Turbo exhaust tube diameter questions??? - LS1TECH



Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Turbo exhaust tube diameter questions???

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-23-2007, 06:58 PM   #1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
TT LS2 1969 Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Oakland, CA
Posts: 50
Default Turbo exhaust tube diameter questions???

I have to fabricate headers for my twin-turbo LS1 and i need feedback about tubing sizes. i had planned on running 1 7/8" tubing, but was told that that small of a diameter would choke the engine. It was recommended for me to run at least 2 1/4" tubes to the merge collector. The engine will be force-fed by two Turbonetics 62-1's. Any help, advice, suggestions and or feedback would greatly be appreciated. Thanks all!
TT LS2 1969 Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 07:35 PM   #2
9 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
HUNTER02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kennesaw, Georgia
Posts: 2,797
Default

What kind of power you looking to make. I think you will be fine with the 1 7/8 pipe. I have truck manifold's and they are pretty small diameter also!
HUNTER02SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 10:52 PM   #3
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
TT LS2 1969 Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Oakland, CA
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HUNTER02SS View Post
What kind of power you looking to make. I think you will be fine with the 1 7/8 pipe. I have truck manifold's and they are pretty small diameter also!
Well hopefully, if all goes as planned, the engine will be in the 900-1000hp range. Looking to run a max of 18-20psi, it will be intercooled, yad, yada, yada...
TT LS2 1969 Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 10:59 PM   #4
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Default

I have done them with great sucsess in 1 5/8".
Josh@KY-Turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 11:19 PM   #5
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
W8N2SQZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 668
Default

I'm a little confused? Do you mean the tube from the flange at the head to the collector or from the collector to the flange on the turbo.

I have seen good success with 1 5/8" from the flange at the head to the collector. Many people are using stock manifolds and I doubt they are bigger than 1 5/8s to the collector. However I have never measured because there are 7 second cars on the stock manifolds.

From the collector to the flange on the turbo you will want 2.5" tubing. The stock manifolds measure right at or just under 2.5" at the collector.

Good luck on the build.
Glenn
W8N2SQZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 01:17 AM   #6
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 634
Default

I personally would go 1 7/8", but that is the maximum your motor can really use at those power levels.

I don't know why there are people comparing stock manifolds to your header. The stock manifold is what you want to replace, so improve upon it. Just because it works doesn't mean it can't be better, making more power at lower boost, and spooling quicker.

I would go 1 7/8" primaries, into dual 2.75" pipes into the two turbochargers. 1 5/8" to dual 2.5s will work great as well, but I think at the specific outputs you'll be nearing you should go at least 1.75".
FieroZ34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 01:44 AM   #7
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
TT LS2 1969 Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Oakland, CA
Posts: 50
Question

Everyone that I deal with says to use 304 stainless steel material to build the exhaust system out of. Any comments or suggestions about mild steel vs. 304 stainless?
TT LS2 1969 Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 01:45 AM   #8
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
TT LS2 1969 Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Oakland, CA
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FieroZ34 View Post
I personally would go 1 7/8", but that is the maximum your motor can really use at those power levels.

I don't know why there are people comparing stock manifolds to your header. The stock manifold is what you want to replace, so improve upon it. Just because it works doesn't mean it can't be better, making more power at lower boost, and spooling quicker.

I would go 1 7/8" primaries, into dual 2.75" pipes into the two turbochargers. 1 5/8" to dual 2.5s will work great as well, but I think at the specific outputs you'll be nearing you should go at least 1.75".
Are you kidding me?!?!?! Stock manifolds, running 7's?!?!?! I need proof and pics! Please.
TT LS2 1969 Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 02:47 AM   #9
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Default

I was referring to 1 5/8 tubes for my Turbo headers. I use 2.5" from the header to the Turbo Flange.
Josh@KY-Turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 03:36 AM   #10
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
DanZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cali/Bay Area
Posts: 3,412
Default

I think 1.75" would work great. Isn't the exhaust port on the head only 1 5/8" and ported ones around 1.75" for most heads?

