Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

2" piping too small?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2016, 02:59 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Boostedbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 71
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default 2" piping too small?

Hi guys, I'm getting ready to start building the pipes coming off the stock truck manifolds to go to the turbo. Motor is a 5.3 btr stage 1 turbo cam, running stock truck manifolds and will be using the on3 7875 .96 a/r. now my question is will 2" od pipe be too restrictive? I'm trying to to build the most responsive and fastest spooling setup as possible and keep exhaust velocity high. The inside diameter of the pipe is 1.78" because it's thick walled. I feel like this is just slightly too small for what I'm doing with a goal of 700whp. I only ask because i can get this stuff all day long (mandrel) at work for next to nothing and its good steel.
Old 11-23-2016, 04:12 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
 
Dimeomboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Emory Texas currently
Posts: 484
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boostedbrick
Hi guys, I'm getting ready to start building the pipes coming off the stock truck manifolds to go to the turbo. Motor is a 5.3 btr stage 1 turbo cam, running stock truck manifolds and will be using the on3 7875 .96 a/r. now my question is will 2" od pipe be too restrictive? I'm trying to to build the most responsive and fastest spooling setup as possible and keep exhaust velocity high. The inside diameter of the pipe is 1.78" because it's thick walled. I feel like this is just slightly too small for what I'm doing with a goal of 700whp. I only ask because i can get this stuff all day long (mandrel) at work for next to nothing and its good steel.


i use two inch piping on my 5.7 iron block on3 88mm and made the hp your looking for with tick performance cam
but the on3 went out with very few hours on it just an f.y.i. but i like my size pipe turbo lights off very quick with a 3.27 gear
Old 11-23-2016, 04:13 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Boostedbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 71
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dimeomboost
i use two inch piping on my 5.7 iron block on3 88mm and made the hp your looking for with tick performance cam
but the on3 went out with very few hours on it just an f.y.i. but i like my size pipe turbo lights off very quick with a 3.27 gear
was that 2" od?
Old 11-23-2016, 04:42 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
 
Dimeomboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Emory Texas currently
Posts: 484
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boostedbrick
was that 2" od?
Two inches schedule 10 stainless steel pipe from the dumpster at my work
Old 11-23-2016, 04:43 PM
  #5  
TECH Regular
 
Dimeomboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Emory Texas currently
Posts: 484
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boostedbrick
was that 2" od?

2 inch i.d. and 2 3/8 o.d.
Old 11-23-2016, 04:49 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Boostedbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 71
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yeah that sounds like the perfect size, however the stuff I have is 2" od and 1.78" id, I feel like this might be on the restrictive side, that's why I'm asking. does anyone think this would cause any back pressure problems? or stop me from making 650-700whp?
Old 11-23-2016, 05:09 PM
  #7  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
yenkomike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: oxford mi
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 181 Likes on 96 Posts

Default

there is a thread on just this subject on y.b. I have made a couple with that turbo and a 5.3 with a triple 12 cam and a 2.5 hot side . it spools fast on the 2 step at 3500 rpm it will build 7 or 8 psi pretty fast. and once released it will get to 20 psi in 8 tenths of a second.works pretty good. your 2" pipes will get you to 6 or 700 but it will be maxed out pretty hard.

really doesn't give you room to grow.
Old 11-23-2016, 05:35 PM
  #8  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
VodeAn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I agree, 2 inch OD might be very limiting after 6 or 700.
Should be okay if that's all you want.

I like using 2 1/4" OD 16 gauge, supports well over 1000hp

A few years ago I made the mistake of using 2 1/2" on my 300zx and Thunderbird, both 5.3L builds, wayy too big for a 600ish hp setup.
Old 11-23-2016, 06:27 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Boostedbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 71
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I was going to just buy some 16ga 2.25 od off ebay, then I realized I can have this 2" bent however I needed for next to nothing, it's killing me haha cause I really wanna start making pipes but don't wanna have to do it twice because I know I'll wanna go higher in the future. I haven't read anybody going that small so im kinda on the fence about it...I mean the stock truck manifolds are 2.5" so right off the manifolds I would be Taking out roughly .750" but that might be a good thing for fast spool up and velocity. just don't know how small to small is haha
Old 11-23-2016, 07:13 PM
  #10  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
FourG63 97GST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 295
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

read your heart out

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...over-pipe.html
Old 11-23-2016, 07:44 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Boostedbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 71
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yeah I did for like an hour straight already, nobody really mentions 2" crossover pipes or wether that's I.D or O.D.... maybe I'll be the first to try ?? idk
Old 11-23-2016, 08:32 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Boostedbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 71
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So after more reading, I think I'm gonna go for it. however, I think I'm going to run a 44mm wastegate per bank coming right off the manifold outlet BEFORE the 2" crossover pipe, that way there will be no back pressure issues while still having the fastest spool possible running the small pipes. if that makes sense. sounds good anyway...
Old 11-23-2016, 11:42 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sbcgenII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort hood
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Use cheaper pipe but spend more on wastegates makes perfect sense for this thread.
Old 11-24-2016, 05:35 AM
  #14  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Boostedbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 71
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sbcgenII
Use cheaper pipe but spend more on wastegates makes perfect sense for this thread.
I was going to run twin wastegates before, but had planned on putting them close to the turbo coming off the pipes. My thinking is that having them coming right off the manifolds will reduce any excess back pressure IF any under boost, but under light throttle there should be awesome low end torque and response with this size piping...? I mean if it's a bad idea and someone can tell me why I will gladly just buy the larger piping...
Old 11-24-2016, 08:54 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,330
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

at higher flows small pipe becomes a restriction.

i dont think it'll keep you from 700hp in any way, but it will create higher drive pressures at the same boost pressure than a larger diameter would.

now for some totally anecdotal evidence...

