Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

compression vs boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2008, 08:07 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
BFEGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Temple Terrace/ Thonotosassa
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default compression vs boost

if an sts ls1 car was to change their heads out from the stock heads to 317 truck heads to lower their compression how much more boost could you run? how much more boost would you have to run in order to compensate for the drop in compression? would the end result in horsepower still be about the same before the change in heads and after considering its a stock motor and the limitations of it?


also how does lowering yuor compression affect yoru mpg while driving around not in boost?

thanks in advance.
Old 05-15-2008, 04:06 AM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
TransAmcoupe98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well its kinda hard to say how much boost you can run since turbos flow different amounts of CFM. Since you are an STS guy, I would assume you are starting with either the 60-1 turbo or the upgraded gt67. LS1 heads(10:1 CR) with a gt67 you could saefly do 5psi. 8psi and more will probably require methanol injection if your using pump gas. With a 317 casting head, it would lower compression to around 8:1(someone correct me if I'm wrong). With that being said, using a 317 casting head will lower your lower end power due to the loss of compression but will allow you to run much higher boost, 12-15pds. You would definately see more power gains with running a 317 and more boost. Hope this helps...
Old 05-15-2008, 07:36 AM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
rufretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When I changed from stock heads to 317s it made about the same power N/A, actually a couple more hp but that could be weather, dyno, whatever. Then I straped on a D1 and picked up 260rwhp! It also blew up a few months later lol. So don't think the little drop in compression is fail safe.
Old 05-15-2008, 07:39 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
rufretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TransAmcoupe98
Well its kinda hard to say how much boost you can run since turbos flow different amounts of CFM. Since you are an STS guy, I would assume you are starting with either the 60-1 turbo or the upgraded gt67. LS1 heads(10:1 CR) with a gt67 you could saefly do 5psi. 8psi and more will probably require methanol injection if your using pump gas. With a 317 casting head, it would lower compression to around 8:1(someone correct me if I'm wrong). With that being said, using a 317 casting head will lower your lower end power due to the loss of compression but will allow you to run much higher boost, 12-15pds. You would definately see more power gains with running a 317 and more boost. Hope this helps...
I believe the 317s only drop you a little, so like 10:1 - 9.5:1 or something like that. Definetly NOT 8:1
Old 05-15-2008, 08:00 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (49)
 
trans2000am's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: detroit
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

all in the tune man
Old 05-16-2008, 05:11 PM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My last shop cars 370 was 8.5:1 and made 770rwhp at 15lbs of boost. I am building my new shop cars 370 with 9.5:1 and shooting for similar numbers with less boost. I am running a bigger S480 turbo compared to the last TC76 unit. The extra compression will help with spooling and overall throttle response.

It is all in how you tune the combo.
Old 05-16-2008, 10:24 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Schantin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by rufretic
I believe the 317s only drop you a little, so like 10:1 - 9.5:1 or something like that. Definetly NOT 8:1
Should make it 9:1. I have the Patriot LQ9 heads (same thing as 317's). Still only run 5PSI....cause I'm a puss. Theoretically they'll handle 8-9PSI safely. The tune is the real factor. Fuel is 2nd. Intercooling to lower intake charge is 3rd. The whole point of the lower CR is to delay the onset of detonation so you can be greedier with the boost and get more HP. The downside is that as the boost goes up, so does the heat from compressing the intake charge, so intake charge cooling can still limit you even with lower CR heads. Great tuning + methanol injection can make up for this. But, this creates the next problem.......above the 550-600RWHP zone the stock rod bolts will not like you and will eventually say F'it and quit. This # is easy to exceed on 9PSI
Old 08-07-2009, 08:03 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Johawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I understand is that stock 317s will lower your CR from 10.1:1 to 9.7:1 on a stock LS1. The LQ4 also uses a dished piston to get 9.5:1. Ported 317s probably have unshrouded valves and other chamber work that will lower CR. Some say that 317s flow as well as the LS6 heads but I have never seen this proven (not that I have searched) although they may have similar port volume. Im gonna say that you will lose little to no power switching to as cast 317s but I dont think you are going to gain a big margin for more boost.
Old 08-07-2009, 08:24 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (51)
 
30th t/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 3,095
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

317 wont drop your CR enough to make it worth while with buying the 317s and installing them IMO...Id run the stock heads and Meth.
Old 08-07-2009, 01:13 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
blue00ZZleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

why not run 317's and meth lol...I want to run 12psi with meth on a set of 317's
Old 08-07-2009, 07:34 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
99Z28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I will be running untouched 317's with my speedinc 370 combo and TC78... im shooting for 15psi
Old 08-08-2009, 03:28 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,197
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

guess im lucky still, 317 heads with 16 pounds on super safe tune. no meth, stock bottom end.
Old 08-08-2009, 03:32 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
99Z28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Reject
guess im lucky still, 317 heads with 16 pounds on super safe tune. no meth, stock bottom end.
it must be SUPER safe, I wasn't gonna ever push my stock bottom end that far... I would have been scared at 10psi lol
Old 08-08-2009, 03:57 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,197
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

i got leave so i wasnt caring if it blew.... now i dont know if id do that again... car couldnt even stay planted halfway down the run
Old 08-09-2009, 02:07 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
DREAMZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hate to be the guy to ask the stupid question but here goes.

Is it possible to have an intake manifold with a larger volume?

And if so that would lower the intake charge temps, right?



Quick Reply: compression vs boost



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 PM.