Ideal timing for coolest engine at idle?
09-27-2016, 06:47 AM
#42
Thats the funny part......I already did fine something wrong with it, citing a reputable 3rd party source, and you STILL dont understand cause you're too wrapped up in spitting out your own garbage based on theory. I can't tell you how many times THEORY learned in school doesn't match REALITY once you're out there actually engineering stuff. It's okay, I now understand, you're too locked into your own way of thinking and assume you know everything down to quantum physics instead of sitting back, shut up, and listen to people who are actually doing this stuff in the real world and have been for years. It's ashame too, I didn't think you were that old that you were set in your ways.
09-27-2016, 10:53 AM
#45
1. actually the real reason is because of the design of the circuit and it's components, and there is an even more specific reason after that involving programming, and again, another even deeper one involving electrons and atomic theory, and then finally quantum physics and observations and whatever god wants. The real reason is simple: it isn't perfect. Your reason is no better.
2. Who cares why it reads wrong? Does that change anything? No. You argue a futile point because at the endof the day: The wideband is still wrong. Which was my only point. I don't give a **** how you quantify that. It's wrong and you have to stop using it, and use your head.
2. Who cares why it reads wrong? Does that change anything? No. You argue a futile point because at the endof the day: The wideband is still wrong. Which was my only point. I don't give a **** how you quantify that. It's wrong and you have to stop using it, and use your head.
How long does this guy get to go on and on trolling people before the people in charge get rid of him? There is NO contribution going on here from this guy and only mucks up threads with good info.
09-30-2016, 07:01 AM
#59
yes, please do this. I think it would go a long way to establishing your credibility.
I don't mean this as a dig at you personally, but your posting pattern often makes me wonder if you are some sort of advanced AI that has read all sorts of tuning forums and collates the data into an indecipherable word salad intended to troll us.
I don't mean this as a dig at you personally, but your posting pattern often makes me wonder if you are some sort of advanced AI that has read all sorts of tuning forums and collates the data into an indecipherable word salad intended to troll us.
09-30-2016, 07:39 AM
#60
Not trying to feed into any bullshit here but ive tuned alot of cars that need much richer idles then stoich
Its pretty easy to hear the tone change in the engine when the fueling is right. Sometimes when i try to target a "perfect" idle mixture, it will get poppy and unstable.
Same goes for ignition timing. Start low, and raise it until i stop hearing a change.
I did see with my lq4 that when i raised the ignition timing, i dropped a bunch of coolant temp at idle.
Its pretty easy to hear the tone change in the engine when the fueling is right. Sometimes when i try to target a "perfect" idle mixture, it will get poppy and unstable.
Same goes for ignition timing. Start low, and raise it until i stop hearing a change.
I did see with my lq4 that when i raised the ignition timing, i dropped a bunch of coolant temp at idle.