Who has dyno testing comparisons of the Victor Jr intake vs LS6 style intake?
#1
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: HOUSTON-TX
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who has dyno testing comparisons of the Victor Jr intake vs LS6 style intake?
I would like to see some graphs posted. PureEvl did the testing but never posted the results?
there is an interesting discussion going on, in the advanced section, but I am interested in the FI results, who cares about NA
there is an interesting discussion going on, in the advanced section, but I am interested in the FI results, who cares about NA
#5
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
A few FI experts basically told me that my Edelbrock single plane will perform as well as my Beck sheetmetal intake, but that the Edelbrock intake should have slightly better AF's across all the cylinders, ie. the back cylinders won't be leaner than the fronts.
#7
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
Originally Posted by engineermike
Why is it hard with a turbo setup???
From what I've seen personally from it is that we can run a good amount of boost without KR and the plugs are reading even know unlike the rear cylinders leaner than the rest with the LS6 intake.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
Turbo's (well atleast our's) get's the reference of the manifold.If the restriction changes the boost stay's the same. A supercharger will probly show boost changes which a power curve will follow.
1. Not help at all.
2. Make more power at lower boost (pump gas) but not max boost.
3. Make more power at all boost levels.
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
A few FI experts basically told me that my Edelbrock single plane will perform as well as my Beck sheetmetal intake, but that the Edelbrock intake should have slightly better AF's across all the cylinders, ie. the back cylinders won't be leaner than the fronts.