Budget Turbo For 700 rwhp
#21
Compression right now is roughly 11:1. I know with 93 octane and meth, that would be fine, but at the same time adding a meth kit just adds more money to the build. And if the additional flow of the heads isn't going to matter much on a boosted application, the 317's sound like a better option.
#22
TECH Veteran
I wonder how a 317 head will do with a nitrous exhaust port deal on your turbo build.....
#23
Compression right now is roughly 11:1. I know with 93 octane and meth, that would be fine, but at the same time adding a meth kit just adds more money to the build. And if the additional flow of the heads isn't going to matter much on a boosted application, the 317's sound like a better option.
#24
Yes, fuel system will need to be addressed too. I'd like to do 80lb/hr injectors and some type of twin or bigger stock bucket pump. I'd also like to run stock fuel lines and regulator. Again, not trying to set any records with the setup, but realistically be around the 700 rwhp mark. I've read countless builds where it's been done by sampling using bigger injectors and an in tank pump.
#25
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Yes, fuel system will need to be addressed too. I'd like to do 80lb/hr injectors and some type of twin or bigger stock bucket pump. I'd also like to run stock fuel lines and regulator. Again, not trying to set any records with the setup, but realistically be around the 700 rwhp mark. I've read countless builds where it's been done by sampling using bigger injectors and an in tank pump.
#27
I see you are using a Monster stage 3 clutch. By the time you are done with your build, you may find yourself at the limit of your clutch. I believe it's good for 700ft/lbs. These turbo builds tend to be VERY torque happy...you may find yourself over 700ft/lbs. Which really is a good problem to have.
#29
TECH Enthusiast
Originally Posted by ls1charged
any idea what your C/R is with your current heads? if its higher then stock i would sell them and get some 317's to drop compression and use the left over money on springs,PR's and turbo cam
#30
TECH Regular
If this is a street car, I would not recommend the 88mm. Yes, it will work.....but will likely hate it pretty quick. The 7876 will make less power, but will be more fun...more responsive. A .96 will be fine for street/strip duty. All of this is assuming you are using something 6.0 and under.
#31
the 88mm is .96 ar just so u know its a perfect street turbo my wife is ordering one too stock block stock cube 346 man i just didnt like the on3 76 never tried the 78 but spec wise the 88 is near identical to alot of turbo manufacturers 76mm strwet strip budget 5-800 hp range
#32
TECH Regular
backpressure was a big issue and like u said it didnt feel like it was gaining power after 5200 or so my 88 back halves like a beast of course its all 1/8 mile so not as impressive as others but still a 550$ turbi that fit under a stock hood on a t4 frame and 4" downpipe was pretty easy to work with now a pt88 or like turbo i could see being as u described as a street car but this little guy seems to love it
#35
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
i had a ebay 7683 on my stock ls1 and traction was a joke, lightening fast spool! if you want crazy fast spool and less then ~550 hp thats the way to go on a stock ls1 IMO... only thing i didnt like was cruising on the highway at 80 in 6th gear if i breathed on the throttle i would see 1-2psi, if i did it over again id proli do a .96 and a small turbo cam to try to balance it out
#36
Restricted User
Unless you have a 6.0 (and maybe even if you did), I would just go with the 7875. You can still make 750 wheel with a 6.0 and a 7875.
#39
Restricted User
I personally wouldn't bother with the 88mm for 700whp.
Its a copy of the old PT88 which is a pretty inefficient design. Big compressor wheel, small compressor housing, small turbine.
Its a copy of the old PT88 which is a pretty inefficient design. Big compressor wheel, small compressor housing, small turbine.