A/F Ratio after 30 SVO's
#1
A/F Ratio after 30 SVO's
If you look at my dyno graph below you will see that I am running lean 14.1 with my 2002 OEM injecters. How much richer will A/F ratio get if I simply swap to 30 SVO injecters and NO tuning?
Is there any other simple way I can richen A/F ratio without tuning.
Blue line : Base run 14.1 ratio (too lean)
Red line: Nitrous run 12.7 (OK)
Is there any other simple way I can richen A/F ratio without tuning.
Blue line : Base run 14.1 ratio (too lean)
Red line: Nitrous run 12.7 (OK)
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mount Dora, Fla
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For starters I would not run for a extended time period without tuning, dangerous. I just put 30# SVO's in my car but can't get a dyno appointment til next week. My buddy put 30# SVO's in his '02 Camaro and was 13/1 before the swap and 11/1 after.
#3
Originally Posted by bigdsz
My buddy put 30# SVO's in his '02 Camaro and was 13/1 before the swap and 11/1 after.
So if the above quote is correct I would need something in between the 30 SVO and the 2002 OEM injector to correct my A/F ratio from 14.1 to 13.1. The SVO's flow rate measures 30lbs-hr at 3bar(43.51) and my OEM 2002 injecters measure 24.7lbs-hr @3bar(43.51). So I would need a flow rate of 27lbs-hr @ 3bar(43.51) or 32lbs-hr @ 4bar(58.02). Is there one that will flow close to these figures
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mount Dora, Fla
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are flat out crazy not to get a tune, also you can't figure off my buddys numbers because he was already tuned for a CC XER 224/228. Plus he went to a CC XER 242/248 .610/.615. I don't want you to nuke your engine and that is a distinct possibility.
#6
Pathological Modifier
iTrader: (11)
I would be very weary of running around with bigger injectors untuned. The car will be extreamly rich pretty much all the time. The computer will pull as much fuel as posible to keep the part throttle AFR up, but even then I suspect that it will be over rich. The problem with running over rich is, washing the the cylenders down with too much fuel can ruin the rings and cause the oil to become contaminated with raw fuel. Both are bad juju.
Ryan K.
Ryan K.
#7
I have been running my car at 14.1 A/F ratio for 2 years now with lots of wide open throttle runs and no sign of KR (on dyno) or audible knocking sounds. What are the long term side effects of running 14.1 lean other than better gas milage. According to a book I read some race engine tuners shoot for low 14 A/F ratios.
I will soon buy HP tuners or EFI live. But for now I will have to pay someone to tune it richer between 13.0-13.7
I will soon buy HP tuners or EFI live. But for now I will have to pay someone to tune it richer between 13.0-13.7
Last edited by gollum; 09-02-2005 at 04:38 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gollum
I have been running my car at 14.1 A/F ratio for 2 years now with lots of wide open throttle runs and no sign of KR (on dyno) or audible knocking sounds. What are the long term side effects of running 14.1 lean other than better gas milage. According to a book I read some race engine tuners shoot for low 14 A/F ratios.
I will soon buy HP tuners or EFI live. But for now I will have to pay someone to tune it richer between 13.0-13.7
I will soon buy HP tuners or EFI live. But for now I will have to pay someone to tune it richer between 13.0-13.7
#9
Originally Posted by txhorns281
I've never seen an instance on our cars where 14.1 did better than 12.5-13.0
AFR 12.......433 rwhp (sae)
AFR 12.6....438 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.1....445 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.8....450 rwhp (sae)
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SideStep
I have over 83 dyno runs (dyno-jet) on my current hardware/mods for testing and tuning. I have ALWAYS gained HP running leaner. Below are some examples from last month. All pulls were at 27.5 degrees advance over 3400rpms. 30 degrees of advance loss me about 7-10 rwhp...
AFR 12.......433 rwhp (sae)
AFR 12.6....438 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.1....445 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.8....450 rwhp (sae)
AFR 12.......433 rwhp (sae)
AFR 12.6....438 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.1....445 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.8....450 rwhp (sae)
#12
Originally Posted by SideStep
I have over 83 dyno runs (dyno-jet) on my current hardware/mods for testing and tuning. I have ALWAYS gained HP running leaner. Below are some examples from last month. All pulls were at 27.5 degrees advance over 3400rpms. 30 degrees of advance loss me about 7-10 rwhp...
AFR 12.......433 rwhp (sae)
AFR 12.6....438 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.1....445 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.8....450 rwhp (sae)
AFR 12.......433 rwhp (sae)
AFR 12.6....438 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.1....445 rwhp (sae)
AFR 13.8....450 rwhp (sae)
Yea my new dyno and tuning guy recommends 13.7 AFR. What is the max timing you would recommend using 100shot wet nitrous. My current timing is:
2000rpm 22.5
3500rpm 24.0
5000rpm 26.5
Last edited by gollum; 09-03-2005 at 05:05 PM.
#13
Originally Posted by gollum
THANKS
Yea my new dyno and tuning guy recommends 13.7 AFR. What is the max timing you would recommend using 100shot wet nitrous. My current timing is:
2000rpm 22.5
3500rpm 24.0
5000rpm 26.5
Yea my new dyno and tuning guy recommends 13.7 AFR. What is the max timing you would recommend using 100shot wet nitrous. My current timing is:
2000rpm 22.5
3500rpm 24.0
5000rpm 26.5