Fueling & Injection Fuel Pumps | Injectors | Rails | Regulators | Tanks

injector size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2006, 06:10 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
caviness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liberty,NC
Posts: 698
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default injector size?

what size injector for 450 to 550 rwhp? will my stock 2000 model injectors be big enough for 400 to 475?
Old 12-17-2006, 08:04 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
caviness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liberty,NC
Posts: 698
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

maybe i posted in the wrong place?
Old 12-17-2006, 08:15 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
98LS1auto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by caviness
what size injector for 450 to 550 rwhp? will my stock 2000 model injectors be big enough for 400 to 475?
From what I've just been told 42's will handle that rwhp just fine and then some. I'm going to get 42's because I'm gonna spray and I'm not going to take any chances when it comes to making sure that my motor has enough fuel. Better safe than sorry. Fuel upgrades are cheaper than a new motor.
Old 12-17-2006, 09:08 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
caviness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liberty,NC
Posts: 698
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

thanks for the info.
Old 12-17-2006, 10:30 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Boodyrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

42s are more than enough, even on juice or FI at those power levels... towards 475 rwhp you'd want to look closely at duty cycle if your getting there FI, but should still be fine.

Stock, despite some folks claims, are really beyond their ability to supply enough fuel SAFELY around 400.

Also... the 2000 injectors flow a bit less than the 98 or 01/02, so you'd be even further beyond the limits.

You could go 36, but the price of 42s is often lower than for 36s. And be aware that the Accel injectors have been known to fall short of advertised flow, sometimes dangerously so. Do a search for 42s you'll find some good deals out there.

Seriously consider pump upgrades as well, the Racetronics kit is well thought of.
Old 12-18-2006, 12:09 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
2 fast 2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boodyrider
42s are more than enough, even on juice or FI at those power levels... towards 475 rwhp you'd want to look closely at duty cycle if your getting there FI, but should still be fine.

Stock, despite some folks claims, are really beyond their ability to supply enough fuel SAFELY around 400.

Also... the 2000 injectors flow a bit less than the 98 or 01/02, so you'd be even further beyond the limits.

You could go 36, but the price of 42s is often lower than for 36s. And be aware that the Accel injectors have been known to fall short of advertised flow, sometimes dangerously so. Do a search for 42s you'll find some good deals out there.

Seriously consider pump upgrades as well, the Racetronics kit is well thought of.
The reason they flow less is because there smaller. 98,01,02's have bigger injectors (28lbs) from the factory. I have a 2000ss h/c, bolt-ons, and a 150 shot. At 560rwhp+ my injectors are fine, and they are factory 26lbs. Ran the car for over 100 passes and never had a problem. However I agree with you on the fuel pump upgrade though!
Old 12-18-2006, 12:25 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
caviness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liberty,NC
Posts: 698
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

looks like 42 to be safe. then i want need to upgrade no time soon.
Old 12-18-2006, 08:03 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2 fast 2000
The reason they flow less is because there smaller. 98,01,02's have bigger injectors (28lbs) from the factory. I have a 2000ss h/c, bolt-ons, and a 150 shot. At 560rwhp+ my injectors are fine, and they are factory 26lbs. Ran the car for over 100 passes and never had a problem. However I agree with you on the fuel pump upgrade though!
Im cammed and heads are going in about a wk and wife just ordered a harris kit and im probly gonna do 100 shot.I was just wondering what rear do you have and are you an A4? dont know what these 10 bolts can hold on an a4
Old 12-18-2006, 10:14 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
caviness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liberty,NC
Posts: 698
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

any more info. i need it.
Old 12-18-2006, 10:38 AM
  #10  
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
 
MeentSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 10,317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Yes, this sorta is the wrong place to post this, as it belongs in the fuel system section, but either way, here are my thoughts:

If you monitor your fuel pressure like I do, you'll quickly see that the stock fuel systems in these cars drop pressure with increased load. This requires the injectors to stay open longer to compensate for the pressure drop to keep the fueling where it needs to be, driving your injector duty cycle up. So really, there are a couple options here:

1. You get larger injectors that can compensate for any fuel pressure deviations without getting over 80% duty cycle
2. You upgrade the fuel pump
3. You find a way to regulate the fuel pressure so that it stays steady at the rails

In reality, it will probably take a combination of all three to get where you need to be with your fuel system. If you want to take the easier/cheaper way out, get some 42 lb/hr injectors and a Racetronix plug and play system. That should get you where you need to be. You wouldn't need as large of an injector if you could keep the rail pressure constant though, and I'm not sure how to fix that...yet.
Old 12-18-2006, 05:01 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
caviness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liberty,NC
Posts: 698
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

thanks for the info guys.
Old 12-18-2006, 06:51 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
caviness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liberty,NC
Posts: 698
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

thanks for moving my thread.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.