Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

408 w/ twin 67's or single 80?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2007, 07:23 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
valsperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Round Lake Heights, IL
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 408 w/ twin 67's or single 80?

I have 2 garrett 67mm journal bearing turbo's or one dual ball bearing 80mm at the shop. I would like to run around 15psi. Any input? They are going to be rear mount.
Old 03-20-2007, 07:36 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
99Z28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

there are some people running a bigger turbo without that big of a motor so i would day run an 88 or something........ but you dont have that so i would "think" that the twin 67's would work better
Old 03-20-2007, 08:00 AM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
valsperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Round Lake Heights, IL
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea, I believe that the twins put me smack in the middle of the compressor map. That is if you are supposed to 1/2 the air flow for twins? It's just the extra cost involved and the single is already set up on the truck.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:24 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

what 80mm is it
T6 flange?
what AR
if the AR is small or a T4 flange go with the twins
Old 03-20-2007, 08:29 AM
  #5  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would go S85 or S88, but that is me. They are compact in size compared to the thumpers and GT47/55 units and will easily support a 408.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:44 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Go with the T80 T4 since its rearmount setup. Even with the cubes, you will have the normal lag of rearmounts, but the cubes will help. If the T80 is a restriction, then you can upgrade to a T88 T4 turbo.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:48 AM
  #7  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
valsperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Round Lake Heights, IL
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Because it is a rear mount and I mean way back there, I was thinking that the 80 would spool better also. It is an ITS 80mm dual ballbearing with a .96 A/R housing. I think the twin 67's will definately work better through the whole range. Does anyone know if you 1/2 the airflow when reading the compressor maps when setting up twins?
Old 03-20-2007, 08:50 AM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by valsperformance
Does anyone know if you 1/2 the airflow when reading the compressor maps when setting up twins?
Yes you do. Think about it this way, only 4 cylinders are feeding the each turbo. So halve your airflow consumption to spec each turbo.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:57 AM
  #9  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
valsperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Round Lake Heights, IL
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I figured but wasn't positive. Thanks....
Old 03-20-2007, 10:51 AM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by valsperformance
It is an ITS 80mm dual ballbearing with a .96 A/R housing.
I can offer you a little insite on it since I have a 370 and run an ITS DBB T76. Does your setup have the R,X, or Q trim turbine, hopefully the R.

I've found that for my setup the .81 a/r works the best for spool and drivability. I have a .84 housing for an R trim I can sell cheap if you would like to try that as well in your application. My setup doesn't spool quite as fast as I would like but it gets the job done. Honestly if it spooled faster I'd never get any traction on the street, it still comes loose on me from a highway roll (70 mph) pretty often, even on nitto drag radials.

I'd say the single 80mm is going to be your best option. The twin 67's would probably spool considerably slower. Their major downside would be if you ran dual exhaust. Dual exhaust = a lot more surface area to lose heat from vs a single pipe. Dual 2.5" pipes vs a single 3" pipe would have over 1.5x the surface area to lose heat from.
Old 03-20-2007, 01:28 PM
  #11  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
valsperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Round Lake Heights, IL
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Excellent point on heat loss. I didn't even think of that. The 80mm is actually a 72 now and would be sent to them for an upgrade. Justin at ITS recommended there new wheel which I think he called an XR trim or something like that. I just keep looking at the maps and the 80 is a little smal for airflow. The twin 67's are in the sweet spot. Do you think the 80 can make 900hp at the crank?
Old 03-20-2007, 01:37 PM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (13)
 
Navy David SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 4,647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You need to front mount them. Twin-67's are great on a well built 408, with the right heads and cam.

Here's a picture of my twins on my 408 iron block. On 14lbs blew the tires off at 890rwhp . Figure with 18lb will be easy 1k rwhp. There's a lot more pictures on my car's site in signature.



David
Old 03-20-2007, 02:16 PM
  #13  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
valsperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Round Lake Heights, IL
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice, did you vent the crankcase with that one breather? That is another issue that I was working through with this set up.
Old 03-20-2007, 03:14 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by valsperformance
Excellent point on heat loss. I didn't even think of that. The 80mm is actually a 72 now and would be sent to them for an upgrade. Justin at ITS recommended there new wheel which I think he called an XR trim or something like that. I just keep looking at the maps and the 80 is a little smal for airflow. The twin 67's are in the sweet spot. Do you think the 80 can make 900hp at the crank?
X trim is a R trim that has been back cut to reduce the exducer is what Jose told me, less flow.

Another option you should consider is selling your current turbo and getting something custom from forcedinductions.com. I know when I talked to Jose last he said there were some new things they were doing with the new extended tip wheels and newer turbine wheel designs.

I'd say 67s in the back, bad idea. 67's in the front, good idea if you can make the sacrifices required to fit them. Turbo's will always work better when they are closer to their energy source.
Old 03-20-2007, 03:51 PM
  #15  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
valsperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Round Lake Heights, IL
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I could move everything up front but this year I am commited money wise to keeping it in the rear. The 80 will work great but I know it will run a little short on the top end. I guess I'll just keep my original plan with the 80 this year and consider the two 67's up front next year.
Old 03-20-2007, 04:40 PM
  #16  
STP
Staging Lane
 
STP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have a 408 with twin 67 dbb front mount made 870 at 12 lbs drives nice on the street 18 lbs made 1060
Old 03-20-2007, 10:01 PM
  #17  
12 Second Club
 
HitmanLSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by STP
i have a 408 with twin 67 dbb front mount made 870 at 12 lbs drives nice on the street 18 lbs made 1060
What octane on the 12lbs? and is that Water I/C or air air?
Old 03-20-2007, 10:08 PM
  #18  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,653
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

val what kind of car?
Old 03-20-2007, 10:31 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (13)
 
Navy David SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 4,647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by valsperformance
Very nice, did you vent the crankcase with that one breather? That is another issue that I was working through with this set up.
The pictures doesn't show 100% as the car sits today. Had to add another vent tank for the driver's side also. So 2 tanks one for each valve cover.

David
Old 03-21-2007, 08:03 AM
  #20  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
valsperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Round Lake Heights, IL
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The set up is in an 03 Escalade EXT. 6200lbs with me in it. 408 stroker, 4l80E conversion w/ SS silverado t-case, stage III Ls6 heads, custom Vals turbo cam, lowered for better weight distribution, and alot more. The truck ran 3.3 0-60 times on the street tires. We couldn't get her up to the track yet to get a 1/4 mile. All on the 72MM turbo that was on it before we decided to go all out in this thing. Very cool truck, should be finished with paint and all in a few months. At least for this season.


Quick Reply: 408 w/ twin 67's or single 80?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.