paired well together
Old 02-01-2016, 07:12 PM
  #31  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Well.. Guess what. I just ran the serial numbers on the turbos and it looks like Jose@FI sent me 62/65's with a .68 AR when I asked for 66/65's with the .81

Luckily TN is going to fix his screw up for FREE! He asked me what size blades I want... Any suggestions?
Old 02-01-2016, 07:15 PM
  #32  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Do the housings not state the A/R on them ?

I'd be measuring to make sure what you have, maybe the serial is listed as wrong or something ?

Sounds like a pretty big screw up really ?
Old 02-01-2016, 07:44 PM
  #33  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Do the housings not state the A/R on them ?

I'd be measuring to make sure what you have, maybe the serial is listed as wrong or something ?

Sounds like a pretty big screw up really ?
Pulling them now so I'll check. Never even thought to look as FI is "the place to go" sure enough I pulled the boxes from the attic and the ************* say 62-65..

Next question is what do I run now? TN will build whatever I want.
Old 02-01-2016, 07:55 PM
  #34  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,848
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Not saying they don't, but I don't see any sort of compressor map or flow rating for the 66/65 turbonetics units. Just curious.


*Edit*

Whoops screen didn't re-load... Though it sounded like it was running out of turbo. Jose would be the man to ask, just tell him your goals.
Old 02-01-2016, 07:57 PM
  #35  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Not saying they don't, but I don't see any sort of compressor map or flow rating for the 66/65 turbonetics units. Just curious.
Guy at TN said they are exactly the same as the Garrett units
Old 02-01-2016, 07:59 PM
  #36  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Mods can you please change the title to something more appropriate to the thread. I will change around some posts to suit the topic. I feel like this is doing Treadstone a disservice
Old 02-01-2016, 08:13 PM
  #37  
9 Second Club
 
Guard dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Just outside Memphis
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

6665 0.81 A/R T series should work great on a 370 with that lightweight chassis.
Old 02-01-2016, 08:16 PM
  #38  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guard dog
6665 0.81 A/R T series should work great on a 370 with that lightweight chassis.
Agreed but seeing as I'm running out of turbine.. I feel like some 67/67 could get me there lol! I have free rain to but whatever wheel will fit in these housings.
Old 02-01-2016, 08:22 PM
  #39  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Or why not some 72's like the 366..
Old 02-01-2016, 08:26 PM
  #40  
9 Second Club
 
Guard dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Just outside Memphis
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Then go 7268 with the 0.81 A/R in the T series. I wonder if they could put together a 6668 in the T series?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Turbos running out of steam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 AM.