look at this cam.....give input
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
look at this cam.....give input
i am going with a .030 6.0 liter set up. weisco turbo pistons, scat rods, ported heads and victor jr efi intake,90mm accufab tb. 1 3/4 forward facing headers i made and a 74mm turbo from hose at forced induction. and a after cooler.
here is the cam specs.
hydrolic roller
intake at .050, 230
centerline112
valve lift.595
exhaust at .o50,226
centerline120
valve lift.573
lobe seperation 116.
here is the cam specs.
hydrolic roller
intake at .050, 230
centerline112
valve lift.595
exhaust at .o50,226
centerline120
valve lift.573
lobe seperation 116.
#2
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I too would like to know what others have to say. I've asked in many different posts about turbo cams and it seems that no one really has a handle on them. They either preach reverse splits, or say reverse splits are over rated and only needed in a restricted exhaust setup. Lsa seems to vary also. I even changed my cam of choice from a 224/228 @ 114 to a 227/224 .569/.563 114 LSA only because I had more input for the reverse splits. It definatley comes down to the entire setup but then again no one was really any help there either. I say every cam is a turbo cam. Some will work better than other's and good luck figuring out which one that will be.
Last edited by Bird-Of-Prey; 08-31-2006 at 07:52 PM.
#3
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
In about 2-4 weeks I will have results of my 228-232 588/595 @114+2 xer lobe cam with a t76gts running on a tial 44mm WG w/ a 0.6 bar spring.
My buddy has a similar turbo build with GREAT results with his reverse split cam. It is much smaller in duration and lift than yours though.
My buddy has a similar turbo build with GREAT results with his reverse split cam. It is much smaller in duration and lift than yours though.
#4
Originally Posted by ou812/z28
here is the cam specs.
hydrolic roller
intake at .050, 230
centerline112
valve lift.595
exhaust at .o50,226
centerline120
valve lift.573
lobe seperation 116.
hydrolic roller
intake at .050, 230
centerline112
valve lift.595
exhaust at .o50,226
centerline120
valve lift.573
lobe seperation 116.
Mike
#7
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by engineermike
Who spec'd that out? I know that INTMD8 had one similar and it went in the trash cam. I think his was 227/218-117. He said it was soggy down low and didn't do very well up top. He later switched to a 224/224-113 and gained low-end response plus significant horsepower.
Mike
Mike