Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

When are the IATs to high for FI??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2007, 04:28 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
ABeasst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default When are the IATs to high for FI??

At what point should you start to worry about how high the IATs are? What range of IATs do you guys run in??
Old 04-20-2007, 05:10 PM
  #2  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great question.....hard to answer. Need more octane to "help" offset high AIT's. Combo related also....different combos will tolerate different temps. For me 170 was the cutoff, then I went to meth and dropped it down since the turbos were killing the IC's.
Old 04-20-2007, 06:25 PM
  #3  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

200 is what Jose considers max on a gas engine and 400 on a diesel.
Old 04-20-2007, 06:44 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
HUGGER ORANGE SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CO
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yes great question...

My IAT's jump up a good 70 deg above Amb temps with a good 10 second pull with 15psi of boost from my 3" twin intercoolers from ATI... These things hardly do anything at 700rwhp..

Now I have meth, I know it helps as I get no KR and the car runs smoother. No dyno numbers yet and dont know how much the meth helps with the IAT's as my sensor is before the meth spray..

Hope this help..

Clint
Old 04-20-2007, 09:03 PM
  #5  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,647
Received 1,090 Likes on 718 Posts

Default

Kurt @ W2W told me that IAT's over 150F trouble him.
Old 04-20-2007, 09:08 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I don't like anything over 150.

Meth fixes that though. I can see an initial temp drop of 60 degrees and always ends up below ambient. The hotter it is the better the meth cools.
Old 04-21-2007, 04:41 AM
  #7  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

Originally Posted by HUGGER ORANGE SS
Yes great question...

My IAT's jump up a good 70 deg above Amb temps with a good 10 second pull with 15psi of boost from my 3" twin intercoolers from ATI... These things hardly do anything at 700rwhp..

Now I have meth, I know it helps as I get no KR and the car runs smoother. No dyno numbers yet and dont know how much the meth helps with the IAT's as my sensor is before the meth spray..

Hope this help..

Clint
Clint, you should jump up to the thicker 4.5" intercoolers.

From an article that was in a GM Hi Tech magazine. Bob

"Ryan compiled the raw data into these convenient graphs and as you can see there was approximately .5 psi less of boost drop off from the larger intercoolers. In addition the larger intercoolers were 10 percent more effective in cooling the intake air temperature, especially in the upper rpm range.... "

"...At 6500 rpm intake air temperatures were only 62 degrees with the 4.5-inch intercoolers, meanwhile, with the smaller units, intake air was at 71 degrees. As you can see from the graph, as rpm and boost increased so did the disparity between the two intercoolers, proving the potential with higher boost levels."
Old 04-21-2007, 09:35 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

on my old turbotech street kit with the intercooler near the radiator my IATs got up to 200* on a 100* day, that bothered me, i would like to see them no higher then 170* on a very hot day, but would prefer the low 150 range at that ambient
Old 04-21-2007, 09:42 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

This may sound really stupid put how are you guys measuring your IAT's???
I am doing a 4inch thick OBX intercooler on a Open front Bumper pushing roughly 650-700RWHP on a D1SC (15lbs or so) and I am wondering what my IAT's would be?
Old 04-21-2007, 10:07 AM
  #10  
kp
8 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
kp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 10,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Logging the IAT sensor is a good start

Mine will get up to 150 on a 90 degree day at the end of the 1/4 with the 4" OBX and D1SC, thats the highest I have seen. Pretty much it will always rise 40-45 degrees on a pass, if I leave the line at 75 it will go to 115, 110 and it will go up to 150 etc. Thats acceptable to me.
Old 04-21-2007, 10:37 AM
  #11  
TECH Regular
 
xxxhp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I got this from my scanner log. Running my current setup (in sig), 12 psi and 10 seconds of WOT time would increase the IAT by 38F.

I would start to worry at 150+, and I would stop at 170
Old 04-21-2007, 12:13 PM
  #12  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ABeasst
At what point should you start to worry about how high the IATs are? What range of IATs do you guys run in??
Don't know if you have meth or not, but if you don't check out this post I made with screen shots of logs pre and post meth.... IATs below ambient after meth and 7 degrees of timing is night and day on an FI car.. https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....3&postcount=35
Old 04-21-2007, 12:18 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
HUGGER ORANGE SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CO
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
Clint, you should jump up to the thicker 4.5" intercoolers.

From an article that was in a GM Hi Tech magazine. Bob

"Ryan compiled the raw data into these convenient graphs and as you can see there was approximately .5 psi less of boost drop off from the larger intercoolers. In addition the larger intercoolers were 10 percent more effective in cooling the intake air temperature, especially in the upper rpm range.... "

"...At 6500 rpm intake air temperatures were only 62 degrees with the 4.5-inch intercoolers, meanwhile, with the smaller units, intake air was at 71 degrees. As you can see from the graph, as rpm and boost increased so did the disparity between the two intercoolers, proving the potential with higher boost levels."

Thx BOB... Naw I'm planning on just going to a Front Mount... I've seen you're kit, it's very nice, but I'm thinking I would like to to my own with a single inlet/Duel outlet for the intercooler so I can have the piping Y in just brfore the TB. Kinda like Imtimadat8 97 LT1 setup.. I think that would look great under my hood.. + a 10% better difference on the 4.5 intercoolers, just not good enough compared to a front mount..

CLint
Old 04-21-2007, 04:06 PM
  #14  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Schantin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post

Default

On "stock" tune the PCM will begin pulling timing as low as 100 degrees. I was seeing 130-135 on my STS at 5PSI before adding an intercooler. After the FMIC, the highest I've noted is 105. That was during some non-stop full boost runs over a period of 20 minutes.

I set the parameters on the PCM to aviod retarding timing until 110 degrees. High boost will create more heat, but even so I'd call anything above 130 a bad thing. Just my $0.02
Old 04-22-2007, 03:08 AM
  #15  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Tirefire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: El Paso, Tx
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Would a scanmaster be a good way to measure IAT's?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.