3.23s 60 MPH, 2000 RPMs
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3.23s 60 MPH, 2000 RPMs
I recently purchased my first Fbody. I picked up a 1998 Trans Am with just over 100k miles on it. After checking the door code to see that I had 323s, I realized something wasn't quite right. While at 2000 RPMs, I noticed my car is only at 60 MPH. According to the sticky, I should be around 67 MPH.
The rear tires are 245/50/16 in case the size of tire could be throwing my speedo off.
Is it possible that an owner before me replaced the stock gears with something bigger than a 3.23?
I should also mention that my car feels pretty weak in comparison to my buddy's 2000 z28 A4 with 3.23s. I can't even break the tires loose WOT from a dig. And that's saying something considering the tires I have are at 5% tread life.
The rear tires are 245/50/16 in case the size of tire could be throwing my speedo off.
Is it possible that an owner before me replaced the stock gears with something bigger than a 3.23?
I should also mention that my car feels pretty weak in comparison to my buddy's 2000 z28 A4 with 3.23s. I can't even break the tires loose WOT from a dig. And that's saying something considering the tires I have are at 5% tread life.
#2
Staging Lane
iTrader: (10)
My A4 & 3.73s do about 2K at 60. It is possible they have been changed.
245/50R16 Is the correct size tire for a a trans am in 1998.
The 1998s had some different engine setups compared to the 99 and later models. I think at least the heads,cam and fuel system are different. I also know that tuners say that the computer is harder to program(tune).
Maybe somebody more knowledgeable can shed some light what the exact differences are.
245/50R16 Is the correct size tire for a a trans am in 1998.
The 1998s had some different engine setups compared to the 99 and later models. I think at least the heads,cam and fuel system are different. I also know that tuners say that the computer is harder to program(tune).
Maybe somebody more knowledgeable can shed some light what the exact differences are.
Last edited by mikey1107; 08-09-2010 at 12:06 PM.
#3
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's exactly what the calculator I was using said. If I really have 3.73s, there is something holding my car back drastically.
Is it possible that the owner before me swapped gears without tuning the PCM accordingly?
I also guess I could have clogged cats, but my ses light isn't recognizing it if that is, in fact, the problem.
And I just spoke with a shop owner who believes I could have a problem with the converter.
Is it possible that the owner before me swapped gears without tuning the PCM accordingly?
I also guess I could have clogged cats, but my ses light isn't recognizing it if that is, in fact, the problem.
And I just spoke with a shop owner who believes I could have a problem with the converter.
Last edited by matt.martin87; 08-09-2010 at 12:31 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Converter not locking up sounds legit. Could always pull the cover and count the teeth just to make sure, it could probably use a fluid change anyways. And make sure your SES light comes on when you first turn the key on, cause i had a 98 chevy that i thought was good, turns out the SES light was burnt out.
-Will
-Will
#11
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts