STS not making any HP :(
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STS not making any HP :(
I installed an STS system on my 05 GTO a couple of weeks ago. Had a base tune made last Tuesday. The car seems to run strong, but no where near the 500+ RWHP I was hoping for.
I had it dyno'd today (Sunday) and found it only made 418 RWHP (it made 348 with a cat back and NO tune)I also found it would only make 4 lbs of boost on the dyno, and peak power was at like 4000rpm . I have a .60 bar spring in the wastegate, so it should make around 7lbs at the throttle body. On the street, it will spike to mid 5's for boost, but fall off quickly.
We checked for leaks, but did not find anything worth mentioning. I did find that the blow off is not working at all though
Any ideas? For reference, this the is the intercooled system with .67 turbo, it has 1.85 rocker arms, a bigger walbro fuel pump, a Kenne Bell BAP, 60 lb injectors, and no cats. We are getting zero knock, and the A/F looked good as well.
Something else..the car has so much crankcase vacuum at idle, is whistles if I have the oil cap tight. Is this normal? I mean it really sucks hard.
Thanks in advance,
I had it dyno'd today (Sunday) and found it only made 418 RWHP (it made 348 with a cat back and NO tune)I also found it would only make 4 lbs of boost on the dyno, and peak power was at like 4000rpm . I have a .60 bar spring in the wastegate, so it should make around 7lbs at the throttle body. On the street, it will spike to mid 5's for boost, but fall off quickly.
We checked for leaks, but did not find anything worth mentioning. I did find that the blow off is not working at all though
Any ideas? For reference, this the is the intercooled system with .67 turbo, it has 1.85 rocker arms, a bigger walbro fuel pump, a Kenne Bell BAP, 60 lb injectors, and no cats. We are getting zero knock, and the A/F looked good as well.
Something else..the car has so much crankcase vacuum at idle, is whistles if I have the oil cap tight. Is this normal? I mean it really sucks hard.
Thanks in advance,
#2
I installed an STS system on my 05 GTO a couple of weeks ago. Had a base tune made last Tuesday.
I hope you were not going wide open throttle prior to having the car tuned? Bob
I hope you were not going wide open throttle prior to having the car tuned? Bob
#3
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: valley village, los angeles
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so I take it you dont have a boost controller right? I know after I did my intercooler I also made 4psi with the my boost controller set at 0. I was told I had to change the boost reference and that raised my base boost back up to 5psi.
#6
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
Originally Posted by ddnspider
If your peaking at 4k then that would bring valve float to mind,are the stock springs still in it?And Slowhawk is probably right about the PCV setup as well.check on both of those.
Trending Topics
#10
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RealQuick
Actually, 8.7psi to be exact....(14.5psi = 1 bar, multiplied by .6)
I figured it was loss due to plumbing, intercooler etc.
Tony
#11
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not using the stock springs. I have a new set of Comp 918 springs installed. Do you think I'd see valve float with 918 springs?
I have the boost reference line going from the turbo, to the wastegate.
Tony
I have the boost reference line going from the turbo, to the wastegate.
Tony
#17
Sorry to hear you are having issues. Mine didn't make but 5.5psi on the dyno [on low boost] making ~450-460 rwhp. I get a solid 7 psi on the road. What is even more weird is that I added 5psi on the dyno [via the 0-5psi controller] and promptly made 15psi!!! That was a tad scary, but no damage was done.
I still don't like the idea of boost reference lines running the length of the car [despite some folks finding it works well]. Boost psi is not really as significant as we want to think, but is simply another 'measure' at the engine. Having the wastegate open based on what happens at the turbo outlet is fine...we simply are going to see some losses in the intake manifold.
Not much to add to the discussion, however!
I still don't like the idea of boost reference lines running the length of the car [despite some folks finding it works well]. Boost psi is not really as significant as we want to think, but is simply another 'measure' at the engine. Having the wastegate open based on what happens at the turbo outlet is fine...we simply are going to see some losses in the intake manifold.
Not much to add to the discussion, however!
#18
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Frisco TX (Dallas Area)
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boost at the TB is the boost the engine sees, slice it however you want. If you want to "lead the bird", go for it. I believe having a reliable ENGINE boost reference (i.e. at the intake manifold) is best. I think you will too. Try it and see. HTH
#19
Restricted User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
another vote for boost reference to the manifold....no reason for it not to be making more boost and/or power with everything mentioned above... anyways good luck and hope u find whats holding u back man