Gears & Axles Driveshafts | Rearends | Differentials | Gears | 12 Bolt | 9 Inch | Dana

opinions on rear-gear ratio for LS swapped 72' Cutlass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2015, 03:29 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Bansheeman6100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default opinions on rear-gear ratio for LS swapped 72' Cutlass

ok guys, working on the motor and about to tear into the 4l60e for my 1972 Cutlass, and am currently deciding on rear gear ratio, so i can tell my guy that is making my harness and flashing my ECU. the car currently has a 10 bolt with 2.73's. the car will end up with 275/60R15's on the rear, a 28" tire. the car will be a daily-driver, and i would like to keep the highway RPM's decently low, while not being a slug around town. im considering 3.08's, 3.23's or 3.42's

what do yall think?
Old 03-03-2015, 04:42 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Euclid,Ohio
Posts: 4,155
Received 129 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

what would you consider highway rpm decently low ?
Old 03-03-2015, 04:54 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Bansheeman6100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FirstYrLS1Z
what would you consider highway rpm decently low ?
Well, that's a good question. Low enough to maintain Decent mileage. This will be my first gas vehicle in a good amount of years, and first LS motor. I usually build cummins'
Old 03-03-2015, 05:30 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Euclid,Ohio
Posts: 4,155
Received 129 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

what's the weight of a 72 cutlass ? I'm guessing it would be less than a 4th gen F-bod.
4L60E has a .7 overdrive 4th gear and you haven't mentioned anything about the torque convertor. I assume it'll be an aftermarket with 'lock-up'.
sounds like you gonna be a computer controlled LS motor. 28" tire has a larger rolling diameter than the typical F-bod tire(26"). I think it'll surprise you how good your mpg is gonna be.
Some typical mpgs' with A4 I've gathered from posts.
2.73-26.9
3.08-24.7
3.23-24.5 1800rpm @ 60mph 2200rpm @ 72mph
3.42-24.0
3.73-23.0
4.10-22.2
4.56-21.5 2500rpm @ 60mph 3000rpm @ 72mph
Old 03-03-2015, 08:17 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Bansheeman6100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, computer controlled, I'm having my ecu flashed and having a custom harness made now. I'm planning on using the stock converter from my 2002 Tahoe donor vehicle, along with the shaved truck intake and throttle body. I'm refreshing the motor, but not doing anything crazy for now. Hoping to find a deal on a LS6 cam, or another decent budget cam. Also refreshing the trans and installing the HD2 shift kit
Old 03-04-2015, 10:28 AM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Bansheeman6100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well, ended up ordering a set of 225/70R14 Cobra's and am going to use my original SSII wheels for now, so that is a 26.8" tire. using this calculator, i think i am going to go with a 3.42

http://www.coastdriveline.com/htmlfo...lculator2.html
Old 03-04-2015, 11:10 AM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Euclid,Ohio
Posts: 4,155
Received 129 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

well at least you eliminated the 3.08 and 3.23.
whether or not it's a 'slug' will depend on the convertor.
you might want to look up/converse with 'speedtigger' here on the ls1tech florida forum,his is a 65 skylark conversion.
Old 03-04-2015, 11:54 AM
  #8  
ss1
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (32)
 
ss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scarborough, Maine
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

With tall rear tires and a .7:1 overdrive I'd consider 3.73's if not 4.10/4.11's. Just an opinion though.
Old 03-05-2015, 07:59 AM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Euclid,Ohio
Posts: 4,155
Received 129 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

^^^ 3.73s' would be ideal.
IF I were building that car,
-since it's a framed vehicle and not a unibody type,the basic platform will be adequately rigid.
-the 8.5" GM 10 bolt should be able to handle anything you throw at it. I'd do 4.10s' to make it a 'shocker' on the street.
-a torque convertor of Yank SS3600(or CircleD equivalent) to give 'lock-up' for the freeway to get decent mpg and spin around 2250rpm at 60mph. LS engines like rpm. I ran 4.56s' with A4 for 4 years. That put me at 3000rpm @ 72mph. Even took 4 trips to Florida from Ohio with 4.56s'.
-I think the 72 cutlass had upper and lower control arms for the rearend,change the factory OEM rubber bushings for the new stuff and a set of adjustable rear shocks to be able to change the ride characteristics from comfortable to 'fun' for traction.
Old 03-05-2015, 07:15 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
murphinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by FirstYrLS1Z
-the 8.5" GM 10 bolt should be able to handle anything you throw at it. I'd do 4.10s' to make it a 'shocker' on the street.
.
73 was the first year for the 8.5" corporate including in the a bodies , 72's had either the 8.2 10 bolt or a 12 bolt , the 8.2's were kinda weak...

as for gears the 4l60 has a very low 1st gear like the 700r4 did so you have a wide range of gears that can work - a highway gear will still pull well in 1st and as mentioned if you go with a more aggressive gear the od will keep the rpm's in check at highway speeds.
Old 03-05-2015, 07:20 PM
  #11  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,826
Received 50 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by murphinator
73 was the first year for the 8.5" corporate including in the a bodies , 72's had either the 8.2 10 bolt or a 12 bolt , the 8.2's were kinda weak
71 was the first year for the corporate 8.5 in A Bodies. The Buick versions had bolt in axles eliminating the need for c-clip eliminators.
Old 03-06-2015, 08:38 AM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Euclid,Ohio
Posts: 4,155
Received 129 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

the 8.2 was used up to and including 1971,the 8.5 started in 1971.1971 was a 'crossover' year so 71's could have had either a 8.2 or 8.5,after 71 8.5s'.
Old 03-06-2015, 06:42 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
murphinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you guys are right I just did a search , it went back further than I recalled in some models ... I had a bunch of chevelles back in the day including a couple small block 72's that had factory 12 bolts and a 73 big block that had the 8.5



Quick Reply: opinions on rear-gear ratio for LS swapped 72' Cutlass



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.