Installing 3.42s in a 2.73 carrier--need new???
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Installing 3.42s in a 2.73 carrier--need new???
I called a local performace place and they said that I need a new carrier if I want to install 3.42s in my 2000 WS6, it has 2.73s now and its an A4. These 3.42s are from a camero and I thought they would fit?? They also mentioned an ABS key?? I think I need to call another shop... they didn't see the parts nor the car I just called to get an estimate.
Question can these gears be installed in my stock 10 bolt??
Thanks.
Question can these gears be installed in my stock 10 bolt??
Thanks.
#2
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hutchinson,KS
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you had 2.73's you have a 2-series carrier. almost anything else would need a 3-series carrier unless the gears were made for a 2-series but it sounds like you already have the gears so the choice is yours...new carrier or gears. if the rear is a 3channel abs then there is a reluctor wheel on the carrier idk if they differ between carriers but they can be removed and reinstalled
#3
Tech Resident
If they think you need a new carrier to do a gear swap, call another shop. Save yourself the headache because they don't know what they're talking about. All you need is a "thick gear" - a 2 series gear. Both Richmond and Strange makes 2 series 3.42's for GM 10-bolt's.
For Richmond 3.42's:
http://www.ls1speed.com/cont.cfm?cid=C0000213
You need the following:
Part # RMG4900051
Richmond 3.42 Gear Set -for 2 series carrier $219.99
For Strange 3.42's:
http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...&vid=3&pcid=67
You need the following:
Part # 23-875342-X
Strange Pro-Street Gears, 3.42 Gear Ratio, 2 series carrier, GM 7.5" 10 bolt rear end $225.00
For Richmond 3.42's:
http://www.ls1speed.com/cont.cfm?cid=C0000213
You need the following:
Part # RMG4900051
Richmond 3.42 Gear Set -for 2 series carrier $219.99
For Strange 3.42's:
http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...&vid=3&pcid=67
You need the following:
Part # 23-875342-X
Strange Pro-Street Gears, 3.42 Gear Ratio, 2 series carrier, GM 7.5" 10 bolt rear end $225.00
#4
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks
Thanks guys so I guess a used set of stock 3.42 gears from a Camero is not going to work in my rear-not sure why type of carrier they have? I didn't get the gears yet, good thing.
#7
Tech Resident
If you've ever seen a set of 3-series gears next to a set of 2-series gears, you'll be so happy you have a 2-series carrier. 2-series gears are a lot stronger - they're almost twice as thick!
Trending Topics
#8
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No spacers! The stock 10 bolt really doesent need another weak link. get the 2 series gears. Since they are aftermarket they may be a little more forgiving. If you have the cash, throw in a bearing support cover too. Just my $.02
#9
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Schiller Park (NW burb of Chicago)
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not to highjack, but is there a reason you guys are going 3.42 over a 3.73...I have .73s as well and I am looking to get gears soon, but not sure if i should go 3.73 or 3.42
#10
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
I went 3.42 since it spools the turbo quicker than 3.73, because there is more load on the engine. Plus I wanted to retain reasonable gas mileage since it's mostly street driven. The gears have hurt my mileage more than any other mod I've done. I know, I'm sounding like someone driving
#11
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks
Thanks guys!! I was hoping to do this all cheap but since I need to buy new gears for $220 instead of the used 3.42s for $65 and then get someone to install them $200-300 then its going to have to wait for a while. Unless someone is near NJ that can help me and I'll pay.
I was going to go with 3.42s because this is my DD and I didn't want to hurt my gas mileage alot. I read a bunch of posts and alot love the 3.42s and alot love the 3.73s so its personal preference. Anything is better than 2.73s, but not to bother with 3.23s. The 3.42s fit me the best. DD and once in a while going to the track.
I was going to go with 3.42s because this is my DD and I didn't want to hurt my gas mileage alot. I read a bunch of posts and alot love the 3.42s and alot love the 3.73s so its personal preference. Anything is better than 2.73s, but not to bother with 3.23s. The 3.42s fit me the best. DD and once in a while going to the track.
#13
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
I was going to go with 3.42s because this is my DD and I didn't want to hurt my gas mileage alot. I read a bunch of posts and alot love the 3.42s and alot love the 3.73s so its personal preference. Anything is better than 2.73s, but not to bother with 3.23s. The 3.42s fit me the best. DD and once in a while going to the track.
Why would it be pointless for a 3.23 rear to go to 3.42 yet at the same time a 2.73 rear is a good idea to 3.42? Its the same car other than the rear. Just go right to 3.73.
<--- @ 3.42/3.73 battle
#14
Tech Resident
I went 3.42 since it spools the turbo quicker than 3.73, because there is more load on the engine. Plus I wanted to retain reasonable gas mileage since it's mostly street driven. The gears have hurt my mileage more than any other mod I've done. I know, I'm sounding like someone driving
Yes, going 3.23 to 3.42 is pretty much pointless, but honestly, if I had 3.23's stock, I wouldn't bother doing a gear swap. 3.23's are a decent gear for the f-body. IMO, it's not worth risking getting a noisy gear set and paying $600 for a gear swap if you have 3.23's. It's only worth it IMO if you have 2.73's since they're just ridiculous. But that's my opinion.
#15
Pontiacerator
iTrader: (12)
The reason I vote 3.73's is because how everyone says that the jump from 3.23 to 3.42 is pointless. Yea understand that its a bigger increment to go from the 2.73 to 3.42 but the money and time does not justify me to jump to someting that half the stock A4's consider "pointless." Why would it be pointless for a 3.23 rear to go to 3.42 yet at the same time a 2.73 rear is a good idea to 3.42? Its the same car other than the rear. Just go right to 3.73.
It's not a matter of 3.73's somehow being the "right" gear. It's a matter of the percentage difference between one gearset and another.
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
Yes, going 3.23 to 3.42 is pretty much pointless, but honestly, if I had 3.23's stock, I wouldn't bother doing a gear swap. 3.23's are a decent gear for the f-body. IMO, it's not worth risking getting a noisy gear set and paying $600 for a gear swap if you have 3.23's. It's only worth it IMO if you have 2.73's since they're just ridiculous.
#16
Just change the rear in my son's car to 3.42's from 2.73. Made a big difference and still cruises nice on the highway. Now he has traction problems - from a standing start the car just incinerates the tires. Either way you go (3.42 or 3.73), your next step will be looking for traction.
#19
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surferd15, I would check your RPO code on the door first, (as mentioned in the last sticky in the forum and if u want to be sure pull the cover and count the teeth. Hell mine said 41:15 (2.73's) right on the ring gear! 98 camaro with 2.73's series 2 gears.