Dan
DanZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 04:18 AM   #11
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,739
Default

1 5/8" with 2.5" logs on my truck. good for 1050rwhp thru a 4l80e and tcase.

i think the 2.5" logs are a little on the large side. we are steping down to 2.25" logs on our next project and are hoping to see ~1500rwhp eventualy.

here is a pic of a header we made today.

parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 06:24 AM   #12
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
y2khawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Olmsted Falls, OH
Posts: 4,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TT LS2 1969 Camaro View Post
Are you kidding me?!?!?! Stock manifolds, running 7's?!?!?! I need proof and pics! Please.
search for Ohio Boys

Pretty sure both cars are on truck manifolds and in the 7's. But they have got to be getting close to the limit

FWIW, Tom's radial car has been going high 180's on 1 3/4" primary into 2.5" crossovers. Even with the header shrouding the port pretty badly it's still making power
y2khawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 07:09 AM   #13
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
DanZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cali/Bay Area
Posts: 3,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by y2khawk View Post
search for Ohio Boys

Pretty sure both cars are on truck manifolds and in the 7's. But they have got to be getting close to the limit

FWIW, Tom's radial car has been going high 180's on 1 3/4" primary into 2.5" crossovers. Even with the header shrouding the port pretty badly it's still making power
Tom running AllPro heads? Just wondering because of the shrouding as I know they have 1 7/8" ports on their 6 bolt heads.
DanZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 08:48 AM   #14
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
SUPERBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TT LS2 1969 Camaro View Post
Everyone that I deal with says to use 304 stainless steel material to build the exhaust system out of. Any comments or suggestions about mild steel vs. 304 stainless?
Mild steel is cheaper and easier to weld and work with,it works ok too but it will rust and look terrible in no time.Even if you have it coated it will rust from the inside.Best to bite the bullit and use stainless even though it cost more,its harder to work with at least in the average home shop.It will have to be tig welded also.
SUPERBOOST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 09:46 AM   #15
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
y2khawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Olmsted Falls, OH
Posts: 4,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanZ28 View Post
Tom running AllPro heads? Just wondering because of the shrouding as I know they have 1 7/8" ports on their 6 bolt heads.
ET canted valve. They have 2" ports, so we're not exactly ideal. Since the headers were made for a different car, we just dealt with it.
y2khawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 09:59 AM   #16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERBOOST View Post
Mild steel is cheaper and easier to weld and work with,it works ok too but it will rust and look terrible in no time.Even if you have it coated it will rust from the inside.Best to bite the bullit and use stainless even though it cost more,its harder to work with at least in the average home shop.It will have to be tig welded also.
how are they going to rust from the inside if you have them coated.
they will be fine if coated.
some of my junk has been ok, also check out klyes green TA that stenod built looks fine to me.
smokinHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 11:00 AM   #17
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERBOOST View Post
Mild steel is cheaper and easier to weld and work with,it works ok too but it will rust and look terrible in no time.Even if you have it coated it will rust from the inside.Best to bite the bullit and use stainless even though it cost more,its harder to work with at least in the average home shop.It will have to be tig welded also.
that pic of a header i posted up above is 304 stainless scheduel 10. cheap and easy to work with. should be very durable too. you can mig or tig the stainless just like steel.

the little elbows are $7, a 2.25" elbow is $11. that entire header has $132 in parts and we burnt up $22 in holes saws. that includes the t4 flange and header flange all in 304 stainless.
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 03:55 PM   #18
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
W8N2SQZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 668
Default

Hey Parish, did you notice a difference in spool when dropping from 2.5" tube to 2.25" tube?
W8N2SQZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 04:03 PM   #19
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,739
Default

we are just now puting the 2.25" combo together and it will be completely diferent so i wont be able to say even once it is running.
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 04:30 PM   #20
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
SS4Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Bloomfield MI
Posts: 1,010
Default

i used 1 3/4" stainless for my header material, and then a stainless works collector and 2 1/2" stainless for my crossover from the merge to the turbo, and from the turbo all the way to the back of the car is 4" stainless downpipe. and all my cold stuff is in aluminum 3 1/2" and 4"
SS4Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sanderson Headers LS134 Marks62Impala Parts Classifieds 3 01-15-2016 07:45 AM
CAI Length/diameter calculation pharmd Advanced Engineering Tech 20 11-06-2007 01:49 PM
hot side pipe diameter ? quick spool/vs/power lt170chevelle Forced Induction 6 01-29-2007 12:37 AM
Turbo Header Fabrication sparkwirez06 Forced Induction 8 12-30-2005 01:24 AM


Tags
22, bbc, crossover, diameter, exhaust, flanges, header, ls1, ls1tech, make, manifolds, mild, steel, stock, tubing, turbo, twin, type

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.