Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

High altitude boost question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2016, 11:05 PM
  #21  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They would be seeing the same manifold kpa, and making the same uncorrected hp, thus seeing the same cylinder pressures.
Old 06-04-2016, 11:29 PM
  #22  
Staging Lane
 
lurker1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NitroFumesAteMyBrain
They would be seeing the same manifold kpa, and making the same uncorrected hp, thus seeing the same cylinder pressures.
I would think that the same kpa would not make the same power at altitude as at sea level just because there is less oxygen in the air being compressed at altitude. Or am I in left field?
Old 06-05-2016, 12:23 AM
  #23  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Lol. Stop looking at your damn boost gauge and start looking at your MAP sensor reading. The fact you're comparing boost 10 PSI from a gauge to 10 PSI from a gauge at sea level is absolutely absurd, because it becomes a relative term or an indirect factor and is useless.

~170 kPa on a MAP sensor is 170 kPa whether its at 10000' or sea level.
Old 06-05-2016, 12:57 AM
  #24  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thats exactly what im saying. Two identical engines at the same kpa are under the stress/load and should make the same hp regardless of what the boost gauge reads reguardless of altitude.
Old 06-05-2016, 11:12 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Lurker, the oxygen content is identical as sealevel, theres just less pressure at altitude helping you breathe said atmosphere
Old 06-06-2016, 06:28 AM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
LS1-IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 575
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I would use measured power output on the dyno to know what kind of stress you are putting on the motor, not a boost measurement.
Old 06-06-2016, 07:51 AM
  #27  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
cajundragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NitroFumesAteMyBrain
Thats exactly what im saying. Two identical engines at the same kpa are under the stress/load and should make the same hp regardless of what the boost gauge reads reguardless of altitude.
nope.

as mentioned in my previous- at altitude it will make less than sea level at the same manifold pressure.

the increased deltaP across the turbo compressor is one reason.
Old 06-06-2016, 09:31 AM
  #28  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cajundragger
nope.

as mentioned in my previous- at altitude it will make less than sea level at the same manifold pressure.

the increased deltaP across the turbo compressor is one reason.
The power loss isn't that extreme. Its not going to be proportional to DeltaP like it is in an N/A car. A turbo car at altitude is similar to the difference between a turbo car with and without an air filter at sea level. You are basically decreasing the pressure at the compressor inlet, which causes a higher pressure ratio which can decrease compressor efficiency a few percentage. This is why SAE corrections for turbo cars at altitude shouldn't be trusted.
Old 06-06-2016, 09:41 AM
  #29  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

In a round a bout way thats where im headed next. It seems like i just need to go back to dyno and tune on uncorrected numbers
Old 06-06-2016, 02:01 PM
  #30  
gpr
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
gpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NitroFumesAteMyBrain
Thats exactly what im saying. Two identical engines at the same kpa are under the stress/load and should make the same hp regardless of what the boost gauge reads reguardless of altitude.
This is incorrect. two engines making the same kpa will not make the same power, because at altitude that amount of oxygen in the air is less.
Old 06-06-2016, 02:02 PM
  #31  
gpr
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
gpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
The power loss isn't that extreme. Its not going to be proportional to DeltaP like it is in an N/A car. A turbo car at altitude is similar to the difference between a turbo car with and without an air filter at sea level. You are basically decreasing the pressure at the compressor inlet, which causes a higher pressure ratio which can decrease compressor efficiency a few percentage. This is why SAE corrections for turbo cars at altitude shouldn't be trusted.
This is correct. If you do the math you will be down about 7% on power running same boost level as a car at sea level.
Old 06-06-2016, 02:31 PM
  #32  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The oxygen content is the same, the pressure is whats different. Two engines at the same kpa will see the same internal loading. The higher altitude engine will be seeing more gauge pressure to build the same internal koa though.
Old 06-07-2016, 01:13 PM
  #33  
gpr
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
gpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NitroFumesAteMyBrain
The oxygen content is the same, the pressure is whats different. Two engines at the same kpa will see the same internal loading. The higher altitude engine will be seeing more gauge pressure to build the same internal koa though.
That is not correct. The percent of oxygen content does not change no matter what the boost pressure. You start with less oxygen at altitude and will still have less oxygen PERCENTAGE.

for example you boost both engines to 20psi absolute pressure. At sea level you start with 20% oxygen content, and at elevation you start with 10%. at 20psi sea level there is still 20% oxygen in the compressed air, and still 10% oxygen in the compressed air at elevation.

the only thing different is that at elevation you start at 12.2 atmosphere psi, and are adding 7.8 psi of boost to get to 20psi overall. At sea level you start at 14.7 and add 5.3psi, oxygen content does not change.

I hope this makes sense, not sure how else to explain it. Every thing being equal the same absolute pressures will always make less power the higher the elevation.
Old 06-07-2016, 01:17 PM
  #34  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I hate to inform u but the oxygen percentage is 20.8 here just like it is at sea level. There is not less oxygen, just less pressure to help ypu breath that oxygen.
Old 06-07-2016, 01:19 PM
  #35  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The oxygen content on mt everest is 20.8 as well, once again...less pressure
Old 06-07-2016, 03:35 PM
  #36  
gpr
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
gpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Your saying the in a 1 cube foot container the oxygen contain is the same everywhere in the world? Base on your logic cars at sea level and mt. everest will make the same power....

I'm not trying to argue with you, just trying to explaining twhy you won't make the same power as a sea level engine with the exact same absolute boost pressure.
Old 06-07-2016, 05:01 PM
  #37  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ive worked on fuel cars and tuned alcohol cars for close to twelve years, been drag racing my entire life, and tune throttle stop cars and bracket cars by DA. Im pretty sure i have the bases covered concerning why we turn the wick up at altitude orwhy we change tune ups to run specific et for weather change.
At 5000' your percentage of o2 is still 20.8 you have less pressure to condense that 20.8% into one cubic foot of air thus giving you less volume of oxygen and all other componets that make up our atmosphere. They will not make the same n/a power because there is less pressure assisting that engine to breathe.
What i am saying is that 1 cubic foot of air pressurized at 14.7 psia at sea level will indeed have the same oxygen volume as 1 cubic foot of air presdurized at 14.7 psia at 5000'.
Theres not less oxygen, just less pressure.
Old 06-07-2016, 05:05 PM
  #38  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So yes on mt everest, if u were to pack 1 cubic foot of air into a container and kept packing in air(just like a compressor) until it reached 14.7 psia, you would have the same volume of oxygen as you would at sea level.
Old 06-07-2016, 05:30 PM
  #39  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
NitroFumesAteMyBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The makeup of the air you breathe is always 78% nitrogen 21% oxygen, the volume of those componets are decided by the pressure your at. You get less volume at altitude because theres less pressure to assist and compact that atmosphere. If you were to run around at 10000 feet with a bubble around your head and a little compressor compressing that air to 14.7 psia you would have no issues breathing. The air is thin because its less dense, not because of oxygen percentage.
Barometer is the number one contributing factor in DA tuning. We add and subtract fuel out of our tune ups due to da change. This is why et changes throughout the day. Theoretically your engine is going up and down in altitude all day. This is caused by changes in pressure, not oxygen percentage going up and down.
Old 06-07-2016, 08:35 PM
  #40  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Nitroused383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You must account for increased back pressure of the turbine wheel and compressor discharge temp. 200 Kpa at sea level will make more power than 200 kpa at 10,000' elevation. Sea level would be around 15 psi and 10,000' would be 20 psi.


Quick Reply: High altitude boost question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 AM.