Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Looking for 2nd opinions.... Forced Induction camshaft selection...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2007, 03:58 PM
  #1  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (51)
 
Ron@Vengeance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Looking for 2nd opinions.... Forced Induction camshaft selection...

I had a customer in my shop last week with a ProCharged C5 Z06... Car made 577rwhp on another dyno in Atl with another tuner... This was with stock internals and stainless longtubes...

Car comes to me.. only changes are custom camshaft/boost a pump.. Camshaft is from another sponsor on here. Specs are 227/233 .650/.600 115LSA... Car made 501rwhp on our dyno.. Needless to say, the customer is extremely dissapointed with the final results....

Boost=5lbs with new camshaft
Air fuel=11.5:1
Timing=19* @ WOT

Any comments on this camshaft? I have my own opinion, but without voicing it, I would like to see what others have to say.....
Old 08-13-2007, 04:05 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (17)
 
2000TurboVert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ron.. From what I have read, the stock z06 cam seems to be a REALLY nice FI cam..

Alot of people in f-bodies are using the Z06 cam when they go FI!

Just from what research I have read!!!
Old 08-13-2007, 04:09 PM
  #3  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (51)
 
Ron@Vengeance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I agree This customer just wanted a slight performance increase with a lil lope....
Old 08-13-2007, 04:29 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
trey04gto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: OKC
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run a procharged setup and a very moderate cam 224/232 .581/.595 114LSA
Cam has worked excellent and has a good lope!!
The above cam seems very strange to me .650/.600 seems wrong... should be reversed
Going from a 119LSA to a 115LSA should not bleed off that much boost
Old 08-13-2007, 04:35 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

ron what lift is the springs good to and how high is it being revved?
Old 08-13-2007, 04:36 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Websy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I agree I was going to go with a comp 224/228 .581/.588 114 LSA, I have talked to a guy who used this in stock cubes, big cubes, s/c and turbo applications and it worked well. I am going differenet route now, and it sits NIB in gargage. I am sure I won't have trouble getting rid of it though. Good luck!
Old 08-13-2007, 04:38 PM
  #7  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It could be weather and dyno variation alone, but you know the customer doesn't want to hear that.

I worked on a car Saturday that was ALSO a procharged Z06 exactly the way yours was before the cam (mods wise) that ALSO put down 575rwhp at the same amount of boost on a 50deg day. Saturday it was about 90 and the car was down to 530rwhp but with a 40ft/lb hit in tq and the mods are the same as they were on that cooler day. ALL of this is on the SAME DYNO WITH CORRECTION! Customer wanted to be aggressive with meth (he only really drives to race and runs hi octane fuel then) so we upped the meth, worked the fuel, and tossed about 3 degrees of timing on and got all of the 40ft/lbs of tq back from his previous high, but HP still settled in around 555. All of this was on a dynojet. I spoke with him later and asked him if it felt better now and he said OH YEAH.
Old 08-13-2007, 04:43 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
99.9percenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My (inexperienced) guess is valve float,or beltslip.
Old 08-13-2007, 05:08 PM
  #9  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I see a lot of variance around here from dyno to dyno.
Old 08-13-2007, 05:26 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
GR33N GoblinM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

ron you use a DynaPack 5000 right? My friend owns a DynaPack 5000 as well, and we dyno many many cars that have just come from a Dynojet ... and typically we see that most are showing a 4-5% loss on ours.. ask him what dyno he used and what conditions they did..(pre-loading the suspension and all that)..

BUT

considering you are asking a Cam question.. i think his exhaust duration and intake lift are killing his #'s.. but thats my un-educated guess..
Old 08-13-2007, 05:54 PM
  #11  
Closed Sponsor Account
iTrader: (3)
 
Josh@MASPORT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

our mustang dyno would easily read 501RWHP while on a dynojet it would be higher.

a quick example: one of our customers dynoed 470RWHP on a dyno jet and 400 on our mustang
Old 08-13-2007, 06:00 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
JAvenger007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ATL/Savannah Georgia
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That car originally made 577 on 5psi? Isn't that on the high side for a procharged LS6 with stock cam? 500rwhp sounds about right for that boost and that cam. Did he show you the 577 chart? How high did you spin the motor?
Old 08-13-2007, 07:45 PM
  #13  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Did you try more timing?If there is no boost leaks I would add timing to 21 degree's and see if power jumps alot.The Cam could be wrong,on a 112 duration or something that is bleeding boost.

Case in point -had a customer do a 228 on 112 Cam for NA.Year later he wanted a procharger but keep that cam.Ordered the ussual P1 with 4.0 pulley that ussually makes 8lbs of boost. Got the car on the dyno with the ussual SC tune and the car made the exact hp as before with a whopping 2lbs of boost. I ended up adding 8-10 degree's of timing against my judgement but it worked.Gained 140rwhp with just timing.So,140rwhp with 2lbs of boost
Old 08-13-2007, 07:48 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Amarillo,TX
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah 577 seems way to high for a stock LS6 with only 5psi unless this new cam lowered the boost which some do.That intake LSK lobe seems kinda pointless on that setup.
Old 08-13-2007, 08:23 PM
  #15  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
Case in point -had a customer do a 228 on 112 Cam for NA.Year later he wanted a procharger but keep that cam.Ordered the ussual P1 with 4.0 pulley that ussually makes 8lbs of boost. Got the car on the dyno with the ussual SC tune and the car made the exact hp as before with a whopping 2lbs of boost. I ended up adding 8-10 degree's of timing against my judgement but it worked.Gained 140rwhp with just timing.So,140rwhp with 2lbs of boost
WHOA! Crazy story.
Old 08-13-2007, 08:40 PM
  #16  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (51)
 
Ron@Vengeance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Couple of answers.....

-We use a DynoJet 224X

- Spinning the motor to 6800rpm

-Boost was in the 8 to 9lb range before. Car was previously dyno'd on a 224X local to our shop. Tuner is very questionable as far as fluffing the results.

- We ran 19 total, because on the street (Prior to the dyno) it knocked with anything more in it... It was 104* outside FWIW

Just looking for others opinions on this particular camshaft... We have NEVER used anything that big, with that much lift on such a small motor with boost before.

Thanx for all of the responses so far. Customer is putting in a MUCH smaller cam and coming back for more tuning. We will see what happens.
Old 08-13-2007, 09:02 PM
  #17  
TT-TECH Veteran
iTrader: (29)
 
Inspector12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pearland
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I don't think it is that big really I have used simular specs on my 346 with great results, but I wouldn't gauge it off of another dyno that is for sure.
Old 08-14-2007, 01:29 AM
  #18  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
BIG BAD BLACKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If thats too big of a cam whats my 370 with a D1 gonna do with this big EPP FI cam?

232/240-595/608-115 Thats a much bigger cam and has gotten good results, maybe its only good for higher boost applications? Im looking to max my D1 on this cam.
Old 08-14-2007, 12:22 PM
  #19  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Surely 650thou cant be right ??
Old 08-16-2007, 10:22 AM
  #20  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
eb02z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sure it's not just valve float with that 650 lift on the intake side? What spring is on it? 575-stock Z06 with 9 psi and headers is pretty common. On my Z06 I dropped down to 317 heads with a 222/228 cam on a 113 with a P1SC and made 600 rwhp at 9 psi and lower compression.


Quick Reply: Looking for 2nd opinions.... Forced Induction camshaft selection...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.