Gears & Axles Driveshafts | Rearends | Differentials | Gears | 12 Bolt | 9 Inch | Dana

Any auto guys with 3.42's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2009, 09:44 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Formula_LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 259
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Any auto guys with 3.42's?

I'll be picking up another 10 bolt soon to upgrade from my 2.73's and I'm on the fence between 3.23's and 3.42's. Just wondering how much worse the gas mileage is with the 3.42's in an A4, compared to 2.73's, and if it was a noticeable difference in performance. Thanks for the help.
Old 03-10-2009, 09:50 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (17)
 
underpressureWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i had 3:42's in my ten bolt, it definitly felt better than 3:23's nothing i can notice in gas mileage difference
Old 03-10-2009, 09:54 PM
  #3  
Trunion King
iTrader: (16)
 
bene's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texan in Colorado
Posts: 4,394
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm using that set for about two years now. I was getting 27mpg w/ 273s now 25 mpg w 342s on the highway.
Old 03-10-2009, 09:59 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
rusty2198's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dayton TX AKA hicktown
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what's 2 miles to the gallon when you will be smiling ear to ear. Also if you do alot of in town driving you will actually get better fuel economy with the 3.42's no more engine struggle from red light to red light. Add a stall converter and the smile will get bigger and is a blast to drive but make sure you get a lockup model or your smile will turn upside down on the highway. Dude don't even consider the 3.23's get the 3.42's or better yet get 3.73's
Old 03-10-2009, 11:03 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Strahley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

+1 for 3.73s
Old 03-10-2009, 11:10 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Silver_TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Running 3.42's. But i think i need 3.23s for my turbo setup and 4l80.
Old 03-10-2009, 11:20 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
rusty2198's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dayton TX AKA hicktown
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

go with 3.23's on turbo. my buddies mustang 331 single turbo ran faster et's with 3.20's than when he had 3.73's that was on a c4 trans.
Old 03-10-2009, 11:39 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Silver_TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll change them when my 10bolt dies. Thanks for the advice.
Old 03-11-2009, 12:42 AM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
02 BLK WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glen Carbon, IL
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

3.42's here
Old 03-11-2009, 12:46 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (32)
 
jetlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southaven, MS (near Memphis, TN)
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

3.50s
Old 03-11-2009, 02:44 AM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
koolaid_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I dropped about 2 mpg when I went from a 2.73 to a 3.42. But it made the car a lot more fun to drive, and well worth it IMHO.
And Goodyear likes it too, since I leave a lot more of their product on the roads now.
Old 03-11-2009, 06:53 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Sunset'01Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Tx
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

keep your 2.73s and get a stall. best of both worlds.

if i did it again that's exactly what i would do.
Old 03-12-2009, 02:15 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
KadinZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: lansing, il
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you wont notice the performance difference, and i wouldn't change the rear-end out unless theres something wrong with the one in there. get a converter, it will make a difference you can feel.

edit: yeah, i had 2.73's and broke my rear-end so i bought a used one from a manual that has 3.42's, the gas mileage has changed slightly like 1mpg or so but isnt that bad.. the big annoyance is on long trips my odometer lies to me!!!!!
Old 03-12-2009, 02:17 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
shtnfrds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

if your buying new gears, just do 3.73's. if you got a great deal on used 3.42's, go that route. but id definatly vote 3.73
Old 03-12-2009, 08:11 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (43)
 
rel3rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD.
Posts: 2,836
Received 284 Likes on 187 Posts

Default

Can't help you out on any mileage comparisons since mine had 323's stock, but I love my 342's. I actually tried 410's and my small cammed, 3600 stalled, 3755# car ran almost EXACTLY the same 60 foots, exact same ETs, and exact same MPHs as it did with (and actually an ever so slight edge to) the 342's, so back in they went.

BTW, only reason I went from 323's to 342's a nearly two years ago was because stock 323 rear was noisy when I bought the car and it was more cost effective to find another complete rear and swap it in.

On a side note, a buddy with a very similar setup as mine, but with 273's, just went 11.80's at 116, while mine has only been a best of 11.61 @ 116...so, 273's and a good converter really aren't all that hateful IMHO....
Old 03-12-2009, 08:43 PM
  #16  
Teching In
iTrader: (6)
 
Vogos97c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I had the 2.73's in my 98 Z28, and then did a full rearend swap to the 3.42's. Honestly I liked the feel of the 2.73's better. I could tell a difference between the two performance wise. I had to feather the throttle a lot more on the street with the 3.42's, hooking was definitely a problem. My gas mileage dropped about 2mpg, I was still getting high 20's. I just liked the sweet spots and the cruising rpm's better with the 2.73's. Now I have the 3.23's in my 99Z, and I think it is a nice mix of the two. I don't have a stall yet but I'm sure the car will be pretty sick with a 3800rpm stall in it. I have a 3.42 rearend ready for a swap, but I'm gonna take it to the track with the 3.23's first and see how I like it. If anything I might just say screw it and throw 3.73's in the other rearend and have a tire melting machine...
Old 03-12-2009, 08:55 PM
  #17  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
99_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Went to 3.42 from 3.23 didnt notice much of a difference....but from 2.73 I sure you will.
Old 03-13-2009, 07:09 AM
  #18  
Internet Mechanic
iTrader: (17)
 
BlackScreaminMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wallingford CT
Posts: 9,831
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I didnt mind the 3.42's when I had my 12 bolt in there. The 383 LT1, really needed a 3.73 though.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.