Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Will my new cam work for turbo???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2006, 11:34 PM
  #1  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Will my new cam work for turbo???

I bought a brand new cam for an N/A heads and cam package and now have decided to go turbo.

My buddy got good numbers out of a reverse split so I am wondering if mine will work. It is:

228/232 588-595 114+2 LSA


Please help, thanks.
Old 08-06-2006, 02:41 AM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Best - maybe not. Will it work? - yes, and probably quite well.
Old 08-06-2006, 05:06 AM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (38)
 
Mr_president's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hmmm i like it!!
Old 08-06-2006, 09:00 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

It will be fine. I have a 224/236-114 cam in my turbo LT1 and it runs pretty well. I've pulled 143 mph in the quarter with no weight reduction in 95 deg heat. The exhaust lobe isn't as critical as most people think.
Old 08-06-2006, 11:01 AM
  #5  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Thanks so far. Would I be able to buy a cam that aids spooling time compared to this one...or make better power? I am not sure how cam specs afftect turbos.


The cam I have is a brand new AFR custom grind so I could imagine I could sell it pretty easy.
Old 08-13-2006, 09:59 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

UPDATE:

I am still concerned (as is my mechanic) that we are leaving HP on the table using this cam. He thinks the High duration and midrange LSA will provide too much overlap and blow through.

Should I suck it up and order a custom grind? I was thinking a reverse split with lower duration (high 2teens, low 220s) and a 115 or higher lsa. It sure would be nice to have a turbo car with a lumpy cam though
Old 08-13-2006, 10:11 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
black_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think its a little too heavy on the exhaust duration. How high are you spinning hte motor?
Old 08-13-2006, 10:18 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by black_z
I think its a little too heavy on the exhaust duration. How high are you spinning hte motor?


Depends were my cam (which ever I go with) stops making power, lol. I will be using out of the box Patriot stg 3 LQ9 heads though. I would like to keep it under 6600 rpms.
Old 08-13-2006, 10:32 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
cjg454ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wiould this cam be any good?

comp cam 236/242 .598/.610 114+4
Old 08-13-2006, 10:39 PM
  #10  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cjg454ss
wiould this cam be any good?

comp cam 236/242 .598/.610 114+4
Hella jacking my thread
Old 08-13-2006, 11:33 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
trtturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newark, Tx.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

we have used a 224/230 112 cam and had damn good results. I say go for it.
Old 08-14-2006, 09:57 AM
  #12  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trtturbo
we have used a 224/230 112 cam and had damn good results. I say go for it.
That sounds a little more promising. What do you mean "good results"?
Old 08-14-2006, 10:17 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
 
bowtieman81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland/Illinois
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is your setup? Seems the general consensus is to run a little more intake duration than exhaust, depending on setup.
Old 08-14-2006, 10:28 AM
  #14  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,653
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

Power goal?

Big cams like that might be all top end power, and the midrange and torque might not be as strong as with a smaller cam.
Old 08-14-2006, 10:53 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
 
NassyVette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by bowtieman81
What is your setup? Seems the general consensus is to run a little more intake duration than exhaust, depending on setup.
Ditto. I remember seeing somewhere that truck manifolds like 6 degrees between intake/exhaust in a reverse split with a tight LSA (ie. 226/220 115/116). Better flowing headers like less of split or standard split (226/224 or 224/224 etc).
Old 08-14-2006, 11:48 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
 
bowtieman81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland/Illinois
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NassyVette
Ditto. I remember seeing somewhere that truck manifolds like 6 degrees between intake/exhaust in a reverse split with a tight LSA (ie. 226/220 115/116). Better flowing headers like less of split or standard split (226/224 or 224/224 etc).

Yep, that is what I have gathered in talking with members and sponsors about turbo cams. That type of cam should give good low-mid range power while still turning out a good top end. Exactly what I would want in a street car.
Old 08-14-2006, 06:28 PM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (38)
 
Mr_president's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bowtieman81
Yep, that is what I have gathered in talking with members and sponsors about turbo cams. That type of cam should give good low-mid range power while still turning out a good top end. Exactly what I would want in a street car.

agreeeeeeeeeeed~! stick with that cam and try it i think it will be differnt see what it does! you can always turn the boost up
Old 08-14-2006, 06:38 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
67Firebird455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 2,525
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I think it'll run great. If you had a cam with a RIDICULOUS amount of valve overlap then I would have to vote against it. The fact that there isn't a giant split, and you still have a reasonable LSA, I would say run it...
Old 08-14-2006, 06:42 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Got Me SOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 6,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this is good news I run a 224/230 .581/.588 on a 115, I am possibly considering going turbo next year. I dont know.
Old 08-14-2006, 06:46 PM
  #20  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

your current cam might make it easier to run big numbers on pump gas as some of the "blow thru" will be in the midrange where cylinder pressure is high (around full spool up and peak tq). If pump gas is not a concern then maybe something is better.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.