E85 or 93+meth is the question? any advice
09-30-2016, 09:00 PM
#21
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-01-2016, 04:13 AM
#24
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yo ouch...mine might be 6$ also, havent checked though tbh, ill probably just go E85 because everywhere i go on a daily basis has a e85 pump close to it, if anything ill get a tune for both 93 octane and e85 and go from there. Then use a controller to choose what setup to be on..not that i really want to do that because those controllers are insanely expensive but might have too. id rather stay on e85 but if i ever get the drive to drive to like..idk, indana? id have to go 93.
10-01-2016, 06:58 AM
#26
9 Second Club
There are 2 benefits to using water. One is price, and two is a better ability to remove heat. The price is negligible compared to all the other racing issues. Heat removal WOULD be a big deal if meth and water were on equal playing grounds. However, meth is a fuel, and water is just the opposite. This means you can spray enough meth to do the same cooling as water without being concerned about lowering power. The fact that "any idiot can dump a load of meth in" is a testament to how well it works. As for the pumps, the meth rating is all about longevity. How many people here keep the same build long enough to worry about corrosion?
10-01-2016, 07:49 AM
#27
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if only I had a garage for said action sadly I do not lol.