Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

S95/PT96mm crossover pipe sizing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2007, 07:13 PM
  #1  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default S95/PT96mm crossover pipe sizing

We're making 1 3/4" headers and using a 5" down pipe as far back as we can and downsizing to 4". What size pipe should you run between the turbo and the 1 3/4" header tubes? 3" or 2.5"?
Phil
Old 01-08-2007, 07:55 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

im in the middle of a fab too. and was going to use my old 2 1/4 piping for my t91, but not sure if it is big enough. i maxed out my old pt88 at 22-24 psi. On the new set-up its a t91 and the same size motor "383" as before.....so i dont see that it will matter much if it is bigger.....but i would like to know if i need to go bigger too.

Last edited by otherwhitemeat; 01-08-2007 at 09:26 PM.
Old 01-08-2007, 09:01 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would do 2.5 inch pipes. Thats what I use on all my setups. I have used 2.5 inch pipes in several builds that made over 1000hp.
Old 01-08-2007, 09:07 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

would going smaller affect spool time or power, or both? i plan to use all of this 1600hp turbo too!
Old 01-08-2007, 09:11 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I would think going to a 3 inch intermediate would slow spool time down, but not affect power.
Old 01-08-2007, 09:17 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

takes what i was thinking.... because the turbo itself is back pressure anyway. anyone elso with some info?
Old 01-08-2007, 09:22 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (43)
 
TwnTrboCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

We use 2.5" on our stuff.
Old 01-08-2007, 09:30 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Mike, good to know for us sub 1000hp guys. I dont guess you could use a 1" pipe cause it would choke like Ohio State University I had to do it
Old 01-08-2007, 09:37 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (25)
 
1fstTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

use 2.5 your spool time will definitely be slower with the 3ich.
Old 01-08-2007, 09:40 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 1fstTA
use 2.5 your spool time will definitely be slower with the 3ich.
would i loose power using a 2.25? or anything significant anyways?
Old 01-08-2007, 09:45 PM
  #11  
6 Second Club Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Phil99vette
We're making 1 3/4" headers and using a 5" down pipe as far back as we can and downsizing to 4". What size pipe should you run between the turbo and the 1 3/4" header tubes? 3" or 2.5"?
Phil

Is this a race car with the 1 3/4 headers? Spool time?
Old 01-08-2007, 11:24 PM
  #12  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

We use 2.5", and we have made 1500rwhp with 1 5/8" primaries.
Old 01-09-2007, 12:14 AM
  #13  
FormerVendor
 
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
we have made 1500rwhp with 1 5/8" primaries.
It's always hard convincing people of that.
Old 01-09-2007, 12:58 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
 
eviltwins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1fstTA
use 2.5 your spool time will definitely be slower with the 3ich.
"My 302 motor makes 1177 RWHP and 1097 RWTQ and that is with 1 5/8" headers, 3" crossover and a 4" DP thru a "FULL" exhaust system inlcuding tailpipes. This is with a 88mm turbo at 32 psi of boost. I too was told go with a 2.5" crossover too but I opted to go with 3" instead so I can't give you any data with a 2.5" but with the 3", I wanted to have as less exhaust backpressures as possible. I am sure that you will have a 350+ cubed motor and I'd go with 3" but that is just my opinion. I may make up a 2.5" so that I could see the difference between the two sizes."

That's from Brent Davis on turbomustangs.com. He claims to make full boost on the street at around 4000 RPM's with a 306" motor and a Majestic T4-frame 88mm turbo. I really don't think a 3" crossover will hurt you at all, I did a friends car with a 284" modular with a 3" crossover and a GT47-88 and it doesn't seem abnormally slow to spool.
Old 01-09-2007, 10:10 AM
  #15  
6 Second Club Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
LASTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
We use 2.5", and we have made 1500rwhp with 1 5/8" primaries.

Yea, that's why I was asking why he was going with 1 3/4. Jim used 1 5/8 on mine and it seems to be working well.
Old 01-11-2007, 02:28 AM
  #16  
Staging Lane
 
Dustin11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In the garage
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Small block Chevy

1 7/8 header with 2.5 crossover...2000hp

My own 23* motor made 1500hp with 1 5/8 and 2.5 crossover

Why go bigger. You still have to neck that pipe down into a merge at the flange
Old 01-11-2007, 03:22 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Why go bigger. You still have to neck that pipe down into a merge at the flange[/QUOTE]


thats what im saying




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.