Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

7665 or 7675 Turbo for my build?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2017, 08:46 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
CAMAROZ28AQUINO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Bay, Ontario
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 7665 or 7675 Turbo for my build?

Hey guys,

Need some advice.

Building a fun street car. The car will not see the track and what I am looking for is a nasty fun quick spool on street tires. Looking for 550+ WHP

- 1969 Chevelle
- Stock 5.3 with LS9 Headgaskets
- Tick Turbo Stage 2 Cam (219/223 | .617"/.595" | LSA114+3)
- T56

Which turbo do you reccomend for me?

I was looking at the On3 Ceramic Ball Bearing 7665 turbo but also started doing some research on the PT7675 turbo.

Not sure whats going to be better for me
Old 03-23-2017, 09:07 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

This will be absolute heresy on this forum, but I would suggest stepping down to a 67mm compressor and the same or smaller turbine. You probably won't get it much past the 550rwhp you speak of, but spool times would be fun, to say the least. Something like a 7675 would take you far beyond the power you are asking for at the expense of longer spool time. For race cars, and especially the high stalled autos that most are running down the 1/4 strip in this forum, I would be giving exactly the opposite advice.
Old 03-23-2017, 09:37 PM
  #3  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Modchevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 288
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gametech
This will be absolute heresy on this forum, but I would suggest stepping down to a 67mm compressor and the same or smaller turbine. You probably won't get it much past the 550rwhp you speak of, but spool times would be fun, to say the least. Something like a 7675 would take you far beyond the power you are asking for at the expense of longer spool time. For race cars, and especially the high stalled autos that most are running down the 1/4 strip in this forum, I would be giving exactly the opposite advice.
Are you serious?
Old 03-23-2017, 11:51 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
3 window's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,051
Received 185 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

I remember recently reading a thread about the 7665 turbo and the general consensus was that it's the most stupid turbo ever made. Horrible combination of compressor/turbine. The 7675 is very close to my borg 475 and it spools quickly. And that's with a 1.25 AR housing. I'd go 7675 out of the two you mentioned.
Old 03-24-2017, 03:28 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
w94rx7tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I ran precision 67mm when I had my RX7. The turbo spooled really fast and made the power. We made 659hp /680tq on a dyno dynamics at 15lbs. The turbo was plenty for the street and still had a little room left in it.
Old 03-24-2017, 04:13 PM
  #6  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

7665 does very well on a 4.8 or as twins on a 6.0.
Anything else, and its just a bad turbo.
Old 03-24-2017, 07:09 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
CAMAROZ28AQUINO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Bay, Ontario
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am torn on what to do. On3 did suggest a 6765 turbo for me as well as mentioned by gametech but I am still torn. So many options and opinions.

Has anyone else run a 6765 on a 5.3 ?
Old 03-24-2017, 07:36 PM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Modchevelle
Are you serious?
Do you honestly not think a 6765 would fit the criteria the OP stated perfectly? Also, is it not true that a 7675 would be larger than he needs for the stated goal, thereby needlessly increasing spool time?
Old 03-24-2017, 07:47 PM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Modchevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 288
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gametech
Do you honestly not think a 6765 would fit the criteria the OP stated perfectly? Also, is it not true that a 7675 would be larger than he needs for the stated goal, thereby needlessly increasing spool time?
My son has a 5.3 with a smaller cam than that (Z06) with a BW S475 T6..Yes T6 and it spools fast and it is on low boost right now...We didnt even turn it up yet. I guess it depends what your goals are and my gt45 68mm was a slower spool than my kids bigger turbo. Stated goals are one thing but run low boost and you can always bump it up when you get bored with your original stated goal.
Old 03-24-2017, 07:56 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Modchevelle
My son has a 5.3 with a smaller cam than that (Z06) with a BW S475 T6..Yes T6 and it spools fast and it is on low boost right now...We didnt even turn it up yet. I guess it depends what your goals are and my gt45 68mm was a slower spool than my kids bigger turbo. Stated goals are one thing but run low boost and you can always bump it up when you get bored with your original stated goal.
I was paying more attention to the t56 in the OP's post, and less attention to the 69 chevelle. I didn't even consider one of the Borg turbos as a street only recommendation, simply because I usually consider packaging, and that big turbine has to fit somewhere. That being said, an s475 would be way overkill, but one of its smaller brothers might be a good consideration.
Old 03-24-2017, 08:19 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sbcgenII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort hood
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

