Ken's STS/Cartek GTO running 10.68@122MPH
03-29-2005, 10:02 AM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ken's STS/Cartek GTO running 10.68@129.81MPH Here is Ken's 10.68 @ 129.81 video run. I love the side view videos so much better: Video here:
The Car is running Cartek's heads, turbo cam, dished forged pistons, stock CID, tuning, STS kit with the 67 turbo running on pump gas and methanol injection
The Car is running Cartek's heads, turbo cam, dished forged pistons, stock CID, tuning, STS kit with the 67 turbo running on pump gas and methanol injection
Last edited by bradyb; 03-29-2005 at 10:23 AM.
Trending Topics
03-29-2005, 02:53 PM
#8
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RealQuick
When slowhawk gets behind the wheel!! 
03-29-2005, 03:00 PM
#9
Originally Posted by PurEvl
why would don get behind the wheel? Hes drivin my car once at the track when it was supercharged and that was to test the a/f and **** points
Just kidding...I dont want to get powerbombed next time i see you. 
03-29-2005, 04:28 PM
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
What gas? That has to be one of the most impressive examples of an STS setup.
03-29-2005, 04:39 PM
#12
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 6,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the mods were listed in another thread, no mention of meth, i believe its straight pump gas at 13 psi if i'm not mistaken.
They're going for 9's now, that shouldn't be too far off from now.
They're going for 9's now, that shouldn't be too far off from now.
03-29-2005, 07:10 PM
#15
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bradyb
Here is Ken's 10.68 @ 129.81 video run. I love the side view videos so much better: Video here:
The Car is running Cartek's heads, turbo cam, dished forged pistons, stock CID, tuning, STS kit with the 67 turbo running on pump gas and methanol injection
The Car is running Cartek's heads, turbo cam, dished forged pistons, stock CID, tuning, STS kit with the 67 turbo running on pump gas and methanol injection
Any idea on the race weight.
Dave
03-29-2005, 09:37 PM
#19
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rockland County, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PurEvl
brents STOCK MOTOR STOCK HEADED sts at 9 psi beat that car already. If brents goes to atco it will go 10.5 as well. Just info
Ps STS still sucks
Ps STS still sucks
Brent's car has raced at Atco as well. Last time I checked it did not go 10.6@129
Let's get realistic. They are BOTH extremely impressive in their own right, so lets not just try to constantly make one car try to sound "better" than the other. I'd be willing to bet that both owners of these cars don't appreciate the way a bunch of people have been trying to compare them.
P.S. who the hell cares if one car had skinnies. Like it's gonna make much of a difference when the damn cars weigh like 4000 pounds LOL
Last edited by Phil99TA; 03-29-2005 at 09:43 PM.
03-29-2005, 09:47 PM
#20
Originally Posted by Phil99TA
Let's get realistic. They are BOTH extremely impressive in their own right, so lets not just try to constantly make one car try to sound "better" than the other. I'd be willing to bet that both owners of these cars don't appreciate the way a bunch of people have been trying to compare them.
Originally Posted by Phil99TA
P.S. who the hell cares if one car had skinnies. Like it's gonna make much of a difference when the damn cars weigh like 4000 pounds LOL