I was in a similar spot as you this time last year, except for coming from the other direction. I was going to use 2.5 O.D schedule 10 stainless weld els and a standard 69mm gt45. After some reading I realized I didnt want to make myself an outlier in case I had problems. For my first scratch turbo build, I want the same cookie-cutter build as everyone else so I could get help diagnosing and troubleshooting.

So with the hot side partially built I scrapped it and went to 2.25 .065" exhaust tubing. I still want to try using SS weld els since they hold heat much better than thinwall tubing.

That wastegate placement might not be ideal and I can't really explain why. In school we learned that hot gasses very rapidly equalize pressure in a given space, but I guess that doesn't apply to exhaust since there are pulses? I'd put the gate(s) as close to the turbo as possible.
Old 11-24-2016, 08:56 AM
  #16  
TECH Regular
 
Nathaninwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had these same questions about a year ago when I turbod my stuff You can read night and day on the subject. I ended up with 2.25 od tubing as recommended by my camshaft guy in the end. We had a great talk about header design in turbo applications, and how cams affect both intake and final exhaust decisions

With that said, do yourself a favor and weld in an 1/8 inch pipe port and buy the 25.00 eBay 100psi sensor. Even if you can't log it, you can still monitor voltage and convert it to pressure in the system

Last edited by Nathaninwa; 11-24-2016 at 09:15 AM.
Old 11-24-2016, 09:15 AM
  #17  
TECH Regular
 
Nathaninwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I found with the thinner tubing of you ceramic coats it, it holds heat really well, and usually get my whole hot side done and the engine bays downpipe stuff done

Originally Posted by truckdoug
at higher flows small pipe becomes a restriction.

i dont think it'll keep you from 700hp in any way, but it will create higher drive pressures at the same boost pressure than a larger diameter would.

now for some totally anecdotal evidence...

I was in a similar spot as you this time last year, except for coming from the other direction. I was going to use 2.5 O.D schedule 10 stainless weld els and a standard 69mm gt45. After some reading I realized I didnt want to make myself an outlier in case I had problems. For my first scratch turbo build, I want the same cookie-cutter build as everyone else so I could get help diagnosing and troubleshooting.

So with the hot side partially built I scrapped it and went to 2.25 .065" exhaust tubing. I still want to try using SS weld els since they hold heat much better than thinwall tubing.

That wastegate placement might not be ideal and I can't really explain why. In school we learned that hot gasses very rapidly equalize pressure in a given space, but I guess that doesn't apply to exhaust since there are pulses? I'd put the gate(s) as close to the turbo as possible.
Old 11-24-2016, 09:33 AM
  #18  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Boostedbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 71
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nathaninwa
I had these same questions about a year ago when I turbod my stuff You can read night and day on the subject. I ended up with 2.25 od tubing as recommended by my camshaft guy in the end. We had a great talk about header design in turbo applications, and how cams affect both intake and final exhaust decisions

With that said, do yourself a favor and weld in an 1/8 inch pipe port and buy the 25.00 eBay 100psi sensor. Even if you can't log it, you can still monitor voltage and convert it to pressure in the system
yes, I will definetely monitor back pressure. However if I just wait a couple weeks I can order another batch of parts... as much as I want to start making the hotside I think it would be wise to just go with the tried and true 16ga 2.25od pipe like all of you have suggested.
Old 11-24-2016, 09:38 AM
  #19  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Boostedbrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 71
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by truckdoug

That wastegate placement might not be ideal and I can't really explain why. In school we learned that hot gasses very rapidly equalize pressure in a given space, but I guess that doesn't apply to exhaust since there are pulses? I'd put the gate(s) as close to the turbo as possible.
yeah you don't see to many people running the wastegates right off the manifold outlet.. I was always under the assumption that exhaust gas will take the least resistance path and if I were to angle the wastegates nicely on the manifolds my idea would work....but that's why I'm here asking questions. think I'm just going to do what everyone else has done and maybe just run a single 60mm wastegate right before the turbo inlet, and use the tried and true 2.25" O.D. pipe, coated and wrapped of course. that way I can potentially upgrade later on and get her up to the 800whp range without having to redo the whole hotside.
Old 11-24-2016, 09:49 AM
  #20  
TECH Regular
 
Nathaninwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm running a T6 twin scroll. 2.25 tubing fits nicely into each scroll. I'm running 44mm gates on each bank about 10 inches in front of the turbo flange. I have ran 4psi Wastegate pressure with no issues before. Still need to measure back pressure, but the turbine is the ultimate restriction in the system

I've been 168mph in a 2750lb car, puts it close to 1100whp, and I'll tell you what, spool time is not really an issue on the street


Quick Reply: 2" piping too small?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 PM.