76/75
Old 03-24-2017, 08:22 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sutherlin OR
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

FWIW, I have a "little" BW S366 on a 5.3 in my 69 c10 and on 9lbs, It's a blast to drive! Near instant spool and I'd guess around 500hp but I think it still has legs. All stock 03 5.3 motor with only an Isky 215/215 112 cam n BTR springs.
Old 03-24-2017, 08:29 PM
  #13  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Modchevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 288
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gametech
I was paying more attention to the t56 in the OP's post, and less attention to the 69 chevelle. I didn't even consider one of the Borg turbos as a street only recommendation, simply because I usually consider packaging, and that big turbine has to fit somewhere. That being said, an s475 would be way overkill, but one of its smaller brothers might be a good consideration.
Problem is there is many turbos that can fill his needs but once you get a taste of turbos..you just want more. Im just putting that out on the table for him.We have 2 68 chevelles that is why im posting on this thread.Granted the 475 is a big boy in size and fun to install without cutting the car up. Here is my kids car..I call him a kid still..he is 34 married with children just to give OP a idea what a BW 475 in a chevelle fits.
Old 03-24-2017, 08:51 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sutherlin OR
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Modchevelle
Problem is there is many turbos that can fill his needs but once you get a taste of turbos..you just want more. Im just putting that out on the table for him.We have 2 68 chevelles that is why im posting on this thread.Granted the 475 is a big boy in size and fun to install without cutting the car up. Here is my kids car..I call him a kid still..he is 34 married with children just to give OP a idea what a BW 475 in a chevelle fits.
With the right turbo manifold, a t4 and a t6 isn't too hard to get in a Chevelle.
Old 03-24-2017, 09:31 PM
  #15  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
02sleeperz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: homeless
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sbcgenII
76/75
This...
Old 03-24-2017, 11:05 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kbracing96
With the right turbo manifold, a t4 and a t6 isn't too hard to get in a Chevelle.
With that much space in the engine bay, you just hope your T6 Borg doesn't get too lonely. Seriously, though, your s366 idea sounds like just the thing for the OP.
Old 03-24-2017, 11:22 PM
  #17  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Modchevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 288
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gametech
With that much space in the engine bay, you just hope your T6 Borg doesn't get too lonely. Seriously, though, your s366 idea sounds like just the thing for the OP.
Lol Lonely and how much is a 366 vs a 475? The 366 can produce some power but then again it all depends on the op wallet too. That is where the truth comes out !! Lol
Old 03-25-2017, 10:54 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sutherlin OR
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by gametech
With that much space in the engine bay, you just hope your T6 Borg doesn't get too lonely. Seriously, though, your s366 idea sounds like just the thing for the OP.
I really like it in my truck! We'll see just what kinda power it's making in a few weeks but it sounds amazing! lol Probably the coolest whistle of any turbo I've ran.

Originally Posted by Modchevelle
Lol Lonely and how much is a 366 vs a 475? The 366 can produce some power but then again it all depends on the op wallet too. That is where the truth comes out !! Lol
They are pretty close to the same money if you get a T6 S475. The T4's run a couple hundred more.
Old 03-25-2017, 11:13 AM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
sweet99ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plains Ks
Posts: 1,907
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

My T-7875 seems to spool as fast as my TC78-68. If you really think you won't ever want more then 550 hp then go with what spools fast, but like always we end up wanting more power lol.
Old 03-25-2017, 11:23 AM
  #20  
Launching!
 
6D9 Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Owensboro, KY
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL I had a feeling before I opened this thread that the comments were going to turn towards a BW, and for good reason.


Quick Reply: 7665 or 7675 Turbo for my build?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.